Search Results for keywords:"unfunded mandates reform act"

Search Results: keywords:"unfunded mandates reform act"

H. R. 10300 — To provide for congressional review of rules with respect to which the agency explicitly relied on Chevron deference in the notice of proposed rulemaking or a Federal court upheld the rule based on Chevron deference.
December 05, 2024
Status:Introduced in House
Congress:118
Words:2,187
H.R. 10300, known as the “Congressional Re-Review Act” or the “Chevron Re-Review Act,” proposes a system for Congress to review rules that relied on Chevron deference, a legal doctrine previously used to uphold agency rules. The bill responds to a Supreme Court decision that overturned...
Simple Explanation
Imagine there was a rule that said, "If someone is doing something, we listen to them because they know best." H.R. 10300 is like saying, "We want to look over those rules again to make sure they're still good," because a big group said we don't have to just trust them anymore.
H. R. 7867 — To amend the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 to require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to establish a limit for the total amount of additional unfunded regulatory costs that may be imposed in a fiscal year, and for other purposes.
April 05, 2024
Status:Introduced in House
Congress:118
Words:2,608
H.R. 7867, titled the "Renewing Efficiency in Government by Budgeting Act" or "REG Budgeting Act," proposes changes to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It aims to require the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to set limits on the extra unfunded regulatory costs...
Simple Explanation
The REG Budgeting Act wants to make rules that tell the government how much it can spend on things they haven't paid for each year, so they don't spend too much without asking Congress first. It also asks for clear reports on these costs to make sure everyone knows what’s happening.
H. R. 7867 — To amend the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 to require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to establish a limit for the total amount of additional unfunded regulatory costs that may be imposed in a fiscal year, and for other purposes.
December 18, 2024
Status:Reported in House
Congress:118
Words:2,837
The bill proposes changes to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 by requiring the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to set limits on the amount of new unfunded regulatory costs that agencies can impose each fiscal year. This means that government agencies would need to get...
Simple Explanation
The bill wants to make sure that before the government makes new rules that cost money, they have to set a limit on those costs each year, and explain why if they want to go over that limit. This is to keep everything fair and clear, like setting a budget so they don’t spend too much without asking permission.
H. R. 3230 — To amend the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 to provide for regulatory impact analyses for certain rules, and for other purposes.
💰
December 18, 2024
Status:Reported in House
Congress:118
Words:3,578
H.R. 3230 aims to update the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 to ensure certain federal rules have detailed regulatory impact analyses. This includes assessing the economic effects and other implications of rules costing $100 million or more. The bill also enhances consultation with...
Simple Explanation
H.R. 3230 is a plan to make sure big new rules from the government, costing $100 million or more, get checked for how they affect money and people. It wants different groups like states, tribes, and businesses to be part of the conversation when making these rules.

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results