The joint resolution H. J. RES. 142 is a legislative measure intended to express Congress's disapproval of a specific rule from the Department of Labor. This rule, known as the "Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary," was published on April...
Congress made a plan called H. J. RES. 142 to say they don't like a new rule about who gets to give advice on retirement savings. If they agree on this plan, the rule won't count anymore.
S. J. RES. 87 is a joint resolution aimed at rejecting a specific rule put forth by the Department of the Treasury. This rule deals with "Clean Vehicle Credits" as outlined under Sections 25E and 30D, covering aspects such as the transfer of credits, critical minerals and...
In this bill, Congress is saying "no" to a new rule about car credits because they don't agree with it. This rule involves special money rules for clean cars, the stuff that makes their batteries, and certain countries they are worried about.
S. J. RES. 57 is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate that seeks to block a rule issued by the Department of the Treasury concerning the "Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds." The resolution is part of a congressional process to disapprove and nullify...
This bill is like a big STOP sign from Congress telling the Treasury they don't agree with a new money rule about helping states and towns recover from COVID-19, and they don't want that rule to happen. But they don't explain why or what happens next, so it's like a mystery for everyone trying to use those funds.
H. J. RES. 188 is a resolution in the 118th Congress that seeks to stop a specific rule from the Department of the Interior related to "Conservation and Landscape Health." The resolution, introduced by Representative Curtis and others, aims to disapprove this rule under a...
This bill is like a decision by grown-ups to say no to a new rule that the Department of the Interior wanted to use to take care of nature. They want to make sure the rule doesn’t happen, but they haven't explained why.
S. J. RES. 58 is a resolution by the United States Congress that seeks to overturn a rule set by the Department of Energy. This rule is related to the "Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Furnaces", which was recorded in the Federal Register on December 18, 2023. If...
Congress made a decision to stop a new rule about furnace energy-saving standards from the Department of Energy, so those rules won't be used anymore.
H. J. RES. 144 is a joint resolution that allows Congress to reject a specific rule proposed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives within the Department of Justice. This rule concerns the definition of what it means to be "engaged in the business" as a firearms dealer....
Congress wants to stop a new rule from being used that changes who is considered a person selling guns as a business. They're using a special power to say, "No, we don't want this rule."
H. J. RES. 180 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives that seeks to disapprove a rule set by the Department of Energy. This rule concerns "Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings," as published in the Federal Register on May 1,...
H. J. RES. 180 is like saying "no" to a new rule that wanted to make sure new government buildings use clean energy like solar or wind. Some people didn't explain clearly why they don't like this rule or what they want to do instead.
The joint resolution, S. J. RES. 96, seeks to disapprove a rule from the Department of Education. This rule relates to nondiscrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. Introduced by multiple senators, the resolution...
The bill is about some senators wanting to stop a new rule that tells schools not to treat boys and girls differently if they get money from the government. They say, if they pass this, that rule shouldn't be used or listened to anymore.
H. J. RES. 184 is a proposal for Congress to reject a rule introduced by the Department of Energy. This rule involves the "Energy Conservation Program," specifically setting energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters, as published in the Federal Register on May 6, 2024. If...
H. J. RES. 184 is a proposal for Congress to say "no" to a new rule about saving energy with water heaters in people's homes. If Congress agrees, the new energy-saving rules won't be used, even though the Department of Energy wanted them to be.
S. J. RES. 90 is a joint resolution that seeks to reverse a specific rule created by the Department of Health and Human Services. This rule, documented in the Federal Register on May 6, 2024, under the title "Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities," is being...
S. J. RES. 90 is a plan from the Senate to stop a new rule that tells healthcare programs they can't treat people unfairly. If the plan wins, the rule won't count anymore and can't be used.
H. J. RES. 15 is a joint resolution that seeks to overturn a specific rule issued by the Department of Energy. This rule is about energy conservation standards for commercial water heating equipment. The resolution expresses congressional disapproval of the rule, rendering it ineffective if...
H. J. RES. 15 is like saying "no thank you" to a new rule about saving energy for big water heaters. It asks the people in charge to ignore the rule that was made because they don't agree with it.
S. J. RES. 101 is a joint resolution disapproving a rule from the Department of Health and Human Services. This rule relates to the "Designated Placement Requirements for LGBTQI plus Children" and was published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2024. If passed, the resolution would nullify...
In simple terms, this is about a plan to stop a new rule from the Department of Health that was supposed to help make sure LGBTQI plus kids are placed in safe and respectful homes. Some people in the Senate don't agree with this rule, so they want to cancel it and not replace it with anything else.
H. J. RES. 154 is a joint resolution that seeks congressional disapproval of a specific rule from the Bureau of Land Management. This rule pertains to the procedures for acquiring and managing fluid mineral leases in the United States. The resolution declares that the rule, which was...
H. J. RES. 154 is a suggestion from Congress to undo a new rule about how they manage and get oil and gas leases on public land. They think the rule should be canceled and not be followed anymore.
H. J. RES. 111 is a resolution in the 118th Congress that seeks to disapprove a rule submitted by the Department of Energy. This rule relates to the Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Furnaces. The resolution, if passed, would prevent the rule from taking effect,...
H. J. RES. 111 is a plan from Congress to say "no" to a certain rule about using less energy in home furnaces. If they decide against it, the rule will not happen, and things will stay the way they are now.
H. J. RES. 182 is a resolution proposed in the House of Representatives that seeks to nullify a rule from the Department of Health and Human Services. This rule pertains to the "Designated Placement Requirements for LGBTQI plus Children," which was published in the Federal...
H. J. RES. 182 is a decision made by some people in the government to stop a rule that was supposed to help decide where LGBTQI plus children should live. They didn't say why they want to stop it, but if they do, the rule won't count anymore.
H. J. RES. 109 is a joint resolution by the United States Congress expressing disapproval of a rule by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." The resolution declares that this rule should have no legal power or effect. The opinion that...
The big group of people in charge of making rules (Congress) said they don't like a new rule made by the people who check money stuff (the SEC) because they think it shouldn't be a rule at all. So now, they're telling everyone that this new money rule shouldn't count anymore.
H. J. RES. 130 is a joint resolution in the 118th Congress that addresses a rule made by the Federal Railroad Administration concerning train crew size safety requirements. The resolution suggests that Congress disapproves of this rule, which was published in the Federal...
Congress is thinking about stopping a new rule that says how many people should be working on a train to keep it safe. They want to make sure trains stay safe, but they haven't decided what will happen instead if they stop this rule.
Showing 1 to 17 of 17 results