Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income interest received on certain loans secured by rural or agricultural real property.
ELI5 AI
The Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act of 2025 wants to make it so that banks and other lenders don't have to pay taxes on the interest they earn from loans on farms or rural land. This way, they might give better loans to farmers and people in the countryside, but there are some concerns that it might mostly help bigger banks.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act of 2025 (ACRE Act of 2025), proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from taxable income the interest earned by certain lenders on loans secured by rural or agricultural real estate. It specifies that qualified lenders include banks, savings associations, state- or federally-regulated insurance companies, and certain government entities. The loans must be secured by rural or agricultural real estate, forestland, or fishing and aquaculture facilities, and cannot involve foreign adversary entities. The bill also mandates a report to be submitted to Congress assessing the impact of this measure on interest rates, five years after its enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act of 2025," known as the "ACRE Act of 2025," sets out to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary purpose of this bill is to exclude from taxable income any interest earned on loans that are secured by rural or agricultural real property, provided certain criteria are met. This initiative aims to encourage lending to rural or agricultural areas, potentially lowering the cost of borrowing in these sectors. The bill was introduced in the United States Senate and is currently under review by the Committee on Finance.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill introduces several significant issues that warrant close consideration:
Market Imbalances: The exclusion of interest earned on certain loans from taxable income may inadvertently benefit large financial institutions such as banks and insurance companies. This could create an uneven playing field where smaller lenders find it difficult to compete, potentially leading to market imbalances.
Broad Definitions: The definitions within the bill, particularly for "qualified lender" and "foreign adversary entity," are broad and could be subject to varying interpretations. This vagueness may permit exploitation by large financial entities and lead to compliance difficulties.
Loan Term Manipulations: The provision allowing refinancing loans to be excluded from the bill's stipulations could enable financial institutions to extend loan terms indefinitely. This potential loophole could undermine the bill's intent to create new financial opportunities for rural and agricultural sectors.
Ambiguities and Complexities: The bill's language ties the status of the property as rural or agricultural to the interest accrual period, introducing ambiguity that may complicate tax compliance. Furthermore, the lack of specific criteria for terms like "substantial use" adds to this complexity.
Impact Assessment and Reporting: The bill requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report on the bill's impact on loan interest rates within five years. However, it lacks specific criteria or guidelines for evaluating this impact, which may complicate thorough assessments.
Impact on the Public
The bill aims to enhance access to credit in rural and agricultural areas, potentially reducing borrowing costs and stimulating economic activity in these sectors. By excluding certain interest from taxable income, it hopes to encourage financial institutions to provide more favorable loan terms, thus fostering growth in rural communities.
However, if significant issues, such as those concerning market imbalances and broad definitions, are not addressed, the bill could disproportionately benefit larger financial entities. This might limit the effectiveness of the bill's benefits trickling down to smaller, community-based lenders and rural borrowers.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts: - Farmers and Rural Property Owners: These groups may gain easier access to credit under better terms, supporting their agricultural and business activities. - Large Financial Institutions: Banks and insurance companies could benefit significantly, gaining an ideal tax-exempt investment vehicle for targeting rural and agricultural lending.
Negative Impacts: - Small Lenders: Smaller financial institutions may find it challenging to compete if large entities dominate the market due to the tax exemptions provided. This could lead to reduced competition and fewer choices for borrowers. - Regulatory Oversight: The lack of clarity and specific criteria could lead to increased compliance burdens and administrative complexities for the financial sector, potentially raising operational costs.
Overall, while the bill aims to incentivize lending in rural and agricultural sectors, its potential to inadvertently favor large financial players and its complexities may limit its effectiveness. As such, careful consideration and possible revision of certain provisions may be necessary to ensure the bill achieves its intended outcomes.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, labeled the Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act of 2025 (ACRE Act of 2025), deals with adjustments to the tax code that affect financial references primarily through the exclusion of interest on certain loans from taxable income. This commentary below addresses the financial aspects and their connection to the identified issues.
Financial Exclusion from Taxable Income
At the core of the bill is the exclusion of interest that qualified lenders earn on certain loans secured by rural or agricultural real estate from being considered taxable income. The bill outlines specific criteria for both the loans and the lenders that would qualify for this tax benefit. This financial relief aims to encourage lending in rural and agricultural sectors by reducing the tax burden on interest income for lenders, which could potentially result in lower interest rates for borrowers.
Qualified Lenders and Market Implications
The bill defines "qualified lenders" to include entities such as banks, savings associations, insurance companies, and other specified financial entities. This gives rise to concerns about a potential market imbalance. Larger financial institutions, which can more easily meet these qualifications and may have more resources to capitalize on the exclusion, could become more dominant, thereby disadvantaging smaller lenders. This concern aligns with the issue about favoring large financial institutions and creating an imbalance in the lending market.
Refinancing Loophole and Legislative Intent
The bill specifies that the exclusion applies only to loans made after the enactment of the bill, with an exception for refinancing existing loans. This is intended to ensure that new capital finance is encouraged, but there is a risk that the provision could be used to indefinitely continue past arrangements under evolving terms. This could potentially undermine the legislative intent by permitting lenders to exploit a refinancing loop without generating new lending capital in rural sectors, which is a critical point raised in the issues.
Ambiguities and Compliance Challenges
The bill introduces ambiguity regarding the rural or agricultural status of properties at the time of interest accrual. Such complexity may lead to compliance difficulties and increased administrative costs for lenders. These expenses could counteract any financial benefits derived from the exclusion itself, and potentially affect the interest rates that this legislation aims to reduce.
Criteria for Assessing Impact
Though the bill mandates a report to Congress assessing its financial impact five years post-enactment, it lacks specific criteria for evaluation. Without clear guidelines to measure success, understanding whether the bill truly reduces interest rates on eligible loans could be challenging. This contributes to the complexity of assessing legislative effectiveness and highlights an area where the bill's financial provisions are not fully developed.
In sum, while the ACRE Act of 2025 proposes tax exclusion as a financial incentive to bolster lending in rural areas, it simultaneously introduces concerns about market dynamics, legal compliance, and effective impact assessment. These issues warrant careful consideration to ensure that this financial strategy meets the legislative objectives effectively and equitably.
Issues
The exclusion of interest on loans secured by rural or agricultural real property in Section 2 might favor large financial institutions such as banks and insurance companies, leading to a potential imbalance in the market where smaller lenders could be disadvantaged.
The definition of 'qualified lender' in Section 139J(b) is broad and could include indirectly owned entities by bank or insurance holding companies, which might lead to potential exploitation or manipulation by large financial entities.
The lack of clear criteria or guidelines for determining a 'foreign adversary entity' in Section 139J(c)(1)(B) could lead to compliance difficulties and potential legal challenges, particularly if geopolitical climates change rapidly.
The language linking the rural or agricultural status of property to the interest accrual time in Section 139J(c)(1) is ambiguous, possibly complicating tax compliance and creating legal uncertainties.
The exemption for refinancing loans described in Section 139J(c)(2) could allow for perpetuating existing loan terms indefinitely, potentially undermining the bill's legislative intent and financial oversight.
There are no specific criteria or guidelines for evaluating the amendments' effectiveness in reducing loan interest rates, as mentioned in the report to Congress requirement in Section 2(c), complicating impact assessment.
Section 139J(c)(3)'s omission of specific criteria for 'substantial use' in defining 'rural or agricultural real estate' might create ambiguity and legal challenges in interpretation.
The bill might contribute to increased tax code complexity because of detailed eligibility requirements, making compliance more burdensome for financial institutions and potentially increasing administrative costs.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states its short title, which is the "Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act of 2025," or simply the "ACRE Act of 2025."
2. Exclusion of interest on loans secured by rural or agricultural real property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress is proposing a new tax rule that would exclude from taxable income the interest earned by certain lenders on loans secured by rural or agricultural property in the U.S. This rule aims to cover loans with specific conditions, such as excluding loans to foreign adversaries, and applies to loans made after the law is enacted. Within five years, the Treasury is expected to report the rule's impact on loan interest rates to Congress.
Money References
- â(c) Qualified real estate loan.âFor purposes of this sectionâ â(1) IN GENERAL.âThe term âqualified real estate loanâ means any loanâ â(A) secured byâ â(i) rural or agricultural real estate or forestland, or â(ii) a leasehold mortgage (with a status as a lien) on rural or agricultural real estate, â(B) which is made to a person other than a foreign adversary entity, â(C) in the case of any loan with respect to single family residence described in paragraph (3)(B)â â(i) the proceeds of which are used to purchase or improve such residence, and â(ii) the principal of which (when added to the principal of all other such loans with respect to such residence) does not (as of the time the interest income on such loan is accrued) exceed $750,000, and â(D) made after the date of the enactment of this section.
139J. Interest on loans secured by rural or agricultural real property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Interest earned by qualified lenders on loans secured by rural or agricultural real estate is not considered taxable income, provided the loans meet specific criteria, such as not involving foreign adversaries and being made after the section's enactment. A "qualified lender" includes certain banks and insurance companies, while "qualified real estate loans" cover loans secured by properties like farmland, fishing businesses, or aquaculture facilities.
Money References
- ifâ (A) such entity is organized, incorporated, or established under the laws of the United States or any State of the United States, and (B) the principal place of business of such entity is in the United States (including any territory of the United States), (4) any entity wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by a company that is considered an insurance holding company under the laws of any State if such entity satisfies the requirements described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (3), and (5) with respect to interest received on a qualified real estate loan secured by real estate described in subsection (c)(3)(A), any federally chartered instrumentality of the United States established under section 8.1(a) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2279aaâ1(a)). (c) Qualified real estate loan.âFor purposes of this sectionâ (1) IN GENERAL.âThe term âqualified real estate loanâ means any loanâ (A) secured byâ (i) rural or agricultural real estate or forestland, or (ii) a leasehold mortgage (with a status as a lien) on rural or agricultural real estate, (B) which is made to a person other than a foreign adversary entity, (C) in the case of any loan with respect to single family residence described in paragraph (3)(B)â (i) the proceeds of which are used to purchase or improve such residence, and (ii) the principal of which (when added to the principal of all other such loans with respect to such residence) does not (as of the time the interest income on such loan is accrued) exceed $750,000, and (D) made after the date of the enactment of this section.