Overview

Title

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States, States, cities, Tribal nations, businesses, institutions of higher education, and other institutions in the United States should work toward achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement.

ELI5 AI

The Senate wants everyone in the United States, like towns, cities, and companies, to work together to help stop the earth from getting too warm, like saying, "Let's all do our best to take care of the planet!"

Summary AI

The resolution, S. RES. 36, expresses the opinion of the Senate that the United States and its entities, such as states, cities, and businesses, should strive to meet the goals established by the Paris Agreement on climate change. It highlights the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the impact that these actions can have on limiting the global temperature rise. The resolution also emphasizes support for subnational efforts, like those by local governments and companies, in mitigating climate change impacts and pursuing clean energy initiatives. The aim is to encourage a collaborative approach across different levels of government and society to combat climate change effectively.

Published

2025-01-24
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-01-24
Package ID: BILLS-119sres36is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
320
Pages:
7
Sentences:
5

Language

Nouns: 118
Verbs: 17
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 6
Entities: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.89
Average Sentence Length:
64.00
Token Entropy:
4.13
Readability (ARI):
31.97

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The resolution, S. RES. 36, introduced in the Senate during the 119th Congress, underscores a commitment from the United States to uphold and meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement. The resolution emphasizes collaboration across various levels of government, businesses, educational institutions, and communities. It calls for comprehensive efforts toward reducing global warming pollution and supporting climate change initiatives nationwide. Key sponsors of the resolution include influential Senators such as Mr. Markey, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Sanders, among others, showcasing a significant political backing.

Significant Issues

One notable issue with the resolution is the lack of specificity regarding the actions and measures necessary to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. Without clear directives or plans, there may be ambiguity in how entities are supposed to align their policies and initiatives with these broad objectives. Additionally, the financial implications of staying committed to the Paris Agreement remain undefined, which could lead to unforeseen economic burdens on the government and participating entities.

Another concern is the vagueness in the resolution's support for businesses, investors, and society. There are no explicit guidelines on how this support should be structured or implemented, potentially causing confusion about responsibilities and expectations. The absence of detail on which particular federal, state, or local policies are endorsed further complicates the matter, leaving room for varied interpretations and potentially inconsistent policy enforcement.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the resolution underscores a continued commitment to combating climate change, which could bring about numerous environmental and health benefits. Efforts to reduce pollution and promote clean energy may result in cleaner air, fewer health issues related to pollution, and a more sustainable environment for future generations.

On the economic side, the resolution aligns with ongoing trends in renewable energy and clean technology sectors, which are experiencing growth and job creation. This could translate to more employment opportunities in fields such as renewable energy production, electric vehicles, and energy efficiency solutions. However, these positive outcomes hinge on effective implementation and clear communication of strategies.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For businesses, particularly those in renewable energy and clean technology sectors, the resolution supports further growth and investment opportunities. Companies aligned with the Paris Agreement's goals may experience increased demand for their products and services. Meanwhile, industries reliant on fossil fuels might face challenges as policies aim to transition towards a low-carbon economy. These industries could see increased regulatory costs or be incentivized to innovate and diversify.

State and local governments stand to gain from federal support and guidance in implementing policies that promote sustainability. However, the resolution's lack of specific policy endorsements may lead to diverging approaches among states, especially those with economies heavily based on fossil fuels. These regions might encounter political resistance and economic obstacles as they reconcile with the broader national and global objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Overall, while the resolution portrays a strong, unified message towards climate action, the lack of specificity in the resolution could pose challenges to ensuring coherent and effective policy outcomes across the United States.

Issues

  • The section lacks specific actions or measures, leading to potential ambiguity in how the objectives of the Paris Agreement will be implemented at the federal, state, and local levels. This could result in inconsistency and confusion among various entities expected to comply with undefined expectations.

  • The financial commitments required by staying a party to the Paris Agreement and supporting its objectives are not quantified, which might lead to significant unplanned financial implications for the United States and its subnational actors.

  • The intent to support businesses, investors, and society in taking climate change action is vague and does not outline specific responsibilities or mechanisms, which might cause confusion regarding expectations and obligations.

  • By not specifying which federal, state, or local policies are supported, the section opens the door for varying interpretations that could undermine cohesive policy implementation.

  • The general commitment to the Paris Agreement may conflict with other political or economic objectives within the United States, especially in regions where fossil fuel industries are dominant, potentially leading to political and social controversies.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

(1) Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Senate believes that the United States should stay part of the Paris Agreement, support efforts at all government levels to reduce global warming pollution, and back the actions of businesses and society in tackling climate change.