Overview
Title
To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to provide families year-round access to nutrition incentives under the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The SHOPP Act of 2025 is a plan to help families get more healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and beans all year round by giving them special coupons they can use to buy these foods. It wants to make sure families can choose from both fresh and frozen options.
Summary AI
S. 813, titled the “Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025” or the “SHOPP Act of 2025,” aims to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. The bill's primary goal is to ensure families have year-round access to nutrition incentives under the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program. It seeks to expand the types of produce included in the program to cover fresh or fresh frozen fruits, vegetables, and legumes, enhancing the availability of healthy food options. Introduced by Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Luján, and Mr. Tuberville, this bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025" or "SHOPP Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. The primary focus of this amendment is the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program. The bill aims to provide families with year-round access to nutrition incentives, specifically by broadening the program to include fresh frozen fruits and vegetables. Additionally, it expands the scope of eligible foods to encompass legumes alongside traditional fresh produce.
Summary of Significant Issues
One noteworthy issue with the bill is its potential market impact. By extending nutrition incentives to include fresh frozen fruits and vegetables, there might be an unintended favoritism towards suppliers who deal in frozen produce. This decision could hinder local fresh produce markets, which might not have the same competitive advantages as larger frozen food suppliers. Another concern is that the inclusion of legumes in the program might alter the distribution of benefits among different agricultural sectors, possibly skewing the advantages towards producers and suppliers specializing in these products.
Moreover, the expansion of the program's scope raises questions about government spending. The bill does not specify how these changes will be funded, creating uncertainty about the program's financial implications. Without an accompanying analysis of costs or funding sources, there could be ambiguity regarding the allocation of federal funds for these initiatives.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could increase access to a wider variety of nutritional options for families, potentially improving overall public health outcomes. By allowing incentives for frozen fruits and vegetables, the program could offer more affordable and convenient options, which may be particularly beneficial for low-income households or those living in food deserts with limited access to fresh produce. This change promises year-round availability and may help families diversify their diets without the constraint of seasonal produce availability.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For producers and suppliers, the bill introduces mixed prospects. Suppliers of frozen produce and legumes might experience increased demand because they become eligible for nutrition incentives. This development could positively impact these sectors, boosting production and potential revenue. However, local fresh produce sellers may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage if their products are less accessible to incentives, potentially affecting their market share and financial stability.
Policymakers and budget analysts could face challenges due to the lack of detailed financial planning accompanying the bill. This uncertainty might lead to budget reallocations or the need for additional resources, which could impact other agricultural or nutritional programs. Overall, while the act aims to foster healthier eating habits, thoughtful consideration of market dynamics and financial planning will be integral to the successful implementation of these provisions.
Issues
The bill amends the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to include 'fresh frozen fruits or vegetables' as eligible for nutrition incentives, which may favor certain suppliers over others and affect local fresh produce markets (SEC. 2).
Expanding the eligible items for incentives from 'fresh fruits and vegetables' to include 'fresh frozen fruits, vegetables, and legumes' could lead to an increase in government spending without accompanying analysis provided in the bill text about financial implications (SEC. 2).
The bill does not provide specific funding sources or financial projections related to the increased scope of nutrition incentives, creating a potential ambiguity in the allocation of federal funds (SEC. 2).
The change in definition to include 'legumes' alongside 'fruits and vegetables' as qualifying goods for incentives could shift program benefits towards suppliers of these products, raising questions about fair competition and the program's focus (SEC. 2).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially named the “Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025” or the “SHOPP Act of 2025.”
2. Nutrition incentives under Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill modifies the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program to include fresh frozen fruits and vegetables as part of its nutrition incentives and expands the eligible foods to encompass legumes.