Overview

Title

To require certain flags of the United States to be made in the United States, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

In 2025, a new rule says that certain American flags used by the U.S. government must be made completely in the United States, using materials from the U.S. This will help make sure the flags are really all-American, but making sure everyone follows the rule might be tricky and could cost more money.

Summary AI

S. 900, titled the "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025," mandates that certain U.S. flags displayed on federal property or procured by federal agencies must be entirely manufactured in the United States. This requirement will take effect two years after the bill's enactment for displaying flags, and 90 days for procurement. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission is tasked with conducting a study on the enforcement of country-of-origin labeling for U.S. flags, with a report due one year after the bill's enactment detailing the enforcement scheme, fines, and recommendations for improvement.

Published

2025-03-06
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-06
Package ID: BILLS-119s900is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
975
Pages:
5
Sentences:
23

Language

Nouns: 296
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 44
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 30
Entities: 78

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.95
Average Sentence Length:
42.39
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
21.76

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill titled "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025" aims to ensure that certain American flags are manufactured entirely within the United States. This legislation, introduced in the 119th Congress, mandates that U.S. flags displayed on federal property or procured by federal agencies must be completely made in the United States, using materials and components that are also sourced domestically. This requirement applies to all federal entities and is meant to take effect for flag displays two years after enactment, and within 90 days for procurement. The bill also includes provisions for studying and reporting on the enforcement of country-of-origin labeling for flags.

General Summary

The central premise of the bill is straightforward: American flags used by federal agencies or displayed on federal property must be manufactured in the United States using domestic materials. Additionally, the bill mandates a study by the Federal Trade Commission to evaluate how well rules regarding the origin labeling of flags are being enforced. The results of this study will be reported to Congress, helping to strengthen these enforcement schemes if necessary.

Significant Issues

One of the key issues with the bill is the stringent requirement that all parts of a flag must be "100 percent manufactured in the United States." This could severely limit the pool of suppliers able to provide such flags, potentially increasing costs and affecting availability. The lack of exceptions or waivers in cases of supply chain disruptions or other unforeseen circumstances further complicates this issue.

The broad and sometimes ambiguous definitions within the bill, such as those for "Federal agency" and "Federal property," may lead to confusion or conflicts, particularly concerning Tribal lands. Legal clarity is paramount, and the current language of the bill may not fully address these jurisdictional and sovereignty concerns.

Additionally, while the bill respects existing international agreements, the specifics of which agreements might apply remain vague. This lack of clarity could lead to potential legal challenges if domestic obligations conflict with international ones.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the general public, especially those involved in the flag-making industry, the bill could have a significant economic impact. By insisting on a 100 percent domestic manufacturing requirement, it might bolster domestic industries and create jobs. However, this same requirement could lead to increased costs for federal procurement, which might eventually trickle down to taxpayers if such costs affect federal budgets.

Federal agencies might face procurement challenges, especially if domestic supply cannot meet demand or if costs rise significantly. This could impact not only current operations but also future financial planning and budgeting.

On the international stage, the bill's insistence on domestic manufacturing could affect trade relationships, especially if perceived as a protectionist measure that contravenes international agreements.

Conclusion

While the "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025" emphasizes national pride and economic self-sufficiency, it also faces potential challenges in implementation and international relations. The combination of stringent manufacturing requirements and potential jurisdictional confusions necessitates careful consideration and possible amendments to ensure practicality and compliance. For stakeholders, particularly federal agencies and domestic manufacturers, the bill offers both opportunities and challenges that will need to be navigated with precision. The forthcoming study on country-of-origin labeling will likely play a crucial role in assessing and refining these new regulatory measures.

Issues

  • The requirement in Section 2 that flags must be '100 percent manufactured in the United States from articles, materials, or supplies that have been 100 percent produced or manufactured in the United States' could significantly limit supplier options, potentially leading to higher procurement costs for federal agencies and impacting the availability of flags. This is of significant financial interest and may draw political attention.

  • The definition of 'made in the United States' in Section 2 could pose enforcement and verification challenges due to its stringent requirements. This may lead to compliance issues for suppliers and federal agencies, raising legal and operational concerns.

  • Section 2 does not provide any exceptions or waivers for the 100 percent domestic manufacturing requirement, which could lead to rigid enforcement that might not be practical in all situations, such as during supply chain disruptions. This rigidity could be politically and legally contentious.

  • The broad definitions of 'Federal agency' and 'Federal property' in Section 2 might cause confusion or jurisdictional disputes, especially given the inclusion of Tribal lands, which raises concerns regarding legal clarity and respect for tribal sovereignty.

  • The provision in Section 2 regarding 'international agreements' provides a broad exception but lacks specificity on what agreements are relevant. This may lead to legal challenges due to potential conflicts between domestic and international obligations.

  • Section 11 assumes adequate production capacity of United States-made flags, which may not accurately reflect reality, especially in times of increased demand. This assumption could lead to procurement challenges for federal agencies, impacting financial planning and operations.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill assigns it the name "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025," which will be used as its official short title.

2. Requirement for certain flags of United States to be made in United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed bill mandates that U.S. flags displayed on federal property or purchased by federal agencies must be entirely made in the United States, using materials that are also fully produced or manufactured within the country. This requirement will take effect for flag displays two years after the bill's enactment and for flag procurement 90 days after enactment, while ensuring compliance with international agreements and not affecting private individuals.

11. Display on Federal property; procurement by Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, Federal agencies are prohibited from displaying or buying U.S. flags on Federal property unless they are entirely made in the United States. It also clarifies that this rule does not apply to flags used by private individuals and must comply with international agreements.

3. Study on country-of-origin labeling for flags of the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission to study how well the rules for labeling where U.S. flags are made are being enforced. Within a year, they must report their findings to Congress, including any recommendations to make these rules stronger and better at stopping rule-breaking.