Overview
Title
Recognizing the need to improve physical access to many federally funded facilities for all people of the United States, particularly people with disabilities.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about making sure that all buildings paid for by the government are easy for everyone to get into and use, especially people who have disabilities. It says we should follow rules that have been around a long time and make new ones so that everyone can move around and use things equally.
Summary AI
S. CON. RES. 31 is a resolution in the U.S. Senate that acknowledges the ongoing challenges faced by people with disabilities in accessing federally funded facilities. It highlights the importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, and urges full compliance with these laws. The resolution commits Congress to prioritize universal and inclusive design in infrastructure projects to ensure equal access for all citizens, including those with disabilities. It stresses the need for greater accessibility as part of the nation's founding values of equality and freedom.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled S. CON. RES. 31, is a concurrent resolution introduced in the Senate to address the need for improved physical access to federally funded facilities across the United States, with a focus on people with disabilities. It highlights the importance of ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their physical abilities, can access public amenities and infrastructures. The resolution acknowledges existing laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, reaffirms support for these legislations, and emphasizes the importance of universal and inclusive design in infrastructure projects to eliminate accessibility barriers.
Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with this resolution is its lack of specificity in terms of funding allocations. The resolution does not detail any budgetary provisions or financial resources to support its objectives, which raises questions about its feasibility and how the proposed improvements would be economically secured. Another issue is the absence of a clear definition of "universal and inclusive design," which could result in varied interpretations and inconsistent application of accessibility improvements across different projects.
Additionally, the resolution does not specify particular organizations or individuals who might benefit or be responsible for implementing these improvements, potentially overlooking stakeholders essential for successful rollouts. Finally, while the resolution emphasizes ongoing efforts to identify and eliminate accessibility barriers, it lacks concrete plans, timelines, or metrics for tracking progress, leaving its accountability ambiguous.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly, the resolution aims to positively impact the U.S. public by promoting access equity to federally funded facilities, thereby supporting the rights of people with disabilities and conforming to principles of freedom and equality. If effectively implemented, the resolution could lead to enhanced participation of people with disabilities in various aspects of public life, promoting inclusivity and reducing discrimination based on physical ability.
Potential Impact on Stakeholders
For people with disabilities, the resolution presents a step toward increased recognition and accommodation of their needs, potentially improving their quality of life by removing physical access barriers. Veterans receiving service-related disability benefits might also experience enhanced accessibility to vital federal services resulting from this resolution.
However, without a clear implementation strategy or defined funding, various stakeholders, such as government agencies and contractors tasked with infrastructure projects, might find themselves navigating ambiguities in execution. Additionally, the lack of clear beneficiaries or responsible parties could result in uneven application of improvements, benefiting some regions or groups over others and inadvertently excluding stakeholders who need these changes the most.
In conclusion, while the resolution underscores a vital commitment to accessibility, its effectiveness will depend on subsequent policy developments and concrete implementation strategies to transform its aspirations into tangible benefits for all citizens.
Issues
The bill does not specify any particular budget or spending amount for improving physical access, making it difficult to identify potential wasteful spending. Without specific funding allocations, it is unclear how the resolution's goals will be financially supported. (Section: Issues - Budget)
There is no mention of specific organizations or individuals that might benefit from the resolution, making it unclear if any particular entities are favored by the language. This lack of clarity can lead to potential biases or unintended preferences. (Section: Issues - Beneficiaries)
The phrase 'universal and inclusive design' is not clearly defined within the resolution, leading to potential ambiguity in its interpretation and application across infrastructure projects. This could result in inconsistent implementation of accessibility standards. (Section: Issues - Language Clarity)
The commitment to 'continue working to identify and remove the barriers' lacks details on how these efforts will be practically implemented or measured, raising questions about the effectiveness and accountability in achieving the resolution's goals. Without specific metrics or timelines, progress may be difficult to track and ensure. (Section: Issues - Implementation and Measurement)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges that people with disabilities face daily access challenges, supports existing disability laws, and commits to making design inclusive in infrastructure projects to ensure equal access to federal services for everyone in the United States.