Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.
ELI5 AI
S. J. RES. 80 is about a decision by people in the government to say "no" to a new rule that was made to protect certain kinds of animals and plants. They want to stop the rule, so it won't be used anymore.
Summary AI
S. J. RES. 80 is a resolution that seeks to cancel a rule made by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The rule pertains to regulations for endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. The resolution, introduced by Senator Lummis and co-sponsored by other senators, expresses Congress's disapproval of this rule. If passed, the rule will have no legal effect.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill under discussion is a joint resolution introduced in the 118th Congress, specifically identified as Senate Joint Resolution 80 (S. J. RES. 80). The resolution seeks Congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service concerning the regulations for endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. The summary indicates that the bill aims to reject a rule that had been formally published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2024. If disapproved, this rule will have no legal force or effect.
Significant Issues
One major issue with the resolution is its lack of detailed content and clarity. The bill text is incomplete; for one of its sections, it only contains the fragmentary word "That," without any subsequent information. This omission makes it challenging to understand the full scope and implications of the bill.
Additionally, the resolution does not specify why the referenced rule is being disapproved. Without a rationale, it becomes difficult for the public and stakeholders to understand the motivations behind the resolution or the nature of the content it is rejecting. This lack of transparency could lead to confusion and debate about the bill’s intent.
Furthermore, the bill refers to a federal register notice, "89 Fed. Reg. 23919 (April 5, 2024)," without providing context or details from that document. This assumption that readers have access to or familiarity with this reference could limit understanding and engagement among those who are not aware of it.
Broad Public Impact
The potential impact of this bill on the general public could be significant, particularly regarding environmental regulation and conservation efforts. By nullifying a rule from the Fish and Wildlife Service related to endangered and threatened species, the resolution could influence policies that affect biodiversity and habitat protection efforts. This could lead to public discourse on how best to balance environmental conservation with other legislative priorities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental groups and conservationists, this bill might represent a setback. The disapproval of a protective rule could hinder efforts to protect vulnerable wildlife and plant species, potentially leading to ecological consequences. On the other side, industries and businesses that face regulatory constraints due to environmental rules might view this resolution favorably, seeing it as a reduction of regulatory burden that could lead to increased operational flexibility.
Local communities that depend on biodiversity, whether for tourism, research, or ecological balance, might express concern over the long-term consequences of diluting protections for endangered species and habitats. However, communities that prioritize economic development might support the resolution if it aligns with interests in reducing regulatory barriers.
In conclusion, S. J. RES. 80's lack of detail and context makes it challenging to evaluate fully, but its implications on wildlife conservation and regulatory policy are notable. The resolution invites scrutiny from various stakeholders while potentially influencing environmental and regulatory frameworks.
Issues
The bill text is incomplete; it only contains the word 'That' for a section, which leaves a lack of content to review for potential legal, political, or ethical issues. This makes it impossible to understand the full implications of the bill. (Section 1)
The language in the bill lacks clarity about the specific rule it disapproves, which could lead to confusion among those not familiar with the referenced regulation. (Section 2)
There is no detailed rationale provided for disapproving the rule, creating ambiguity about the reasons and the intent behind the resolution. This lack of rationale may lead to political and public debate. (Section 2)
The references made to '89 Fed. Reg. 23919 (April 5, 2024)' assume that readers have access to or are familiar with this document. This could limit understanding and involvement from stakeholders who are not aware of or cannot access this reference. (Section 2)
The potential consequences or implications of disapproving this rule are not mentioned, leading to uncertainty regarding its effects on endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. This is particularly important due to the ecological and ethical considerations involved. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text provided for summarization is incomplete and does not contain enough information to generate a meaningful summary of a bill section.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has rejected a rule from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service about regulations for endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, meaning the rule will not take effect.