Overview
Title
To require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to estimate the value of electromagnetic spectrum assigned or otherwise allocated to Federal entities.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants a special group to figure out how much the radio waves, used by the government, could be worth if sold to people or businesses. They have to look at this regularly and let important people know, but they need to keep some secret stuff private.
Summary AI
S. 792 is a bill that mandates the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to estimate the value of electromagnetic spectrum allocated to federal entities. The spectrum, ranging from 3 kilohertz to 95 gigahertz, must be assessed for its potential commercial use value, and the NTIA must repeat these estimates at scheduled intervals. The bill also requires federal agencies to report the estimated value of their spectrum holdings in their budgets and financial statements. The NTIA must disclose the valuation process publicly, except for certain sensitive information, which can only be shared with Congress under specific conditions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, known as the "Government Spectrum Valuation Act," aims to address the valuation of electromagnetic spectrum allocated to federal entities. The bill mandates the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to estimate the value of electromagnetic spectrum within certain frequency ranges. These estimates are to be conducted regularly and reported in federal entities' budgets and financial statements. The primary objective is to create a systematic approach for understanding and valuing the spectrum, which is a critical resource for both government and commercial operations.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several significant issues that warrant attention. Firstly, there is ambiguity in the language used, particularly in addressing dynamic scoring and the determination of the "highest potential value." This lack of precision could result in subjective valuations and inconsistent applications, potentially affecting the fairness of the valuation process.
Another area of concern is the exemption of certain information from public disclosure. While there are provisions to withhold classified, law enforcement-sensitive, or proprietary information, this could reduce transparency and accountability. This lack of openness might impede public and stakeholder scrutiny of the processes involved.
Additionally, the bill requires federal entities to report the estimated spectrum value in their budgets and financial statements. However, it does not address how changes in spectrum valuation could impact long-term budget planning. This oversight could lead to financial mismanagement if spectrum values fluctuate significantly.
Impact on the Public
The impact of the bill on the general public is multifaceted. By increasing transparency in the valuation of electromagnetic spectrum, this legislation could improve the management and optimization of a valuable public resource. A systematic and periodic evaluation of spectrum value may lead to more efficient and effective use of these frequencies, potentially benefiting both government and commercial services that rely on wireless communications.
However, the lack of clarity and specificity in certain sections of the bill may hinder its implementation. Unclear guidelines for valuing spectrum and protecting sensitive information may lead to public distrust and skepticism about whether spectrum management processes are equitable and transparent.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The enactment of this bill could have a mixed impact on specific stakeholders. For federal entities, the bill imposes new reporting requirements, which may demand additional resources and administrative efforts to comply effectively. If valuations significantly influence federal budgets, there may be ripple effects on agency operations and financial planning.
For commercial stakeholders, the bill's focus on spectrum valuation based on the "highest potential value" of commercial services might open opportunities for improved access to spectrum resources. Yet, uncertainties in the valuation process could introduce unpredictability in planning spectrum-dependent services, potentially affecting investment and innovation in this sector.
In conclusion, while the "Government Spectrum Valuation Act" aims to make constructive changes to how electromagnetic spectrum is valued and reported, certain ambiguities and exemptions in the bill could challenge its effectiveness. Addressing these concerns by providing clearer guidelines and ensuring transparency will be crucial in maximizing the positive impacts of the legislation.
Issues
The section titled 'Estimate of value of electromagnetic spectrum' (Section 2) lacks clear and precise language. The vague use of terms such as 'to the greatest extent practicable' regarding dynamic scoring and 'highest potential value' could lead to inconsistent applications and subjective valuations, impacting the fairness and transparency of spectrum valuation processes.
Section 2.105(d)(4) addresses the disclosure of information used in spectrum valuation. The exemption for classified, law enforcement-sensitive, or proprietary information from public disclosure could reduce transparency and accountability, making it difficult for the public and stakeholders to scrutinize the processes and decisions.
In Section 1, titled 'Short title', there is insufficient detail about the purpose or scope of the 'Government Spectrum Valuation Act.' This lack of specificity makes it harder to understand the overall objectives of the bill and how they might affect federal and commercial interests.
Section 2.105(d)(2) highlights a potential conflict of interest by needing to balance government capabilities with commercial interests. The language does not clearly address how these potentially conflicting requirements will be managed, which could lead to biased spectrum allocation favoring certain interests.
Section 2.105(e) requires Federal entities to report the estimated value of the spectrum in their budgets and financial statements, yet it does not explore how such valuation changes could impact long-term budget planning, potentially leading to financial mismanagement if spectrum values fluctuate significantly.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of this legislation is the "Government Spectrum Valuation Act".
2. Estimate of value of electromagnetic spectrum Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is required to estimate the value of electromagnetic spectrum in specific frequency ranges for federal entities. These estimates consider the potential commercial value and must be conducted on a schedule—every three years for different frequency bands. The NTIA must disclose how these estimates are calculated unless the information is sensitive or classified, while federal entities must report the estimated values in their budgets and financial statements.
105. Estimate of value of electromagnetic spectrum Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to estimate the value of the electromagnetic spectrum in certain frequency bands, which are assigned to Federal entities. These estimates must consider how valuable the spectrum would be if used for the highest value commercial services and must be updated periodically, with public disclosure unless the information is classified or sensitive.