Overview
Title
To amend the Small Business Act to eliminate certain requirements relating to the award of construction subcontracts within the county or State of performance.
ELI5 AI
S. 991 is a bill that wants to let people who give out small building jobs choose workers from anywhere, not just from the local area. This change could mean more people can do the job, as long as they are good at it, no matter where they live.
Summary AI
S. 991 seeks to change the Small Business Act by removing specific rules about awarding construction subcontracts only within the county or state where the work is being done. This means that there will no longer be a requirement for these subcontract awards to stay within the local area, potentially allowing for a broader range of subcontractors to be considered regardless of their location. The bill was introduced by Mr. Sullivan, along with Ms. Murkowski and Ms. Hirono, and it has been assigned to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship for further discussion.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The legislative proposal known as S. 991 aims to amend the Small Business Act by eliminating specific requirements related to construction subcontracts. Currently, there is a provision in the law that mandates construction subcontracts to be awarded within the county or State where the construction work is to be performed. This bill seeks to repeal Paragraph (11) of Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, thereby removing this geographic restriction.
Significant Issues
An important issue with the bill is the lack of detail on how the repeal will influence existing and future construction subcontracts. By not providing this information, the bill may create uncertainties for businesses that rely on clear regulatory frameworks. Additionally, there is no context or rationale provided for the repeal, making it difficult to assess who stands to benefit or lose from this change. Without these explanations, the bill could lead to legal ambiguities and differing interpretations of its intent and impact.
Impact on the Public
By lifting the requirement that construction subcontracts be awarded within the specific county or State of performance, the bill could potentially increase competition by allowing contractors from outside the local area to bid on projects. For the broader public, this could mean a more competitive market that might lead to cost efficiencies and potentially lower construction costs. However, it also could result in fewer opportunities for local businesses and workers, possibly affecting local economies.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local contractors and small businesses that have traditionally benefited from the existing geographic requirements may experience a negative impact. These businesses often rely on the advantages of local subcontracting opportunities to sustain their operations. The removal of these requirements could increase competition from non-local firms, which might pose challenges for smaller local firms with fewer resources.
On the positive side, this bill might benefit larger or more resourceful construction companies that can operate across broader geographic areas. These companies could find new opportunities in areas previously closed to them due to the geographic restrictions. Additionally, expanding the potential pool of subcontractors could lead to more innovative and efficient outcomes, benefitting projects with enhanced quality and varied expertise.
Overall, the bill stands to reshape how construction subcontracts are awarded, with implications that stretch beyond mere geographic considerations to economic and competitive dynamics within the construction industry.
Issues
The repealing of Paragraph (11) of section 8(a) of the Small Business Act is not accompanied by any specific details on how this will affect current and future construction subcontracts, raising concerns about the potential for unforeseen consequences and legal ambiguities. (Section 1)
The bill lacks context or justification for repealing the requirement, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the change may disproportionately benefit certain organizations or individuals, potentially impacting the fairness of the legislation. (Section 1)
The absence of explanatory language regarding the intended impact on small businesses and subcontracting processes could lead to misunderstandings or operational challenges, particularly for small businesses that rely on clear legislative guidance. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Elimination of requirement relating to award of construction subcontracts within county or State of performance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that a specific requirement in the Small Business Act, which relates to awarding construction subcontracts within the same county or state where the work is done, is being removed or canceled.