Overview
Title
To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 81 is a rule that makes sure government papers explaining rules are clear that they are just for help and don’t change the law. This helps people know these papers are just trying to make things easier to understand!
Summary AI
S. 81, titled the “Guidance Clarity Act of 2025,” requires that all federal agencies include a clarity statement on certain types of guidance they issue. This statement must be prominently displayed and explain that the document does not carry the force of law and is meant only to clarify existing requirements or policies. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) must issue further guidance to implement this Act within 90 days of its enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Guidance Clarity Act of 2025," aims to bring transparency to guidance documents issued by U.S. government agencies. It requires that these documents include a "guidance clarity statement" that asserts they are not legally binding. The goal is to help the public understand that these guidance documents are not laws but are meant to clarify existing legal requirements or agency policies. Furthermore, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is tasked with issuing guidance to ensure the law's implementation within 90 days of its enactment.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the requirements of this bill. First, while the intention is to promote clarity, the obligation to add a guidance clarity statement to every agency document might create an administrative burden without clear benefits, especially if agencies have to allocate additional resources for compliance. Second, the phrase "do not have the force and effect of law" could confuse the public about the actual legal standing of these documents and their compliance responsibilities. Lastly, the 90-day window for the OMB to issue implementation guidance may be insufficient, possibly leading to rushed or poorly considered directives.
Public Impact
Broadly speaking, this bill seeks to improve public understanding of agency guidance documents. By clearly stating that these documents are not legally binding, the public might gain a clearer perspective of what is obligatory by law versus what is suggested or advised by a government agency. This could help individuals and businesses avoid misinterpretations that might erroneously lead them to believe certain actions are legally required.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For government agencies, the bill introduces the challenge of adding standardized clarity statements to their guidance documents, which might strain resources and disrupt operations. This could divert time and effort from more critical activities if additional administrative processes are necessary to comply with the new requirements. Additionally, businesses and legal entities that rely on agency guidance to navigate complex regulatory environments may find these documents less authoritative, potentially necessitating further legal consultation to ensure compliance.
The OMB, as a critical stakeholder in the implementation process, faces a tight timeline to issue effective guidance. This short timeframe might lead to insufficiently vetted instructions that do not consider the diverse needs and capacities of different agencies.
Overall, while the "Guidance Clarity Act of 2025" aims to enhance transparency and understanding for the public, it poses potential challenges and operational adjustments for government agencies and stakeholders that rely on these documents for regulatory compliance.
Issues
The requirement for a 'guidance clarity statement' in Section 2 might create additional administrative burden on agencies without clear benefits, affecting operational efficiency and resource allocation.
The language 'do not have the force and effect of law' in Section 2 could lead to potential confusion among the public regarding the legal status of these guidance documents, potentially causing misunderstandings about compliance requirements.
The necessity for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to issue guidance within 90 days in Section 2 may not provide adequate time for consultation or consideration of potential impacts across different agencies, which could result in poorly formulated or rushed guidance.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the document establishes the short title of the act, which is “Guidance Clarity Act of 2025”.
2. Guidance clarity statement required Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each U.S. agency must add a "guidance clarity statement" at the start of any guidance documents they issue, saying that these documents are not legal rules but are meant to help the public understand existing laws. The Office of Management and Budget will provide further guidance on how to implement this requirement within 90 days of the law being enacted.