Overview
Title
To direct the termination of the use of United States Armed Forces for the construction, maintenance, and operation of the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore pier on the coast of the Gaza Strip that has not been authorized by Congress.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the President to stop using the U.S. military to work on a special building project near Gaza's beach in 30 days unless Congress says it's okay to keep going. This decision won't stop the U.S. from working with Israel.
Summary AI
S. J. RES. 89 orders the end of using U.S. military forces for constructing, maintaining, and running a logistics pier on Gaza Strip's coast unless Congress has specifically allowed it. The President must stop these military activities within 30 days after this resolution's approval unless Congress permits an extension. This resolution doesn't restrict cooperation between the U.S. military and Israel.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed joint resolution, S. J. RES. 89, seeks to direct the termination of the use of United States Armed Forces in the construction, maintenance, and operation of a logistics pier located on the coast of the Gaza Strip. This action is mandated to occur within 30 days following the adoption of the resolution unless the President requests and Congress provides specific authorization to extend this period. The resolution emphasizes that this termination does not impede ongoing cooperation between the United States Armed Forces and the State of Israel.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues emerge from the bill. Firstly, it lacks a clear rationale or justification for ending the project, leaving questions about its necessity and its potential impacts on national and international relations. Secondly, the financial implications of halting the project are not addressed, including potential sunk costs or penalties that could result in wasteful spending. Additionally, the provision for the President to request an extension lacks criteria, risking inconsistent applications. The bill’s language about what constitutes "specific authorization" is vague, possibly leading to legal ambiguities. Finally, the text does not specify how ongoing contracts or agreements related to the pier will be handled, which could lead to financial or legal issues.
Impact on the Public and Broad Stakeholders
The direct impact on the average citizen may be minimal, as the resolution deals primarily with military operations and international projects. However, the financial consequences of terminating a significant project without addressing potential costs could impact taxpayers if there are fiscal losses. Questions about the project's necessity and the potential for wasted resources may concern those interested in government transparency and accountability.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The resolution affects multiple stakeholders, starting with the armed forces involved in the project, who would need to redirect their efforts. Contractors and businesses with ongoing engagements related to the pier might face financial losses or contractual disputes, affecting their operations and the livelihoods of associated employees.
Internationally, the resolution could affect relations with allies, particularly Israel, if the pier’s operation was perceived as a joint-interest project. It might also send signals to the global community about the United States's commitment to or withdrawal from certain international infrastructure projects. Local entities in Gaza could see reduced functionality or support if the pier was providing substantial logistic support, impacting humanitarian or trade efforts.
By addressing these concerns, Congress and the President can work together to clarify the project’s importance, financial implications, and diplomatic outcomes while considering broader security and international relations strategies.
Issues
The text does not provide a clear rationale or justification for the termination of the use of United States Armed Forces in this project. This lack of explanation makes it challenging to determine whether the resolution serves national security or international relations interests. (Section 1.)
There is no detailed information about the financial implications of terminating the project. Potential sunk costs, penalties, and potential wasteful spending are not addressed, which could have significant fiscal impacts. (Section 1.)
The provision allowing the President to request and Congress to authorize a later termination date is vague, as it lacks criteria or guidelines for what constitutes a valid reason for such requests. This could lead to inconsistent applications and lack of accountability. (Section 1., Subsection (a))
The phrase 'unless specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces has been enacted' is vague without further explanation, leading to potential legal ambiguities about what constitutes 'specific authorization'. (Section 1., Subsection (a))
The text does not specify what will happen to any ongoing contracts or agreements related to the pier's construction, maintenance, and operation. This omission could result in financial or legal complications. (Section 1.)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Termination of use of United States Armed Forces for construction, maintenance, and operation of the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore pier on the coast of the Gaza Strip Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress is directing the President to stop using the United States Armed Forces for building and running a logistics pier on the Gaza Strip coast within 30 days of adopting the resolution, unless later use is specifically authorized, while still allowing collaboration with Israel.