Overview
Title
Providing for corrections in the enrollment of S. 4367.
ELI5 AI
In a resolution, imagine they're fixing typos and replacing words in a big rulebook about taking care of water, rivers, and harbors, so that everyone understands who pays for what and that there's no mix-up like saying "food" when they really mean "flood."
Summary AI
The resolution, S. CON. RES. 46, addresses corrections to the enrollment of S. 4367, which is concerned with improvements to U.S. rivers and harbors, and the conservation and development of water resources. It makes specific wording changes to sections of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to clarify terms related to funding and planning processes. These corrections include changing phrases like "maximum Federal cost" to "Federal share of the cost" and "food" to "flood," ensuring the Act's language accurately reflects its intentions and directives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The resolution discussed here, S. Con. Res. 46, is a legislative document that aims to correct certain language and terminology in the enrollment of a bill known as S. 4367. This bill is focused on the improvement and development of the United States' rivers and harbors, as well as the conservation and development of water resources. The corrections are mostly technical and relate to the language used in the bill references, which are primarily amendments to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. These changes ensure that the bill's language accurately reflects the legislative intent and responsibilities involved.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the proposed changes within the bill. Notably, altering terms like "maximum Federal cost" to "Federal share of the cost" may have implications for how financial responsibilities are distributed between federal and other partners. This change could potentially affect funding allocation and require a clear understanding of the financial impacts on ongoing and future projects.
Another important correction involves changing "Reconnaissance study" to "Pre-design planning costs." This adjustment suggests a shift in focus from initial assessments to more detailed planning stages, which may impact project timelines and funding needs. Furthermore, the correction of typographical errors, such as changing "food" to "flood," needs careful consideration to ensure it aligns with the legislative intent, especially in contexts as crucial as disaster management.
Impact on the Public
The broad public impact of this resolution lies in its potential influence on the development and management of national water resources. Accurate language in legal documents is crucial to avoiding misunderstandings and ensuring effective implementation of projects. By clarifying funding structures and correcting typographical errors, the bill aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of water resource development projects, which can lead to improved infrastructure, enhanced flood control, and better conservation efforts.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders affected by this resolution include federal agencies, local governments, and project contractors involved in water resource management and infrastructure development. For federal agencies, the clarity in funding terminology could affect budget planning and project prioritization. Local governments and contractors might also experience changes in project scope or funding expectations, necessitating adjustments in planning and resource allocation.
Overall, while the resolution mainly addresses technical language corrections, these changes are crucial in ensuring that the legislative framework functions smoothly. Stakeholders will need to closely review these amendments to understand how they may influence their operational strategies and project implementations.
Issues
The terminology change in paragraph (2) of section 203(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(d)), from 'maximum Federal cost' to 'Federal share of the cost', could have implications for the funding or scope of projects. This change might affect the allocation of federal funds and require additional clarification to ensure that the intent and financial impact are transparent and understood by stakeholders.
The use of legal references such as 'section 203(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(d))' introduces complexity and may be difficult for the general public to understand without additional context. These references might require a consolidated summary to clarify the amendments and provide a comprehensive understanding of changes being made.
The change in section 204(c)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 from 'United States funds' to 'United States' may seem minor but requires careful examination to ensure that such changes do not unintentionally alter the legal requirements or outcomes of the referenced provisions.
The language change in section 1203(a)(1) from 'food' to 'flood' could signify a significant typographical error that needs confirmation and careful review as such errors might inadvertently alter the scope or intention of legislative measures that pertain to critical areas like disaster management or infrastructure improvements.
Altering the term 'Reconnaissance study' to 'Pre-design planning costs' in paragraph (2) of section 1113(d) alters the language used in conducting initial project assessments and might reflect a shift in focus or scope in planning processes that warrants further examination to understand its implications on water resource projects.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
(1) Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines corrections to S. 4367, a bill related to U.S. water resources development, specifying changes to terminology and language in various sections to accurately describe financial responsibilities and clarify text related to planning and flood management.