Overview

Title

Designating March 6, 2025, as “National Slam the Scam Day” to raise awareness about pervasive scams and to promote education to prevent government imposter scams and other types of scams.

ELI5 AI

S. RES. 118 wants everyone to remember March 6, 2025, as a day to learn about and stop bad people pretending to be workers from the government, which can trick people and take their money, especially older folks. It encourages sharing info about these tricks to help keep everyone safe.

Summary AI

S. RES. 118 designates March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day" to raise awareness about scams where individuals pretend to be government employees, known as government imposter scams. The resolution highlights the significant financial losses these scams cause, particularly to older adults, and encourages programs to prevent and educate people about these scams. It acknowledges the important roles of law enforcement, consumer protection groups, and other entities in combating these scams and encourages individuals to report and share information about them.

Published

2025-03-06
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Agreed to Senate
Date: 2025-03-06
Package ID: BILLS-119sres118ats

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
466
Pages:
4
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 171
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 15
Entities: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.29
Average Sentence Length:
77.67
Token Entropy:
4.53
Readability (ARI):
40.82

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The resolution being considered by the U.S. Senate, designated as S. RES. 118, aims to establish March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day." The primary objective of this day is to raise awareness about the pervasive issue of scams, particularly those where scammers impersonate government officials. Such scams often target vulnerable individuals, costing consumers billions of dollars each year. The resolution invites stakeholders, including law enforcement and consumer protection groups, to play pivotal roles in protecting the public and promoting education about these scams. Additionally, it encourages individual members of the public to be vigilant against scams and report any suspicious activities to the appropriate authorities.

Summary of Significant Issues

Despite the resolution's noble intentions, several notable areas of concern arise. First, the resolution lacks any appropriation of funds or budgetary considerations to support the proposed awareness initiatives, potentially leading to inconsistent implementation in areas needing additional resources. Secondly, it remains unclear which governmental body or entity will be responsible for coordinating these efforts. This ambiguity may result in disorganization and reduce the potential effectiveness of the strategies intended to tackle scams. Furthermore, while it encourages the public to ignore scam solicitations, there is no guidance on distinguishing real communications from legitimate government sources, which is essential to maintaining trust in public services. Another oversight is the absence of specific metrics or benchmarks for evaluating the success of these awareness programs, making it difficult to judge their actual impact. Finally, while the resolution acknowledges collaboration among different organizations, it does not specify how these efforts are recognized or encouraged in practice.

Impact on the Public

The establishment of a "National Slam the Scam Day" has the potential to positively impact public awareness and educate individuals about the dangers of scams. By highlighting the economic and emotional toll that scams take, this initiative could foster greater community resilience and knowledge. However, without specific funding and clear guidance on program implementation, the effectiveness of these initiatives may vary widely across different regions. This inconsistency could exacerbate existing disparities in scam prevention efforts, particularly in areas lacking adequate resources.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders, the resolution could have varying impacts. Law enforcement agencies and consumer protection groups are likely to experience increased pressure to enhance their participation in scam prevention efforts, without necessarily receiving additional resources or guidance from the government. Financial institutions and telecommunications companies might also feel the need to improve their protective measures against scams but would benefit from clearer collaboration guidelines.

Conversely, members of the general public, particularly older adults who are frequently targeted by scammers, might feel more empowered and secure knowing that there is a national effort backing them. Yet, without proper educational resources and tools to differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent communications, there is a risk of confusion that could undermine trust in essential government communications.

In conclusion, while the resolution sets a constructive precedent for increasing awareness and promoting education on scam prevention, its potential impact is compromised by a lack of detailed implementation strategies and investment in resources necessary to support these initiatives comprehensively.

Issues

  • The resolution does not provide information about any allocated spending or budgetary considerations for implementing policies or awareness programs, which might lead to inconsistent execution across different areas. This is significant as without clear funding, the effectiveness and reach of these initiatives could be compromised, particularly in areas that require more resources. [Section (1)]

  • The resolution does not specify which legislative body or existing government entity will oversee and coordinate the implementation of the suggested policies and programs. This lack of clarity could lead to confusion and inefficiencies, potentially reducing the impact of the initiatives intended to combat scams. [Section (1)]

  • The resolution's encouragement for members of the public to ignore solicitations does not provide guidance on ensuring the public can differentiate between legitimate and scam communications from government agencies. This gap is crucial as it affects public trust and could lead to confusion or missed communications. [Section (1)]

  • There is no mention of any specific metrics or benchmarks to evaluate the effectiveness of the awareness programs or protective measures recommended by the resolution. The absence of these metrics makes it difficult to assess whether the programs are successful, which might affect future funding and policy decisions. [Section (1)]

  • The resolution acknowledges the role of various organizations and institutions in combating scams but lacks clarity on how these entities are encouraged or recognized practically in terms of collaboration or support. The effectiveness of collective action against scams could be undermined without clear guidelines or incentives for collaboration. [Section (1)]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

(1) Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Senate has designated March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day" to raise awareness about scams where people pretend to be government employees. They emphasize the importance of law enforcement, consumer protection groups, and others in stopping these scams and urge the public to ignore fake communications from scammers, report scams to the proper authorities, and share scam-related information with others.