Overview
Title
An Act To authorize appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs, to advance the benefits of nuclear energy, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 870 is a law that gives money to help firefighters do their job better and also tries to make nuclear power safer and more advanced, but some people worry about how the money will be spent and if all the rules are clear enough.
Summary AI
S. 870 authorizes funding for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance programs, aiming to improve fire safety and response. The bill also focuses on advancing nuclear energy technology in the United States, supporting innovation, infrastructure, and workforce development. It includes measures to enhance nuclear energy generation, streamline regulatory procedures, and promote efficient licensing and oversight for new and existing nuclear facilities. Overall, the bill supports improvements in both fire safety and clean energy technology.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, identified as S. 870, primarily focuses on authorizing funding for firefighter programs and advancing nuclear energy initiatives in the United States. It aims to reauthorize financial support for the U.S. Fire Administration and related grant programs, while simultaneously pushing forward the development and deployment of advanced nuclear technologies. The bill is structured into two main divisions: one addressing firefighter assistance and safety, and the other focused on nuclear energy advancement, particularly through modernizing regulations and improving efficiency.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents notable issues across its sections:
Funding Justification and Oversight: There is a lack of detailed justification for the substantial allocation of funds, such as the $95 million annually for the U.S. Fire Administration. This raises questions about proper oversight and efficient use of public resources.
Ambiguity and Favoritism: The language used in the sections related to nuclear energy, such as the definitions surrounding advanced nuclear reactors and specific licensing terms, might lead to ambiguity. Moreover, some provisions might foster perceptions of favoritism, such as exceptions for foreign ownership tied to OECD membership or India's relationship.
Complex Interagency Processes: The bill's sections on nuclear energy involve complex interactions among multiple government entities, particularly regarding national security licenses and international nuclear operations. These processes might foster delays and inconsistencies.
Potentially Wasteful Spending: Sections of the bill lack clear financial constraints or criteria, especially in areas such as nuclear fuel development and advanced reactor prizes, which could lead to unchecked spending.
Transparency and Accountability Concerns: Provisions that lack clarity on stakeholder influence, such as those regarding non-electric applications of nuclear energy, might raise concerns about the transparency and accountability of the decision-making process.
Impact on the Public
The bill aims to improve public safety by ensuring firefighter programs are well-funded and capable of meeting current challenges. In the nuclear sector, it seeks to position the United States as a leader in clean energy while maintaining rigorous safety standards. However, the bill's ambiguity and the potential for inefficient use of funds could lead to public distrust. If the funds are not effectively managed, the purported benefits may not be fully realized, impacting long-term public safety and energy sustainability.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Firefighters and Local Departments: The bill promises substantial support for firefighter programs, which could enhance emergency response capabilities and provide valuable resources for equipment and training. However, without clear accountability, not all departments may benefit equally.
Nuclear Industry: The legislation could significantly impact stakeholders within the nuclear industry, including technology developers and regulatory bodies. By streamlining processes and offering development incentives, the bill could foster innovation and efficiency. Nonetheless, the lack of clearly defined guidelines might advantage certain entities over others, potentially leading to uneven progress within the industry.
Foreign Nuclear Enterprises: The bill’s provisions on foreign ownership exceptions might benefit certain international entities, thereby bolstering strategic partnerships with countries like India. Conversely, entities from non-OECD nations might view these provisions as exclusionary, potentially leading to competitive disparities.
In conclusion, while the bill seeks to bolster public safety and lead innovation in nuclear technology, its effectiveness will depend heavily on clarifying the ambiguous terms and ensuring rigorous oversight to prevent wasteful expenditures and perceptions of favoritism.
Financial Assessment
The legislation S. 870, titled "An Act To authorize appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs, to advance the benefits of nuclear energy, and for other purposes," includes several financial provisions and references which merit discussion.
United States Fire Administration and Firefighter Assistance Programs
The bill allocates $95,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2024 through 2028 to support the United States Fire Administration. Within this allocation, $3,420,000 each fiscal year is specifically earmarked to carry out certain provisions of the act. This allocation aims to enhance fire safety and response capabilities across the nation.
An issue arises due to a lack of detailed justification for these financial allocations, which could lead to concerns about oversight and the efficient use of resources. There is a need for clear criteria and transparency in how this funding is managed and disbursed to ensure it meets intended objectives effectively.
Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program
The bill authorizes $750,000,000 annually from 2024 through 2028 for the Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program and the Fire Prevention and Safety Grants Program. This substantial financial commitment reflects the prioritization of fire safety and the support of emergency services across the country.
Nuclear Energy Advancements
The act involves multiple aspects related to nuclear energy, including research, innovation, and operational enhancements, but there are some notable financial implications:
Advanced Nuclear Reactor Prizes: While intended to stimulate innovation and development within the nuclear sector, the issue identified pertains to the exclusion of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) funds from being considered as "Federal funds." This exclusion might complicate financial accountability and could be seen as favoritism, especially when awarding these nuclear reactor prizes.
Nuclear Energy Study: The act proposes a global nuclear energy assessment study. However, there is concern over potential complexities and lack of prioritization that could lead to an unfocused approach and inefficient use of resources, particularly if financial constraints are not clearly defined.
Foreign Ownership Exceptions: The bill permits exceptions to foreign ownership in nuclear energy based on membership in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or India's relationship, potentially raising fairness issues to non-OECD countries. This may lead to commercial or legal disputes, influencing financial investments and engagements within the nuclear energy sector.
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Development: Although the act seeks to promote development in nuclear fuel technologies, the lack of detailed criteria or specific budget allocations could lead to unchecked governmental expenditure. An apparent financial ambiguity may result in ineffective management of resources meant for advancing nuclear fuel concepts.
Miscellaneous Financial Concerns
Additional concerns include ambiguity around criteria, processes, and the scope of stakeholder influence in funding decisions, which might impact transparency and accountability in the utilization of financial resources. This highlights the necessity for well-defined guidelines and oversight mechanisms for the financial aspects of the bill to prevent potential misuse and ensure alignment with strategic goals.
Overall, while the financial allocations in S. 870 aim to support vital programs and technological advancements, there are significant concerns about how effectively these funds will be managed and what safeguards are in place to ensure they achieve their intended impact. Careful attention to oversight and clear, specific financial planning is advisable to address these issues effectively.
Issues
The allocation of $95,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2024 through 2028 for the United States Fire Administration, with $3,420,000 earmarked specifically for section 8(f), lacks detailed justification, which could lead to concerns about necessary oversight and efficient use of resources. (Section 2)
The sunset date extension from 2024 to 2030 for the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant Program might require further justification to ensure alignment with current needs and goals, raising questions about program effectiveness. (Section 4)
The use of vague language, including 'advanced nuclear reactor' and terms associated with licensing and export, might lead to favoritism or ambiguity in implementation, particularly concerning international engagements and strategic competitiveness. (Sections 1, 101, 102)
The broad authority granted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for coordinating international nuclear export and innovation activities could potentially lead to favoritism and inefficiencies if specific criteria are not outlined. (Section 101)
The exclusion of Tennessee Valley Authority funds from being considered as 'Federal funds' in awards might complicate financial accountability and raise concerns of favoritism, especially in awarding nuclear reactor prizes. (Section 202)
The potential complexities and lack of prioritization in the study on global nuclear energy assessment, which could lead to an unfocused approach and inefficient use of resources without clear financial constraints. (Section 104)
The amendment to allow foreign ownership exceptions based on OECD membership or India's relationship might raise concerns regarding fairness to non-OECD countries, potentially leading to legal or commercial disputes. (Section 301)
The process and criteria for determining license issuance involving multiple entities for national security purposes may be seen as complex, potentially leading to delays or inconsistencies in the application. (Section 102)
The potential wasteful spending highlighted by the lack of detailed criteria or specific budgets for advanced nuclear fuel development, which could lead to unchecked governmental expenditure. (Section 404)
Ambiguity surrounding criteria, processes, and the potential scope of stakeholder influence, particularly in licensing considerations for nonelectric applications, could lead to concerns about transparency and accountability. (Sections 203, 401)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official name for this part of the legislation is the "Fire Grants and Safety Act of 2023."
2. Reauthorization of the United States Fire Administration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to allocate $95,000,000 annually from 2024 to 2028 for the United States Fire Administration, with $3,420,000 each year specifically designated for section 8(f) activities.
Money References
- Section 17(g)(1) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2216(g)(1)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (L), by striking “and” after the semicolon; (2) in subparagraph (M)— (A) by striking “for for” and inserting “for”; and (B) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraraph: “(N) $95,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028, of which $3,420,000 for each such fiscal year shall be used to carry out section 8(f).”. ---
3. Reauthorization of Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program and the Fire Prevention and Safety Grants Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section extends the expiration date of certain grants under the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act from 2024 to 2030 and authorizes $750 million in funding each year from 2024 to 2028 for these programs.
Money References
- (b) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 33(q)(1) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(q)(1)) is amended by striking “to carry out this section—” and all that follows through “the fiscal year described in clause (i)” and inserting “to carry out this section $750,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028”.
4. Reauthorization of Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes changes to the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act by extending the expiration date for the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant Program from 2024 to 2030 and updating the fiscal years for which appropriations are authorized to include 2024 through 2028.
5. GAO audit and report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) must conduct an audit and publish a report within three years of the Act's passage, focusing on the challenges fire departments face in obtaining Federal funding and evaluating the United States Fire Administration.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2024" aims to support the growth of nuclear energy in the U.S. by promoting international cooperation, modernizing regulations for new technologies, preserving current nuclear facilities, improving the nuclear fuel supply chain, and enhancing the efficiency of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It includes provisions for developing advanced nuclear reactors, addressing regulatory challenges, and enhancing workforce training and management.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, key terms related to nuclear energy, such as "accident tolerant fuel," "advanced nuclear reactor," and "institution of higher education," are clearly defined, including the roles of the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Additionally, the section specifies relevant committees within Congress, as well as references legal sections where specific definitions can be found.
101. International nuclear export and innovation activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the responsibilities of the Commission in coordinating international activities related to nuclear export and innovation, including import and export licensing, and international cooperation and assistance for nuclear reactors and materials. It establishes the possibility of creating a dedicated branch within the Office of International Programs and requires that costs for these activities be excluded from the fee base, emphasizing coordination with other government departments and maintaining the Commission's regulatory authority.
102. Denial of certain domestic licenses for national security purposes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the rules for handling enriched uranium fuel made outside the U.S. by entities associated with Russia or China. It prohibits possessing or owning such fuel without a specific license, which requires consultation with the Secretaries of Energy and State to ensure it does not threaten U.S. national security.
103. Export license notification Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for notifying Congress when an export license for specific nuclear-related items is granted to certain countries. It defines "low-enriched uranium" and specifies the types of items and countries involved, particularly highlighting countries that have not adhered to certain international nuclear safety agreements.
104. Global nuclear energy assessment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Energy to work with other top officials to study the global nuclear energy industry's current status and supply chains within a year of the Act's enactment. The study should cover topics like the industry's risks, its role in foreign policy, collaboration possibilities with allied countries, and recommendations for aligning nuclear energy policies with national security, among others. A report of findings, possibly with a classified section, must be sent to Congress 180 days after the study is done.
105. Process for review and amendment of part 810 generally authorized destinations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a process where the Secretary of Energy, with input from the Secretary of State, must evaluate certain factors to decide which countries can receive nuclear-related assistance without a special agreement. The list of these countries must be reviewed within a year of the law's passage and every five years after that, with updates to the process for determining such status where necessary.
201. Fees for advanced nuclear reactor application review Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act outline the definitions and fees related to reviewing advanced nuclear reactor applications. They establish terms like "advanced nuclear reactor applicant," determine how fees are assessed, and clarify that certain costs cannot be included in the fees charged to these applicants, with some provisions expiring on September 30, 2030.
202. Advanced nuclear reactor prizes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law to introduce prizes for the first eligible entities, which include non-Federal entities and the Tennessee Valley Authority, that achieve specific licensing milestones for advanced nuclear reactors. The awards are based on different categories of advanced reactors and aim to cover the costs the entities incur for obtaining the necessary licenses, with the amount of the award also being limited by certain funding restrictions.
203. Licensing considerations relating to use of nuclear energy for nonelectric applications Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commission to report to Congress within 270 days on licensing issues for advanced nuclear reactors, particularly focusing on their flexible use for nonelectric applications like industrial heat and hydrogen production. The report will seek input from various stakeholders and must outline existing licensing challenges, propose solutions, discuss potential regulatory actions, and include cost estimates and timelines for integrating new regulatory measures.
204. Enabling preparations for the demonstration of advanced nuclear reactors on Department of Energy sites or critical national security infrastructure sites Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act to include costs for reviewing applications for early site permits to demonstrate advanced nuclear reactors on Department of Energy sites or critical national security infrastructure. These amendments will take effect on October 1, 2025.
205. Fusion energy regulation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section aims to amend existing laws to define and regulate "fusion machines," which are devices that transform atomic nuclei using fusion and capture the products for use. It requires a report on developing licensing frameworks for these machines within one year, considering safety and performance standards similar to those used in the aviation industry.
206. Regulatory issues for nuclear facilities at brownfield sites Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines plans for improving the regulatory process for nuclear facilities at sites that have shut down fossil fuel plants or are environmentally degraded, called brownfield sites. The Commission is tasked with evaluating and updating its guidelines to speed up the licensing and oversight processes for these facilities, considering using existing infrastructure, and engaging with local communities, with specific deadlines for reporting their progress to Congress.
207. Combined license review procedure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a fast-tracked process for issuing combined licenses for new nuclear reactors. It specifies qualifications for applicants, sets deadlines for the Commission to complete reviews and issue licenses, and requires reporting on delays and plans to address them if deadlines are missed.
208. Regulatory requirements for micro-reactors Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the responsibilities of the Commission in creating guidelines for licensing and regulating micro-reactors, emphasizing risk-informed and performance-based strategies covering areas like staffing, safety, and environmental impact within 18 months. It also requires the implementation of these strategies within 3 years, taking into account the unique features of micro-reactors and consulting with various stakeholders, including the Secretary of Energy and technology developers.
301. Foreign ownership Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines exceptions to the prohibitions on issuing licenses for certain nuclear facilities to foreign entities, allowing licenses if the entity is not a threat to public safety or security. It specifies eligible foreign entities, excludes certain countries under sanctions, and includes a technical amendment to correct language in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
401. Report on advanced methods of manufacturing and construction for nuclear energy projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commission to deliver a report to Congress within 180 days, detailing advanced methods in nuclear manufacturing and construction. This report will include stakeholder feedback, address unique licensing issues, explore safety and transport requirements, and estimate costs and timelines needed to update regulatory guidance for the nuclear energy sector.
402. Nuclear energy traineeship Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates a law about training programs for nuclear energy by forming a special subprogram that offers traineeships. This program will work with universities, trade schools, and other institutions to provide training for jobs in the nuclear field and meet critical needs of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
403. Biennial report on the spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste inventory in the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Secretary of Energy must provide a report to Congress every two years, starting in 2026, detailing the costs and management processes related to spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the U.S. This includes financial damages, storage, lifecycle costs, liability accounting, and actions taken by the Department of Energy to improve technology and manage nuclear waste safely.
404. Development, qualification, and licensing of advanced nuclear fuel concepts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines an initiative by the Commission to enhance coordination and preparedness for qualifying and licensing advanced nuclear fuel, including collaboration with the Department of Energy. It requires a report on the efforts, assessing the preparedness for new fuel types, and highlighting research needs and challenges, with input from various stakeholders.
501. Mission alignment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that, within one year of the Act's enactment, the Commission must update its mission statement to ensure that the regulation of nuclear energy and materials is efficient and does not unnecessarily impede their civilian use or the societal benefits they offer. Once updated, the Commission is required to report to Congress with the new mission statement and guidance for staff to effectively fulfill this mission.
502. Strengthening the NRC workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 has been updated to allow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to directly hire well-qualified individuals for certain technical positions to improve efficiency. It also enables offering hiring and performance bonuses and adjusting compensation to address hiring and retention challenges, with all these provisions expiring by 2039 unless renewed by the NRC.
Money References
- — “(1) FOR NEW EMPLOYEES.—The Chairman may pay an individual recruited and directly appointed under subsection (a) a 1-time hiring bonus in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
- — “(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), an employee or other personnel who the Chairman determines exhibited exceptional performance in a fiscal year may be paid a performance bonus in an amount not to exceed the least of— “(i) $25,000; and “(ii) the amount of the limitation that is applicable for a calendar year under section 5307(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
161B. Commission workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section empowers the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to hire and set pay for highly-qualified employees more flexibly to meet the Commission's needs efficiently, with specific limits on the number of hires, salary caps, and bonuses; it also mandates future workforce planning, reporting to Congress, and a sunset clause where the authority expires in 2034 unless extended.
Money References
- — (1) FOR NEW EMPLOYEES.—The Chairman may pay an individual recruited and directly appointed under subsection (a) a 1-time hiring bonus in an amount not to exceed $25,000. (2) FOR EXISTING EMPLOYEES.
- — (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), an employee or other personnel who the Chairman determines exhibited exceptional performance in a fiscal year may be paid a performance bonus in an amount not to exceed the least of— (i) $25,000; and (ii) the amount of the limitation that is applicable for a calendar year under section 5307(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
503. Commission corporate support funding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses the Commission's responsibilities to report on the progress of certain budgetary and operational goals under the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act. It also amends the act to limit corporate support costs to 30% from fiscal year 2025 onwards and clarifies that certain costs, such as rent in specific buildings and staffing expenses, are excluded from corporate support costs.
504. Performance metrics and milestones Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendments to the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act reduce the review period for performance metrics and milestones from 180 to 90 days and mandate that the Commission reassess these metrics and schedules every three years, making adjustments as necessary to ensure they are as efficient as possible.
505. Nuclear licensing efficiency Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section improves the process for nuclear reactor licensing by establishing efficient review guidelines, requiring periodic updates, and making use of prior information for site permits. It aims to ensure nuclear safety while expediting reviews and decisions related to licenses, permits, and applications.
506. Modernization of nuclear reactor environmental reviews Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commission to report to Congress on how it will improve the environmental review process for nuclear reactor license applications. It suggests using existing federal assessments, working with other agencies, and adopting new technologies to make the process faster and more predictable.
507. Improving oversight and inspection programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the requirement for the Commission to create a report identifying ways to improve nuclear oversight and inspection programs by using new technologies, better planning, and training. The report should seek input from various stakeholders, evaluate the effectiveness of current practices, suggest improvements, and propose specific actions for implementing those improvements without compromising safety.
601. Technical correction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to limit licenses for research facilities so that most of their operation costs cannot be from sales unrelated to research, ensuring not more than 75% comes from non-research activities and not more than 50% from energy sales. Additionally, it reorganizes clauses for clarity about regulation and research activities.
602. Report on engagement with the Government of Canada with respect to nuclear waste issues in the Great Lakes Basin Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commission to deliver a report to several Congressional committees within one year, detailing its interactions with the Canadian government concerning nuclear waste issues in the Great Lakes Basin.
603. Savings clause Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The savings clause in Section 603 states that the Act does not change or limit the powers and responsibilities that the Department of State already has.