Overview

Title

To provide for the standardization, publication, and accessibility of data relating to public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act is a plan to make it easier for everyone to see and understand maps and information about where people can play and fish on U.S. rivers and oceans. It wants to make sure this information is organized and shared online so that people can find it easily.

Summary AI

S. 759, titled the “Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act,” aims to improve the way data about public recreational use of U.S. Federal waterways and fishing restriction areas is standardized and shared. It requires the Secretary of Commerce to create and update a website with geospatial data about these areas, making the information easily accessible and regularly updated. The bill also emphasizes collaboration with various stakeholders, including state agencies and expert groups, to ensure data interoperability and compliance with federal, state, and tribal regulations.

Published

2025-02-26
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-26
Package ID: BILLS-119s759is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
1,499
Pages:
8
Sentences:
29

Language

Nouns: 464
Verbs: 89
Adjectives: 103
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 42
Entities: 71

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.31
Average Sentence Length:
51.69
Token Entropy:
4.98
Readability (ARI):
27.94

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, titled the "Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act," aims to enhance the way data about public outdoor recreational use of federal waterways is managed and shared. Introduced in the Senate, this legislation intends to establish standardized procedures for collecting, publishing, and ensuring the accessibility of geospatial data related to these waterways and areas with specific fishing restrictions.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill mandates the Secretary of Commerce to develop standards for the collection and dissemination of data related to federal waterways and fishing restrictions. This includes making such data accessible through a publicly available website. It outlines specific types of information to be shared, like conditions under which waterways are accessible and the types of watercraft that may be used. The bill also encourages collaboration with a variety of entities to ensure data interoperability across different platforms and clarifies that it does not alter existing federal or state authorities over navigable waters or fisheries.

Summary of Significant Issues

There are several notable issues present in the bill's text. Firstly, the lack of specific funding provisions may lead to challenges in financing the development and constant updating of data, potentially resulting in resource constraints. The ambiguous use of terms such as "to the maximum extent practicable" might lead to inconsistencies in the bill’s implementation and enforcement. The timeline given for data publication is considered lengthy, possibly delaying public access to important information. Broad terms like "relevant stakeholders" and "non-Federal entities" could result in favoritism, while potential conflicts of interest might arise due to the involvement of private partners and nonprofits. Technical language also presents a barrier to general public understanding. Additionally, the bill's nondisclosure clause could conflict with transparency aims if sensitive information is not adequately defined under applicable law.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill could enable better public understanding and access to information about federal waterways, potentially aiding recreational users in planning their activities more effectively by knowing about any restrictions or safety concerns. If implemented as intended, the public could benefit from a centralized, easily accessible repository of data that enhances transparency concerning federal water management.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For recreational users such as fishermen, boaters, and outdoor enthusiasts, the bill might have positive effects by providing more comprehensive information about when and where federal waters can be accessed or used, thereby improving safety and compliance. However, delays in publishing this information due to the extended timeline might temporarily restrict these benefits.

For government agencies, the bill facilitates coordination, possibly improving the management of federal waterways through shared data standards. Yet, the financial implications due to the absence of explicit funding might strain agency resources.

The inclusion of private sector partners and nonprofits could bring in expertise and innovation, potentially enhancing the quality and accessibility of data. However, concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest need to be managed to prevent any perceived bias or unfair advantage.

In conclusion, while the bill sets a foundation for improving access to important data about federal waterways, several issues need to be addressed to ensure its successful implementation and to maximize the potential benefits for the public and relevant stakeholders.

Issues

  • The absence of specific funding provisions in Sections 2, 3, and 4 can lead to difficulties in implementation, as there is no clarity on how the development, publication, and constant updating of data will be financed, potentially leading to resource constraints.

  • Ambiguity in language in Section 4 related to the phrase 'to the maximum extent practicable' may result in inconsistent enforcement or accountability issues, as it could be interpreted variably, affecting public access to timely and relevant data.

  • The timeline of 'not later than 4 years' for the publication of data in Section 4(a) might be too long, delaying public access to crucial and up-to-date information on federal waterways and fishing restrictions, which may affect both recreational and commercial stakeholders.

  • The broad and undefined terms such as 'relevant stakeholders' in Section 3 and 'non-Federal entities' in Section 5 could lead to potential favoritism or lack of transparency in consultations and partnerships, raising ethical concerns.

  • The potential conflicts of interest mentioned in Section 5 due to the inclusion of a variety of partners, such as nonprofit organizations and the private sector, if not properly monitored, could undermine impartiality in the implementation of the Act.

  • The technical language used in Section 4, such as 'geographic information system data,' might not be easily understood by the general public, possibly limiting accessibility and comprehension of important data.

  • The provision requiring updates to certain data 'not less frequently than 2 times each year' in Section 4(e) may not ensure the data remains current, especially for areas where conditions change rapidly, affecting decision-making.

  • Section 6 lacks clarity on the enforcement mechanisms or how agencies might interpret their responsibilities, which could result in differing implementations and confusion.

  • The nondisclosure clause in Section 4(f) regarding certain sensitive information could conflict with transparency objectives, especially if not clearly outlined or justified under 'applicable law.'

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that it can be officially referred to as the “Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill provides definitions for key terms: "Federal fishing restriction area" refers to places where fishing is limited or banned by NOAA; "Federal waterway" is any water partly or entirely managed by the Secretary of Commerce; "Federal waterway restriction" denotes limits on the use of such waterways as regulated by law; and "Secretary" specifically means the Secretary of Commerce.

3. Data standardization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is required to work with relevant stakeholders to develop and adopt standards for collecting and sharing geospatial data related to outdoor recreation on federal waterways and areas with federal fishing restrictions. This must be done within 31 months after the law is enacted, including the data mentioned in section 4.

4. Data publication and accessibility Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is required to provide public access to detailed geographic data about Federal waterways and fishing restrictions through an online platform, ensuring it is easy to find and update, while allowing public comments and ensuring certain sensitive information remains private. They must update these datasets regularly and provide navigation and bathymetric data, while maintaining a mechanism for notifying users of new data.

5. Cooperation and coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill allows the Secretary to work with various non-Federal and Federal entities, including experts and organizations, to implement the Act. The Secretary must also ensure that geospatial data is compatible among agencies and clarify that this data follows Federal, State, and Tribal regulations.

6. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill clarifies that nothing in it will change the definition of "navigable waters," alter the authority of federal or state agencies to regulate navigable waters, or affect their roles in managing fisheries.