Overview

Title

To repeal a rule of the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to multi-pollutant emissions standards, to amend the Clean Air Act to ensure that tailpipe regulations do not limit the availability of new motor vehicles, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 995 is a plan to change some rules about car pollution to make sure different kinds of new cars, like those with regular engines, can still be sold, and it asks the people in charge to quickly update their rules in the next two years.

Summary AI

S. 995 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress, which proposes the repeal of a rule by the Environmental Protection Agency that sets multi-pollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles starting with the 2027 model year. The bill, known as the "Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Clean Air Act to ensure that regulations do not restrict the availability of new motor vehicles based on the type of engine they have or mandate the use of specific technologies. If enacted, the EPA would be required to update its regulations accordingly within two years.

Published

2025-03-12
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-12
Package ID: BILLS-119s995is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
590
Pages:
3
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 197
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 20
Entities: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.91
Average Sentence Length:
39.33
Token Entropy:
4.77
Readability (ARI):
19.82

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The "Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act of 2025," currently under review in the 119th Congress, aims to repeal a specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule and amend an existing environmental law, the Clean Air Act. The primary goals are to eliminate the EPA's multi-pollutant emissions standards for certain vehicles and to ensure that future emission regulations don't limit the types of new motor vehicles available on the market. The bill specifies that regulations should not dictate the use of specific technologies or restrict vehicle availability based on engine types.

Significant Issues

Several notable issues arise from this bill. In Section 2, the rationale behind repealing the multi-pollutant emissions standards is not clearly articulated, raising questions about the environmental and economic consequences. This lack of clarity can undermine transparency and may result in policy decisions that are not well-informed. Further, the repeal could create a regulatory void, potentially leading to increased pollution due to the absence of alternative emission control measures.

Section 3 introduces amendments to ensure vehicle emission regulations do not impose specific technologies or restrict vehicle availability; however, the terminology used is vague. For instance, phrases such as "specific technology" and "limited availability of new motor vehicles" are undefined and could lead to various interpretations, potentially causing enforcement difficulties and legal challenges. Additionally, the 24-month timeline for revising the regulations, although providing flexibility, might delay vital regulatory updates, hindering timely responses to environmental and technological advancements.

Broad Public Impact

The bill has the potential to impact the general public significantly. By repealing existing emissions standards without clear replacements, there might be negative environmental repercussions, including increased air pollution. This could affect public health, particularly for communities already experiencing poor air quality. On the other hand, broadening the variety of available vehicles, as the bill intends, could benefit consumers by offering more choices aligned with personal preferences or financial constraints.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as automobile manufacturers, the bill could have both positive and negative implications. The repeal of emissions standards may reduce costs and regulatory burdens, potentially making vehicle production faster and cheaper. However, environmental groups and health advocates are likely to express concerns about the potential environmental impact, emphasizing the importance of maintaining rigorous standards to ensure air quality and public health.

Policy makers may find themselves at a crossroads, balancing industry interests with environmental responsibilities. The vagueness and potential loopholes within the bill might lead to contentious legal battles, particularly concerning the interpretation of unspecified terms. Additionally, there could be challenges aligning this bill with broader environmental goals, such as those under international climate agreements.

In conclusion, while the "Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act of 2025" aims to broaden consumer choice and ease regulatory pressures on the auto industry, it raises significant concerns regarding environmental standards and policy clarity. Stakeholders across the spectrum will need to engage in robust dialogue to ensure the bill's outcomes align with broader societal and environmental objectives.

Issues

  • The repeal of the multi-pollutant emissions standards in Section 2 lacks clarity on the motivations behind it, along with potential environmental and economic impacts. This omission raises concerns about transparency and responsible policymaking.

  • Section 2's repeal of emissions standards could create a regulatory gap by not providing alternative measures, which might lead to increased pollution and undermine environmental protection efforts.

  • The lack of stakeholder input or feedback in the decision to repeal emissions standards in Section 2 could indicate a disregard for inclusive and balanced policy development.

  • In Section 3, the vagueness of terms such as 'specific technology' and 'limited availability of new motor vehicles' introduces ambiguity, possibly leading to enforcement challenges and legal disputes.

  • The 24-month timeframe in Section 3 for the necessary regulatory revisions might delay urgent adjustments required to adapt to changing environmental or technological circumstances, potentially impacting the effectiveness of regulations.

  • Section 3 does not account for any exemptions or considerations where specific technologies might be essential to meet environmental or safety standards, potentially conflicting with other regulatory objectives.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act specifies that the law can be referred to as the "Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act of 2025."

2. Repeal of multi-pollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the rule made by the Environmental Protection Agency about emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles for model years 2027 and later will no longer be effective.

3. Ensuring tailpipe regulations do not limit the availability of new motor vehicles Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Clean Air Act to ensure that new regulations on vehicle emissions do not require the use of specific technologies or restrict the availability of new cars based on their engine types. It also mandates the EPA to update existing regulations within two years to align with these changes.