Overview

Title

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to La Paz County, Arizona, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to let a park ranger sell some land in Arizona to the people who live there so they can use it. They have to pay for all the work to check the land and make sure there aren't any important old things or animals that would get hurt.

Summary AI

S. 909 proposes that the Secretary of the Interior transfers about 3,400 acres of federal land in Arizona to La Paz County. The land will be sold to the county at its appraised market value, and the county must cover all related costs, including appraisals and surveys. The bill ensures protection for Tribal cultural artifacts and allows for minor errors on the land map to be corrected. Proceeds from the land sale will go to a federal account to support future land transactions.

Published

2025-03-10
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-10
Package ID: BILLS-119s909is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
934
Pages:
5
Sentences:
22

Language

Nouns: 292
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 46
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 41
Entities: 84

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.06
Average Sentence Length:
42.45
Token Entropy:
4.82
Readability (ARI):
22.22

AnalysisAI

Commentary on S. 909: La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act

General Summary

The bill introduced as S. 909, titled the "La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act," proposes that the Secretary of the Interior shall convey certain federal lands to La Paz County, Arizona. This land transfer amounts to approximately 3,400 acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management with the intention of stimulating solar energy projects and job creation in the region. The bill outlines procedures and requirements for land appraisals, conveyance terms, and cultural artifact protection.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the provisions of this bill. First, the bill allows for the determination of areas with significant cultural, environmental, or wildlife resources to be made at the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, without explicit criteria. This lack of specificity raises concerns over potential subjectivity and inconsistency in protecting valuable sites.

Additionally, the requirement for La Paz County to pay fair market value for the land lacks clarity on monitoring and validation processes, presenting opportunities for inefficient or unfair transactions. The provisions for protecting tribal artifacts are also vague, relying on "good faith efforts" without specific compliance or enforcement mechanisms in place.

Another issue is the undefined term "minor boundary adjustments," which may permit more extensive land changes than intended. Furthermore, the reliance on a specific map dated June 29, 2023, without ensuring broad accessibility limits transparency for stakeholders who cannot access the map physically.

Impact on the Public

The bill's impact on the general public largely centers around the balance between promoting renewable energy and protecting cultural and environmental resources. By facilitating solar energy development, the bill has the potential to provide cleaner energy options and create jobs in La Paz County, positively contributing to the economy and the environment.

However, the potential for subjective decisions regarding land with cultural or environmental significance can lead to public backlash and opposition from conservationists and Indigenous communities. Inadequacies in transparency and dispute resolution mechanisms could further compound these concerns, leaving the public with uncertainties regarding the fair administration of the land transfer.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For La Paz County, the bill is a double-edged sword. On the positive side, acquiring federal land for solar project development promises economic benefits and employment growth, enhancing local infrastructure and community resources. However, fiscal challenges may arise from undefined costs related to surveys and appraisals, leading to budgetary constraints.

Indigenous tribes, particularly the Colorado River Indian Tribes, bear significant stakes. Although the bill recognizes the need for artifact protection, its vague language may lead to insufficient safeguarding of cultural heritage. Potential disturbances to these artifacts could strain relations between the County and Indigenous entities.

The Bureau of Land Management and the Department of the Interior face the task of implementing this bill under scrutiny. Their handling of land designations and transaction fairness must be transparent and accountable, given the discretionary powers assigned to the Secretary of the Interior.

Conclusion

Overall, while S. 909 seeks to advance renewable energy and economic growth in La Paz County, its limitations in detail and clarity raise several concerns. Stakeholders and the general public will benefit from greater transparency and specificity, ensuring that economic interests do not eclipse the protection of environmental and cultural resources. As discussions continue, balancing development with preservation should remain at the forefront of legislative and administrative efforts.

Issues

  • SEC. 3: The bill requires the determination of 'significant cultural, environmental, wildlife, or recreational resources' to be made at the Secretary's discretion without clear criteria, which may result in subjective or inconsistent decisions that affect the preservation of important sites.

  • SEC. 3: The bill mandates payment of fair market value for the land, but does not specify how this payment will be validated or monitored, potentially leading to inefficient or unfair transactions.

  • SEC. 3: There is a lack of specificity regarding the 'good faith efforts' requirement for protecting tribal artifacts, which is vague and does not include specific enforcement or compliance measures.

  • SEC. 3: The term 'minor boundary adjustments' is undefined, which could permit broader changes than intended, affecting the scope of land conveyance without adequate checks.

  • SEC. 2: The definition of 'Federal land' lacks detail on what qualifies it, leading to potential ambiguity in its execution.

  • SEC. 2: Stakeholders without access to the specific map dated June 29, 2023, may find it challenging to understand the exact regions being discussed as part of this land conveyance.

  • SEC. 3: The procedural language does not ensure accessibility for public inspection of the map, especially for those without physical access to the Bureau of Land Management offices, which could limit transparency.

  • SEC. 3: There is no specified mechanism for resolving disputes between the Secretary and the County regarding boundary adjustments or map corrections, possibly leading to prolonged disagreements.

  • SEC. 3: The costs related to surveys, appraisals, and administrative processes lack detail on calculation or auditing, potentially resulting in unanticipated expenses for the County.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states that it can be officially called the "La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act."

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section defines key terms used throughout the document. It specifies that "County" refers to La Paz County in Arizona, "Federal Land" pertains to roughly 3,400 acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and "Map" is a specific map titled "BLM Arizona—La Paz County Land Conveyance Map." Additionally, "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior.

3. Conveyance to La Paz County, Arizona Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the process for transferring federal land to La Paz County, Arizona, requiring the county to pay the fair market value and cover related costs. It also mandates measures to protect tribal artifacts, allows minor map corrections, withdraws the land from mining laws, and specifies that proceeds from the sale will go to a federal land account.