Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions.
ELI5 AI
This bill says that the Senate wants to cancel a rule made by the EPA about charging for pollution from gas and oil companies because they don't agree with it. They think this rule should not affect any laws.
Summary AI
S. J. RES. 122 is a resolution introduced in the United States Senate that seeks to nullify a specific rule set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule involves the "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems" and outlines procedures for compliance, including exceptions like netting. The resolution expresses congressional disapproval of the EPA's rule, stating that it should have no legal effect.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The resolution, labeled as S. J. RES. 122, is a legislative proposal involving congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains specifically to the management of waste emissions from petroleum and natural gas systems, which includes procedures like "Netting and Exemptions." This resolution, having been introduced in the U.S. Senate, seeks to nullify the EPA's rule, meaning that if passed, the rule would not be enforced or implemented.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill invokes Congress's authority under a particular chapter of the U.S. Code to disapprove rules enacted by federal agencies. Here, the target is an EPA rule established to address waste emissions charges for petroleum and natural gas systems. The introduction of this resolution suggests a significant congressional stance against the EPA's recent regulatory efforts in this area.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several critical issues arise from the text of the resolution. Firstly, the resolution does not elucidate the underlying reasons for Congress's disapproval, leaving a gap in the understanding of the motivations behind this legislative action. Additionally, it does not detail the potential environmental or economic consequences of rejecting the rule, which is critical information for the public and stakeholders.
Furthermore, the citation of the federal register, where the rule is documented, may be obscured to those unfamiliar with such references, reducing the resolution's accessibility to the lay public. Moreover, aspects of the rule described as "Netting and Exemptions" lack clarity, further clouding the overall impact and intent of the rule itself.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the disapproval of this EPA rule could have far-reaching implications. At its core, the resolution disallowing EPA's rule may affect environmental protections by modifying how emissions from petroleum and natural gas systems are managed. This could potentially contribute to broader environmental ramifications, such as increased pollution if emission controls are not adequately regulated. Conversely, some may view the resolution as a way to curb regulatory overreach that might place undue burden on industries.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, particularly those in the petroleum and natural gas industry, could perceive this resolution as beneficial, possibly relieving some regulatory pressures and financial burdens associated with compliance to the EPA's emissions rule. However, environmental advocacy groups may view this resolution negatively, interpreting it as a step back in federal efforts to regulate emissions and mitigate environmental damage.
The lack of explicit detail on both the rationale behind the disapproval and the broader consequences of this legislative action remains a key concern. Stakeholders and the public could benefit from greater transparency and detailed explanations to better understand the implications of this resolution. As discussions around environmental policy and industrial regulation continue, such legislative efforts will undoubtedly remain at the center of public and political discourse.
Issues
The lack of detail regarding Congress's specific disapproval reasons for the EPA rule on Waste Emissions Charge could lead to political controversy and public confusion, as constituents may not understand the motivations behind the resolution. This lack of transparency is found in the absence of details in the section that disapproves the rule.
The potential environmental and economic consequences of disapproving the rule are not discussed in the resolution, leaving critical stakeholders uninformed about the possible impacts on environmental protection and the petroleum and natural gas industry. This oversight is present in the resolution text at large.
The reference to federal register citation '89 Fed. Reg. 91094' without explanation may be obscure to the general public or non-experts, leading to a lack of accessibility and understanding of the context of the rule being disapproved. This is evidenced by the section that references the federal register directly.
The procedural aspects like 'Netting and Exemptions' are not explained, which could prevent the readers from appreciating the importance or impact of the described procedures, potentially leading to a misunderstanding of the rule's significance. This issue is highlighted by the lack of context provided in discussing 'Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions.'
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has decided not to approve a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency that deals with managing waste emissions from petroleum and natural gas systems, meaning the rule won’t be implemented or enforced.