Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"executive actions"

  • H.R. 937 aims to restrict the Secretary of Education from introducing or enacting any regulations or actions if they are deemed economically significant and lead to an increase in subsidy costs. The bill requires the Secretary to evaluate whether any draft regulations will...

    Simple Explanation

    H.R. 937 is a rule that says the person in charge of education rules can't make new rules if they cost a lot of money, like over $100 million a year, unless they check if it's really necessary. This is to make sure that making new rules doesn’t always mean spending more money.

  • H.R. 9751, also known as the "Executive Action Cost Transparency Act," aims to improve how the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) calculates the budget baseline by including the financial impact of certain executive and judicial actions. The bill proposes amendments to the...

    Simple Explanation

    H.R. 9751, or the "Executive Action Cost Transparency Act," is a rule that wants to be sure the government counts the money impact of big decisions by the President and judges when making budget plans, especially if these decisions cost a lot, like $50 billion over ten years. This helps everyone see how these big choices can change how much the country spends and saves.