Overview

Title

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress.

ELI5 AI

S. J. RES. 48 is a plan to make a new rule that would limit how long people can be part of the U.S. Congress. It says that someone can only be in the House of Representatives for 12 years and in the Senate for 12 years, starting from a certain point in time.

Summary AI

S. J. RES. 48 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to set term limits for members of Congress. If passed, it would limit individuals to serving no more than six two-year terms in the House of Representatives and no more than two six-year terms in the Senate. The resolution specifies that serving more than one year of a House term or more than three years of a Senate term will count as a full term. This amendment would not apply to anyone who served before the 118th Congress.

Published

2025-04-10
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-04-10
Package ID: BILLS-119sjres48is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
367
Pages:
2
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 104
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 19
Entities: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
30.58
Token Entropy:
4.51
Readability (ARI):
17.44

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed joint resolution, S.J. RES. 48, suggests an amendment to the U.S. Constitution aiming to introduce term limits for Congressional members. If this amendment passes, a person could serve as a Representative for up to six terms, with each term lasting two years. For Senators, the cap is set at two terms, each being six years long. The amendment also specifies that serving more than half of a term—which is one year for Representatives and three years for Senators—will count as a full term. Crucially, these regulations will not apply to anyone who served in Congress before the 118th Congress.

Significant Issues

Several key issues could impact the interpretation and application of this amendment. Firstly, the lack of an established enforcement mechanism could lead to challenges in monitoring adherence to these limits. Secondly, the details surrounding partial terms create an ambiguity that might be confusing, especially in cases of special elections or appointments. Additionally, the amendment's exclusion of pre-118th Congress members raises potential fairness concerns, as it grants them an exemption from these rules. Furthermore, the phraseology used within the bill, such as "without regard to whether the service was completed by the individual originally elected to the term," may need further definition to prevent misinterpretation.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this bill could alter the political landscape by limiting the long-term incumbency often seen in Congress, potentially encouraging diversity and fresh perspectives in legislative processes. This may appeal to voters favoring reform and seeking to mitigate the perceived stagnation caused by career politicians. However, it could also lead to a loss of experienced lawmakers, which might affect the efficiency of legislative operations.

Specific stakeholders, such as seasoned politicians, might be negatively impacted as their tenure would be capped. New candidates could benefit, as term limits may provide openings that weren’t as accessible in previous scenarios dominated by entrenched incumbents. State legislatures would also play a crucial role in ratifying this amendment; their engagement is vital for its passage. Consequently, the manner in which this amendment is perceived and implemented could vary substantially across different states, affecting both party dynamics and election strategies.

Issues

  • The lack of an enforcement mechanism for how compliance with the term limits is monitored or enforced could lead to issues with practical application of the amendment. This is highlighted in Section 2.

  • The proposed amendment's provision that 'Service as a Representative for more than one year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term' might lead to complexity in interpreting term limits, which may impact incumbency advantages and reduce opportunities for new candidates. This is mentioned in Section 1.

  • Ambiguity exists in defining what constitutes a complete term, especially regarding partial term service due to appointments or special elections to fill vacancies, particularly if these terms are less than three years. This issue is discussed in Section 2.

  • The amendment's applicability only to individuals from the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress onward may introduce fairness concerns, as it exempts previous congress members. This is a concern raised in Section 3.

  • There is a lack of clarity in communicating the transition for those who served in Congress before the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, as the document may be confusing for readers unfamiliar with congressional session numbering. This issue is present in Sections 1 and 3.

  • The language used for term limits such as 'without regard to whether the service was completed by the individual originally elected to the term' may require further clarification to avoid misinterpretations. This issue is spotted in both Section 1 and Section 2.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution introduces term limits for members of Congress: Representatives can serve up to six two-year terms, and Senators can serve up to two six-year terms. It also specifies that serving most of a term counts as a full term, but these rules don't apply to officials who served before the 118th Congress.

1. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A person can serve as a Representative for up to six terms, each lasting two years. If they serve more than one year of any two-year term, it counts as a full term, even if someone else was originally elected for that term.

2. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A person can only be a Senator for a maximum of two six-year terms. If someone serves more than three years of a single six-year term, it counts as a whole term, even if they weren't the one elected to start that term.

3. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the rules outlined in the article do not apply to anyone who served as a Representative or Senator in any Congress that took place before the 118th Congress.