Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measure.
ELI5 AI
Congress made a decision to stop a new rule about how they check traffic and pollution on highways, saying they didn't agree with it and want it to go away.
Summary AI
S. J. Res. 61 is a resolution that aims to cancel a rule from the Federal Highway Administration. This rule relates to how the performance of the National Highway System is measured, particularly concerning greenhouse gas emissions. By passing this resolution, Congress is expressing its disapproval and ensuring that the rule will not take effect. The resolution was passed by the Senate on April 10, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The resolution, S. J. RES. 61, is a legislative move by the 118th United States Congress to disapprove a specific rule. This rule was put forth by the Federal Highway Administration and concerns the "National Performance Management Measures" related to the performance of the national highway system and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. The resolution expresses Congress's decision that this rule should not be implemented and have no legal effect.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are a few notable concerns surrounding this resolution. First, the language used in the document is somewhat complex, which may make it difficult for the general public to fully grasp the implications of the disapproval. The detailed legislative language can be a barrier in terms of public understanding and engagement.
Moreover, the resolution lacks a clear explanation as to why the rule is disapproved. This absence of rationale could lead to transparency issues, as stakeholders and citizens may not be informed about the specific reasons motivating this legislative decision. The resolution does not delve into any supposed shortcomings or criticisms of the rule, leaving a gap in public understanding.
Public Impact
From a broader perspective, this resolution might result in varied reactions from the public. For those interested in environmental policies and measures, the disapproval might seem like a step backward in terms of monitoring and managing greenhouse gas emissions on national highways. On the other hand, individuals or groups who believe that federal regulations in this area are excessive may view this disapproval as a positive move towards reducing government oversight and interference.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The resolution could have differing effects on various stakeholders. Environmental advocacy organizations might perceive the disapproval negatively, as they often push for stringent measures to track and reduce emissions. These groups might argue that without such monitoring, efforts to mitigate climate change could be stalled or undermined.
Conversely, transportation industry stakeholders, particularly those concerned about regulatory burdens, may welcome the disapproval. They could argue that removing the rule reduces unnecessary bureaucratic requirements, potentially lowering costs and increasing efficiency in highway management and operations.
In essence, the impact of this resolution can vary significantly depending on one's perspective. While it halts a regulatory measure purportedly aimed at enhancing environmental oversight, it simultaneously eases potential regulatory pressures for those involved in highway management and logistics. The divergent views highlight the complexity of balancing environmental objectives with industry concerns.
Issues
The bill text contains complex language, which may hinder the general public's understanding of the implications and processes involved in the disapproval of the rule. Communicating legislative intentions and specifics in a clearer manner is crucial for transparency and public engagement. [Section: Issues - Complexity of language]
The resolution does not specifically explain why the disapproved rule 'shall have no force or effect.' This lack of detail presents transparency issues, as stakeholders and the public may not understand the rationale behind rejecting the measure. Providing a detailed explanation of the reasons for disapproval is essential for informed discourse. [Section: Issues - Lack of justification]
There is no clear articulation of the specific reasons for disapproving the Federal Highway Administration's rule, which may lead to confusion and speculation about the motivations behind Congress's decision. This omission creates a gap in legislative accountability and might provoke public or stakeholder dissent. [Section: Issues - Lack of clarity on the issue]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has decided to reject a rule from the Federal Highway Administration about measuring the performance of highways and tracking greenhouse gas emissions. This means the rule will not be put into effect.