Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing.
ELI5 AI
S. J. RES. 24 is a proposal from some senators that says they want to stop an environmental rule about making rubber tires because they don't like it. If they succeed, the rule won't be used anymore and the way tire factories manage pollution will stay the same.
Summary AI
S. J. RES. 24 is a joint resolution that seeks to express Congress's disapproval of a specific rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule is related to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants concerning rubber tire manufacturing. If passed, the resolution would ensure that the EPA's rule, published on November 29, 2024, will not have any legal effect. The resolution was introduced by several senators, including Mr. Scott of South Carolina, and has been referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, S.J. RES. 24, represents a congressional effort to disapprove a specific rule set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule is related to the "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing." Essentially, Congress is expressing its disagreement with this EPA rule and declares that it should not be enacted or enforced.
Summary of Significant Issues
One noteworthy issue in this resolution is the reference to a future date, November 29, 2024, as the publication date for the rule in the Federal Register. This raises concerns about the accuracy and legitimacy of the document being referenced, as resolutions typically disapprove past or current rules, not future ones.
Another important aspect is the lack of context for why Congress wants to disapprove the rule. Without a clear explanation, there could be misunderstandings regarding the motivations or the necessity behind this decision. This can affect public perception and trust.
The resolution also does not offer insights into any financial implications or costs associated with the disapproval. This omission can be significant since both governmental agencies and industries could face financial impacts from this decision.
Furthermore, there is no discussion of how this disapproval might affect air pollution control measures or the industries involved. Stakeholders are left without crucial information on potential impacts this decision could have on environmental protection efforts.
Finally, the straightforward language stating that the rule shall have no force or effect lacks details on the immediate regulatory consequences or changes to enforcement practices that might arise from this disapproval.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the bill may evoke questions regarding environmental protection and air quality standards. Air pollution controls are often implemented to protect public health, so disapproving such regulations could lead to concerns about the potential increase in pollution and associated health risks. The lack of detailed reasoning in the bill might create confusion and uncertainty among citizens about the broader environmental policies and priorities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Industries involved in rubber tire manufacturing may see this bill as positive, as disapproval of the rule could relieve them from potential regulatory burdens that usually come with compliance to stricter environmental standards. This could provide financial reprieve in terms of reduced compliance costs.
On the contrary, environmental advocacy groups might view this resolution in a negative light. The disapproval could be seen as a setback to efforts aimed at reducing harmful emissions and protecting environmental and public health.
Overall, while the bill might streamline operations for certain industries, it introduces ambiguity and potential risks related to environmental health protections that are of concern to the broader public and environmental stakeholders.
Issues
The date 'November 29, 2024' used in the resolution reference is a future date, which raises important questions about the accuracy and legitimacy of the document being referenced. This could impact the legal basis for the disapproval. [SECTIONS]
There is a lack of context provided for the disapproval of the EPA's rule on National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing. This lack of rationale can lead to misunderstanding the motivation or the necessity behind the disapproval, potentially affecting public perception and trust. [SECTIONS]
The resolution does not discuss any financial implications or potential costs related to the disapproval of this rule, which might be significant for both the government and the industries affected. This omission could have financial consequences that are not immediately apparent. [SECTIONS]
The document fails to explain the possible impact of disapproving the rule on air pollution control measures or on the industries involved, leaving stakeholders without crucial information on how it may affect environmental protection efforts. [SECTIONS]
The language that states 'such rule shall have no force or effect' is clear in its intention but does not elaborate on the immediate regulatory consequences or enforcement changes that could arise from this decision. [SECTIONS]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress disagrees with a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency about air pollution standards for rubber tire manufacturing, and they have decided that this rule will not be put into effect.