Search Results for keywords:"digital consumer payment applications"

Search Results: keywords:"digital consumer payment applications"

S. J. RES. 28 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications.
March 05, 2025
Status:Engrossed in Senate
Congress:119
Words:177
S. J. RES. 28 is a resolution by Congress expressing disapproval of a specific rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This rule was about defining the larger players in the market for digital payment applications used by consumers. By passing this...
Simple Explanation
Congress decided that a rule, which tells us who the big players are in the market for apps that help people pay for things digitally, should not be used anymore. This means that the rule won't count or be followed.
S. J. RES. 28 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications.
February 27, 2025
Status:Introduced in Senate
Congress:119
Words:203
S. J. RES. 28 is a joint resolution aiming to overturn a specific rule created by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This rule defines what constitutes "larger participants" in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. The resolution,...
Simple Explanation
S. J. RES. 28 is about stopping a rule that sets the rules for who is a big player in making apps for paying with phones. Two people in the Senate want this rule to not work anymore, but the reasons for doing this aren't very clear.
H. J. RES. 64 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications.
February 27, 2025
Status:Introduced in House
Congress:119
Words:206
H.J. Res. 64 is a joint resolution disapproving a specific rule made by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This rule defined what constitutes "larger participants" in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. By passing this resolution,...
Simple Explanation
H.J. Res. 64 is about Congress stopping a rule from a government group that decides who the big players are in the market for apps that people use to pay for stuff. By stopping this rule, they are saying it shouldn't count anymore.
S. J. RES. 28 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications.
March 04, 2025
Status:Placed on Calendar Senate
Congress:119
Words:220
S. J. RES. 28 is a joint resolution disapproving a new rule established by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This rule aimed to define larger participants in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. The resolution declares that the rule...
Simple Explanation
S. J. RES. 28 is like Congress saying "no" to a new rule about who is a big player in the world of apps we use to pay for things on our phones. They decided this rule shouldn't count or be used anymore.

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results