Overview

Title

To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 742 is like a promise from the grown-ups in charge, saying that until 2035, things bought from Haiti won't have extra fees. This bill makes sure certain special things from Haiti still get friendly treatment when they come into the country.

Summary AI

S. 742 aims to extend the duty-free treatment of certain imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act until September 30, 2035. The bill, known as the “Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025,” seeks to amend specific sections of the act to update definitions and limitations, and intends to restore preferential treatment for certain items that lost eligibility due to changes in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The President is also required to proclaim necessary changes to reinstate this preferential treatment.

Published

2025-02-26
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-26
Package ID: BILLS-119s742is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
649
Pages:
4
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 203
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 36
Entities: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.17
Average Sentence Length:
59.00
Token Entropy:
4.85
Readability (ARI):
31.05

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025, aims to extend the duty-free treatment of imports from Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. This extension is intended to bolster economic ties and trade with Haiti by providing preferential treatment for specific imports.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, introduced by a bipartisan group of senators, seeks to amend existing trade rules to support Haiti's economic development through extended preferential trade agreements. Specifically, the bill proposes several amendments to the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act:

  1. It sets a new applicable percentage for certain trade agreements and modifies the quantitative limits related to apparel imports.
  2. It extends the duty-free treatment for imports from Haiti until September 30, 2035.
  3. It allows the President to restore preferential treatment for certain categories of goods that became ineligible in the past due to changes in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key issue with the bill is the lack of clarity on how the applicable percentage of 60% or more was determined and whether this figure will be reassessed periodically. This could affect future trade calculations and agreements.

There's also potential ambiguity introduced by the phrasing change from "each of the 16 succeeding 1-year periods" to "any of the succeeding 1-year periods," which may confuse stakeholders about the duration of the amendments' applicability.

The restoration of preferential treatment for certain goods lacks specificity regarding which articles are affected. This omission might lead to misunderstandings or perceptions of favoritism.

Lastly, the procedure under which the President may proclaim necessary modifications to the tariff schedule is not clearly defined, potentially leaving room for interpretation and inconsistent application.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, the extension of duty-free treatment for imports from Haiti might help Haitian industries, potentially resulting in economic benefits that stabilize the region. This stability can have indirect positive effects on U.S. regional interests, potentially reducing migration pressures from Haiti.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

From a positive perspective, Haitian exporters stand to benefit significantly from extended duty-free access to U.S. markets, as it could boost trade, increase exports, and support economic development within Haiti. This might maintain or create new jobs, contributing to economic growth in the nation.

For U.S. stakeholders, such as apparel retailers, this bill may lower costs by enabling continued access to Haitian-made goods at reduced tariff rates, potentially benefiting consumers through reduced prices. However, this could negatively impact domestic producers of similar goods, who may face increased competition from lower-cost imports.

Furthermore, the short review period for tariff schedule modifications might cause issues with oversight and transparency, impacting policymakers' ability to appropriately vet and respond to proposed changes. This could lead to hurried decisions that do not fully consider the domestic economic landscape or the interests of affected industries.

Issues

  • The termination condition specified in Section 2, subsection (h), extends duty-free treatment until September 30, 2035. The long duration might not be justified without thorough evaluation, which could have significant implications for domestic industries and international trade relations.

  • In Section 3, the section does not specify the specific articles or categories of articles affected by the restoration of preferential treatment, leading to potential ambiguity and possibly affecting stakeholders' understanding.

  • In Section 2, the term 'applicable percentage' is defined as 60 percent or more starting from December 20, 2017. There is a need for clarification on how this percentage was determined and whether it should be reassessed, considering its potential long-term implications on trade with Haiti.

  • The amendment to subparagraph (C) in Section 2, involving 'quantitative limitations,' may be difficult for stakeholders to comprehend, specifically concerning the calculation and data availability for aggregate square meter equivalents.

  • In Section 3, the timeline for the 'effective date of proclamation' is very short, at only two business days after submission to relevant committees, which might not allow adequate time for thorough review, potentially leading to procedural and legislative oversight.

  • In Section 2, subsection (b)(2), the amendment replacing 'each of the 16 succeeding 1-year periods' with 'any of the succeeding 1-year periods' introduces ambiguity about the duration of applicability and could have implications for future economic assessments.

  • The term 'proclamation' in Section 3 is used without a clear definition of procedure or process, potentially leading to varying interpretations and impacting the consistency and transparency of its implementation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title of the Act, which is called the "Haiti Economic Lift Program Extension Act of 2025".

2. Extension of special rules for Haiti under Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act by adjusting definitions and extending certain special rules for Haiti. It changes the "applicable percentage" to 60% or more starting December 20, 2017, modifies quantitative limitations for preferential treatment of apparel articles, and extends duty-free treatment under the act until September 30, 2035.

3. Restoration of eligibility of certain articles for preferential treatment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the President to change the U.S. Tariff Schedule to make certain articles from the Caribbean eligible again for trade benefits they lost due to past changes. These benefits apply to items that were eligible in December 2006 but became ineligible before this new law and will become effective at least two business days after a report is submitted to the relevant Congressional committees.