Overview
Title
To correct the engrossment of the amendment of the Senate to S. 2073.
ELI5 AI
S. RES. 783 is a plan to change the name of a different bill to show it's all about keeping kids safe on the internet, instead of just about how the government reports things.
Summary AI
S. RES. 783 is a resolution in the U.S. Senate that aims to make a correction to the wording of an amendment attached to another bill, S. 2073. Originally, S. 2073 was intended to update reporting requirements for federal agencies. However, this resolution directs the Senate Secretary to change the title of S. 2073 to highlight its purpose as protecting the safety and privacy of children on the internet.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The resolution, titled "S. RES. 783," involves correcting the title of a prior amendment to Senate Bill S. 2073. Originally, S. 2073 aimed to require federal agencies to include lists of outdated or duplicate reporting requirements in their annual budget justifications. However, the proposed amendment changes the bill's title to "An Act to protect the safety and privacy of children on the internet." This change signifies a pivot from government-focused reforms to a broader public interest issue, specifically children's online safety.
Summary of Significant Issues
One primary issue with this legislative action is the significant shift in the bill's focus, as inferred from the new title. Originally concentrated on internal governmental reforms, the bill now suggests a broader scope aimed at children's online safety and privacy. This shift could indicate changes in legislative priorities that may lead to confusion regarding the bill's actual purpose and content. Additionally, the procedural language used in the bill may not be easily understood by those unfamiliar with legislative processes, potentially creating misunderstandings about its goals and implications.
Furthermore, the lack of details about the substantive changes accompanying this title modification limits the ability of stakeholders to understand the full scope and impact of the legislation. This lack of transparency can hinder effective preparation and response to potential changes brought about by this legislation.
Broad Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill could have significant implications, particularly for parents and guardians concerned about the online safety and privacy of children. The change in focus to internet safety aligns with rising public concern over children's exposure to various risks online. However, without clear details on how the bill intends to address these concerns, it is difficult to ascertain the specific protections or regulations that might be implemented. This ambiguity could lead to uncertainty regarding the benefits the bill might provide.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For government agencies, the removal of the requirement to report on outdated or duplicative processes might reduce administrative burdens, allowing them to redirect resources to more pressing issues. However, the shift to focus on children's online safety suggests these agencies might instead be required to develop or implement new regulatory frameworks, potentially requiring different resources and expertise.
Tech companies and internet service providers could face new regulations or compliance requirements aimed at protecting children online. These potential obligations could increase operational costs or necessitate changes in business practices. However, by enhancing children's safety and privacy, these changes might also lead to greater public trust in digital platforms, potentially offering long-term benefits despite the initial challenges.
In summary, S. RES. 783 reflects a notable shift in legislative focus that could have broad implications for various stakeholders. While the intended outcome of addressing children's online safety is a crucial public concern, the absence of precise details on the bill's operative changes presents challenges in gauging its full impact.
Issues
The change in the bill's title from an internal government-focused reform to an act aimed at protecting children's safety and privacy on the internet implies a substantial shift in legislative focus. This could signal a change in priorities that may have broad political and social implications and cause confusion about the bill's intent and scope. (Section: Issues)
The procedural and legislative language used in the bill may not be easily understood by the general public, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the bill's objectives and the process it entails. This disconnect can impact public perception and engagement with the legislative process. (Section: Issues)
The lack of detail on the substantive changes accompanying the title alteration makes it difficult to assess the full impact and legal implications of the bill, leaving stakeholders with limited information to prepare for possible changes in legislation or regulatory environment. (Section: Issues)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Senate has changed the title of the bill S. 2073, which originally aimed to require agencies to list outdated or duplicate reporting requirements in their budget justifications, to now focus on protecting children's safety and privacy on the internet.