Overview

Title

To prohibit the importation of certain minerals from the Russian Federation.

ELI5 AI

The Stop Russian Market Manipulation Act is a rule that says the United States can't buy certain metals like platinum, nickel, and copper from Russia, starting 90 days after the rule becomes official, until Russia stops being mean to Ukraine. If Russia stops being mean, the rule can end, but if they start again, the rule might come back.

Summary AI

The Stop Russian Market Manipulation Act aims to ban the importation of certain minerals from Russia to the United States starting 90 days after its enactment. The minerals affected include platinum, nickel, and copper, among others, and the ban applies if these minerals are produced in Russia or obtained in ways designed to bypass this prohibition. The act will end one year after the President certifies that Russia has ceased hostilities against Ukraine, but could be reinstated if hostilities resume within a specified period. The President is prohibited from waiving this ban under any circumstances.

Published

2025-02-27
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-27
Package ID: BILLS-119s808is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
590
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 160
Verbs: 49
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 21
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.11
Average Sentence Length:
39.33
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
20.83

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled the "Stop Russian Market Manipulation Act," aims to prohibit the importation of specific minerals from the Russian Federation into the United States. Introduced on February 27, 2025, the bill targets minerals such as platinum, nickel, and copper, with the prohibition taking effect 90 days after enactment. The ban will remain until one year after the President certifies that Russia has halted hostilities against Ukraine, with provisions for reinstatement if hostilities resume.

Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns with this legislation is its lack of specified penalties or enforcement mechanisms for violators of the import ban. This absence can result in non-compliance or varied interpretations of how the law should be enforced, weakening its intended impact. Additionally, the requirement for Presidential certification for both the cessation and potential resumption of the ban introduces subjectivity. Without clear guidelines or evidence criteria, this could lead to delays and disputes in the enforcement process. The use of subjective terms like "evade or circumvent" further complicates implementation, potentially allowing for loopholes. Lastly, the bill lacks a detailed explanation of its objectives or scope beyond its title, which might hinder public understanding.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, this bill could influence both the economy and international relations of the United States. By restricting minerals from Russia, which is a significant producer of these resources, there might be short-term market fluctuations and potential price increases for these commodities. This could affect industries reliant on these minerals, possibly leading to increased costs for goods that use them extensively.

Impact on Stakeholders

For industries in the United States that depend heavily on the specified minerals, such as the automotive and electronics sectors, the bill could pose a challenge by disrupting supply chains and increasing material costs. These industries might seek alternative sources, possibly leading to increased domestic production or imports from other countries.

Conversely, the bill might benefit domestic producers of these minerals by reducing competition from Russian imports. Politically, the bill aligns with a stance against Russian actions in Ukraine, reinforcing diplomatic pressures on Russia. However, this alignment might result in retaliatory measures from Russia affecting other trade relations or international cooperation.

Overall, while the bill attempts to apply economic pressure on Russia in response to its actions against Ukraine, the lack of clear enforcement tools and subjectivity in certain conditions may limit its effectiveness and lead to unintended economic consequences. Stakeholders, including policymakers, businesses, and the general public, must weigh these potential impacts carefully.

Issues

  • The prohibition on the importation of certain minerals from the Russian Federation under Section 2 lacks specified penalties or enforcement mechanisms for violations, which could lead to non-compliance or varied interpretations of how the law should be enforced, potentially undermining its effectiveness.

  • Section 2 introduces a termination condition based on the President's certification of the end or resumption of hostilities by the Russian Federation against Ukraine. This requirement for subjective evaluation could lead to challenges in monitoring compliance and potential delays or disputes regarding the certification process.

  • The phrase 'evade or circumvent' in Section 2(a)(2) is subjective and could result in varying interpretations, potentially creating enforcement challenges and legal loopholes.

  • The short title provided in Section 1 does not offer detailed information about the objectives or scope of the Act beyond its name, making it difficult for stakeholders to understand its implications without further context.

  • There is no clear guidance in Section 2 on the evidence or process required for the President to certify the end or resumption of hostilities, creating potential gaps in the execution and enforcement of this provision.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act provides its official name: the “Stop Russian Market Manipulation Act.”

2. Prohibition on importation of certain minerals from the Russian Federation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section prohibits the importation of certain minerals such as platinum, nickel, and copper from Russia into the United States, beginning 90 days after the bill's enactment. This prohibition will be lifted one year after the U.S. President certifies that Russia has stopped hostilities against Ukraine, but can be reinstated if hostilities resume; there are no exceptions allowed for this ban.