Overview

Title

To improve disaster assistance programs of the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025 is like a plan to help farmers when bad things happen, like when it doesn't rain enough or when their cows need food. It tries to make the help come faster and easier, and they also want to be super sure they are doing things the best way by looking at all the right information.

Summary AI

The Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025 aims to enhance disaster assistance programs for agriculture by improving emergency conservation programs and emergency forest restoration programs. It introduces additional requirements and streamlined application processes for agricultural producers using federal, state, or local land. The bill also amends livestock forage and honey bee disaster assistance, expands eligibility criteria, and establishes a drought monitor working group to improve data quality and consistency. Additionally, it mandates better coordination and alignment between the Farm Service Agency and the Forest Service for responding to drought conditions.

Published

2025-03-06
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-06
Package ID: BILLS-119s904is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
11
Words:
4,049
Pages:
21
Sentences:
58

Language

Nouns: 1,162
Verbs: 304
Adjectives: 138
Adverbs: 22
Numbers: 199
Entities: 295

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.06
Average Sentence Length:
69.81
Token Entropy:
5.12
Readability (ARI):
35.79

AnalysisAI

The "Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025," officially titled S. 904, is introduced in the 119th Congress to enhance disaster assistance programs managed by the Department of Agriculture. The bill seeks to address agricultural challenges during emergencies, particularly focusing on drought and livestock-related issues. It proposes modifications to existing legislation to broaden eligibility, streamline processes, and improve coordination among different agencies.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill primarily amends the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to expand the scope of emergency conservation programs, making more land types and users eligible for support and simplifying the application process in emergencies. It also renegotiates the Livestock Forage Disaster Program by allowing earlier assistance claims. Additionally, it establishes a working group to improve data for the U.S. Drought Monitor and aims to align the drought response activities of the Farm Service Agency and the Forest Service.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the proposed changes:

  1. Public Input Waiver: Section 2's allowance to bypass the public comment period during drought emergencies might reduce environmental oversight and transparency in decision-making.

  2. Broadened Assistance Criteria: Without clear guidelines, adding "drought" as an assistance factor in Section 4 could lead to uneven support distribution due to subjective assessments of need.

  3. Increased Spending Concern: In Section 3, the changed eligibility criteria for receiving assistance after only 4 weeks of disrupted grazing could strain federal budgets due to increased claims.

  4. Unclear Cost Regulations: Section 4's inclusion of transportation costs for agricultural supplies lacks clear expense guidelines, potentially ballooning project costs.

  5. Environmental and Archeological Reviews: Accepting NRCS reviews without additional scrutiny in Sections 2 and 4 might risk insufficient environmental considerations.

  6. Budget Considerations: The absence of defined budgets in Sections 5 and the overall bill could lead to unchecked spending in the initiative's execution.

Potential Impacts on the Public

For the public, particularly those engaged in agriculture, the bill's provisions could mean timely assistance during emergencies, minimizing prolonged drought impacts on livestock and crop production. The guaranteed help during shorter disruptions may bolster small to medium-sized farms struggling with increasingly unpredictable weather patterns. However, the potential financial strain on federal resources and the risk of inequitable distribution could also mean that these programs might not be sustainable in the long run, impacting future assistance availability.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

Farmers and agricultural producers stand to benefit significantly from this legislation as it provides flexibility and potentially quicker financial assistance in times of need. The simplified processes could reduce wait times, and expanded eligibility could welcome a larger group of beneficiaries. However, larger beekeeping operations, with no limits set on the size eligible for honey bee assistance, might disproportionately benefit from such changes compared to smaller entities, which could potentially be marginalized.

The formation of an interagency drought monitor working group promises improved data collation, benefiting long-term planning in drought-prone areas. Yet, the lack of explicit budget constraints and evaluation mechanisms could invite inefficiencies.

Overall, while the bill aims to provide much-needed reform and support for agricultural disaster assistance, its successful implementation will hinge on refining certain aspects, detailing clear regulations, and ensuring equitable and efficient distribution of resources.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 2 allowing the waiver of the 30-day public comment period during drought emergencies may limit public input and reduce transparency, potentially leading to less oversight and accountability in environmental decision-making.

  • The amendments in Section 4 introducing 'drought' as an additional factor for emergency assistance without clear guidelines on its assessment may lead to subjectivity and inconsistency in the application of benefits, which could result in unequal support distribution.

  • The change in eligibility criteria in Section 3 for the Livestock Forage Disaster Program from requiring 'at least 8 consecutive weeks' to 'not less than 4 consecutive weeks' may significantly increase spending and requires further justification for necessity, impacting federal budgets.

  • The language in Section 2 and Section 4 allowing for the acceptance of NRCS reviews without additional scrutiny could result in insufficient consideration of environmental and archeological factors, bypassing important checks and balances.

  • The inclusion of transportation costs for feed, water, livestock, and honey bees in Section 4 without clear limits or guidance may lead to increased costs, raising concerns over potential misuse.

  • The amendments in Section 5 detailing the formation of a drought monitor interagency working group lack a specific budget or spending cap, which could lead to potentially wasteful or unchecked spending.

  • Sections 5 and 6 do not provide information on evaluation mechanisms for the effectiveness of the interagency working group and the alignment of Farm Service Agency and Forest Service drought response measures, posing challenges in ensuring accountability and effective policy implementation.

  • The amendments in Section 4 for honey bee colony loss determination, specifically excluding colony collapse disorder, require careful oversight to prevent improper implementation without clear scientific backing, setting a precedent for how agricultural data may be used in disaster assistance programs.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states its short title, which is the “Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025.”

2. Emergency conservation program improvements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill amends the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to improve emergency conservation and forest restoration programs by including more types of land and users eligible for support and simplifying application processes during drought emergencies. It also includes clerical and organizational updates to ensure clarity and consistency within the act.

402C. Additional requirements for emergency conservation program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes additional requirements for the emergency conservation program, specifying that eligible agricultural producers who use federal, state, or local land can receive payments for new and replacement permanent measures, like wells and pipelines. It also explains how, during a drought emergency, the public comment period can be waived, and various reviews can be accepted using assessments conducted by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.

402. Water conservation and water enhancing measures during severe drought Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is given the authority to implement measures focused on conserving water and enhancing water resources during times of severe drought.

403. Emergency watershed program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is given the authority to manage an emergency watershed program, which means they can respond to emergencies that affect natural watersheds.

405. Regulations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary has the authority to create regulations.

404. Cost-share requirement; maximum payment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines rules regarding the cost-sharing requirement and sets a limit on the maximum payment amount.

3. Livestock forage disaster program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment changes the criteria for farmers to receive assistance from the Livestock Forage Disaster Program, allowing them to qualify for aid if their grazing period is disrupted for at least 4 weeks instead of the previous 8 weeks, and it increases assistance to two monthly payments for disruptions lasting 8 weeks or more.

4. Emergency assistance for livestock, honey bees, and farm-raised fish Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section discusses changes to the Agricultural Act of 2014 to provide emergency assistance for livestock, honey bees, and farm-raised fish. Specifically, it includes additional causes for assistance like drought and transportation costs, sets guidelines for evaluating honey bee colony losses, and ensures that documentation requirements for honey bee producers are consistent across the country, without limiting the size of beekeeping operations.

5. Drought monitor interagency working group Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes an interagency working group led by the Secretary of Agriculture to improve data for the United States Drought Monitor. It describes the group's composition, duties, and reporting responsibilities, including submitting recommendations for policy changes, and states that the group will terminate 90 days after submitting its report.

6. Alignment of Farm Service Agency and Forest Service drought response Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Farm Service Agency and the Forest Service to create an agreement within 60 days to better coordinate their drought response efforts. The agreement will involve aligning their methods for determining drought severity, using consistent tools like the U.S. Drought Monitor, and ensuring clear communication with farmers and other stakeholders.