Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 711 is a law that wants to help car makers in the USA by giving them extra money benefits if they pay their workers well and keep making cars in the country. It also changes some rules about how cars should make less pollution, but some people are worried this could end up making the air dirtier.
Summary AI
S. 711, titled the "Transportation Freedom Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide a double deduction for wages paid to workers in the U.S. automobile manufacturing industry, under certain conditions. It sets criteria for automobile manufacturers to qualify for the deduction, including domestic production minimums and benefits offered to workers and retirees. Additionally, the bill repeals existing emissions standards, prohibits future emissions waivers, and establishes new standards for vehicle emissions and fuel efficiency, focusing on achievable technological advancements and economic feasibility.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, introduced in the 119th Congress, primarily aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to offer enhanced tax deductions to automobile manufacturers in the United States. It is named the "Transportation Freedom Act." The legislation is divided into several titles dealing with different aspects, including supporting American automobile manufacturing through tax incentives, repealing various emissions standards, and establishing new greenhouse gas and fuel efficiency standards for vehicles. Overall, the bill is structured to incentivize domestic automobile production while adjusting the regulatory framework governing vehicle emissions and fuel economy.
Significant Issues
One of the most significant issues with the bill is the proposal to repeal several emissions standards previously set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which have regulated greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy. This repeal could have considerable environmental implications due to likely increases in vehicle emissions over time. Additionally, the elimination of emissions waivers, particularly those historically granted to California, could provoke legal challenges related to state rights and efforts to maintain stricter environmental standards.
The bill also proposes a generous tax deduction of 200% on certain wages paid by qualifying automobile manufacturers. This deduction may disproportionately benefit larger manufacturers over smaller ones due to the stringent conditions for eligibility that prioritize large-scale domestic production.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill addresses two major areas that can impact the public: environmental standards and economic incentives. On one hand, repealing emissions standards without clear alternative measures could affect air quality and climate change initiatives, potentially impacting public health. On the other hand, increased tax incentives for automotive companies aim to bolster the U.S. automobile industry, potentially creating more domestic jobs and stimulating economic growth.
Impact on Stakeholders
For automobile manufacturers, the bill presents a mix of opportunities and challenges. Larger manufacturers may benefit from the tax deductions and relaxed regulatory standards, which could lead to increased profits and expanded operations. However, smaller manufacturers might find it difficult to meet the eligibility requirements for these deductions, such as maintaining a high percentage of U.S.-based production and providing extensive employee benefits, including "platinum level" health coverage.
Environmental groups and states with strong emissions standards, such as California, could view the bill negatively. The repeals of emissions standards might be seen as undermining environmental protection efforts, and the revocation of state waivers may lead to significant policy battles.
Lastly, the ambiguity in some sections and the broad language regarding funding appropriations could lead to issues of fiscal accountability. Without clear limits or guidelines, there is concern that funds may be misused or lead to unchecked spending. Consequently, stakeholders from diverse areasâincluding legal, environmental, and financial sectorsâmight call for clearer legislative language and more transparent policy intentions.
Financial Assessment
The "Transportation Freedom Act," as presented in Bill S. 711, involves several financial elements that have significant potential impacts on both the automotive industry and broader fiscal policy.
Summary of Financial Allocations
The bill primarily introduces an enhanced deduction of up to 200% for wages paid to automotive manufacturing workers, under specific eligibility criteria. This deduction aims to support American automobile manufacturers by reducing taxable income more substantially than typical wage deductions.
In terms of authorizations, Title IV, Section 404 of the bill, includes a provision for appropriations defined as "such sums as are necessary" to carry out the new passenger automobile and heavy-duty vehicle standards. This open-ended funding authorization does not set clear financial limits, raising potential concerns about fiscal accountability.
Impact on Fiscal Policy and the Automotive Industry
The bill's generous wage deduction could lead to considerable fiscal impacts by potentially reducing the taxable income of qualifying manufacturers. By allowing a deduction equal to twice the eligible wages, the legislation has the potential to substantially decrease federal revenue derived from these companies. This could particularly favor larger manufacturers capable of meeting the stringent eligibility requirements, potentially skewing competitive dynamics within the industry.
Notably, the bill mandates that qualifying companies must not transfer production outside the United States and must offer platinum-level health coverage to employees and retirees. While these conditions aim to ensure workforce benefits, they could impose significant additional financial burdens on manufacturers, especially smaller firms that may struggle to provide such comprehensive healthcare plans.
Issues Relating to Financial Policies
One issue relates to the potential financial burden imposed by the requirement for offering platinum-level health coverage. This could strain the resources of smaller manufacturers, who might find it economically unfeasible to participate, thus limiting the benefits to larger corporations. Additionally, the neutrality requirement during labor organizing efforts might deter corporate strategies that could otherwise lead to cost efficiencies.
Furthermore, the provision for appropriations as "such sums as are necessary" underlines concerns about unchecked and unspecified government spending. Without a clearly defined fiscal limit, there is a risk of financial overspending or misuse that might not align with responsible fiscal management practices.
Overall, while the bill attempts to bolster domestic automotive production through financial incentives, the lack of detailed fiscal guidelines, particularly in taxpayer costs and appropriations, poses potential risks both to fiscal balance and smaller industry participants.
Issues
The repeal of various emissions standards for vehicles (Sections 201, 202, 203) could have substantial environmental impacts by potentially increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The rationale for these repeals is not clearly provided, leading to significant concern regarding transparency and the motivations behind these legislative changes.
The elimination of vehicle emissions waivers, including those for California (Section 301), could lead to legal challenges and disputes concerning state rights and environmental policies. This action might have broader implications for states that have historically adopted stricter standards.
The bill provides for a deduction equal to 200% of eligible wages (Section 101). This exceptionally generous deduction could lead to significant fiscal impacts and may favor larger manufacturers due to the eligibility criteria.
The requirement for qualifying taxpayers to maintain a 'neutral position' during labor organizing efforts (Section 101) introduces potential ambiguity and could conflict with organizational strategies, complicating compliance efforts.
The introduction of new CAFE and greenhouse gas emissions standards (Sections 402 and 411) lacks detailed guidance on implementation, enforcement, and evaluation. The absence of a clear mechanism or criteria could lead to unpredictability for automobile manufacturers.
The provision necessitating 'platinum level' health coverage (Sections 101 and 199B) may impose significant financial burdens on manufacturers, particularly smaller entities, potentially leading to economic strain or disincentives to participate.
The lack of clear limits or guidelines for appropriations (Section 404) cited as 'such sums as are necessary' presents opportunities for unchecked government spending, which could raise concerns about fiscal accountability.
There is no mention of alternative measures to address emissions after the repeal of the standards (Sections 201, 202, 203), raising questions about the long-term regulatory framework for vehicle emissions and fuel efficiency.
The legislative text uses complex legal references and lacks clarity in some sections (e.g., Sections 301, 403), which might make it difficult for stakeholders without legal backgrounds to comprehend the full implications of the changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Transportation Freedom Act is structured into several titles, focusing on support for American car manufacturers and modifying emissions standards. The Act includes proposals for enhancing tax deductions for wages in the automobile manufacturing sector, repealing existing emissions standards for various vehicle categories, and setting forth new standards for passenger and heavy-duty vehicles.
101. Enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a tax deduction for qualifying automobile manufacturing companies in the U.S. that pay wages meeting certain conditions. Companies can deduct 200% of specific wages if they ensure key aspects like high U.S.-based production, health coverage, retirement benefits, and fair labor practices, while ensuring those wages are above a certain percentile in the industry.
Money References
- â(b) Qualifying taxpayer.âFor purposes of this section, the term âqualifying taxpayerâ means an entity which, with respect to any taxable yearâ â(1) is engaged in the production of automobiles or automotive components in the United States, â(2) with respect to any automobiles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty trucks sold by the entity for use in the United States during the preceding taxable year, the final assembly (as defined in section 30D(d)(5)) of not less than 75 percent of such vehicles occurred in the United States, â(3) with respect to the manufacturing of finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells (including manufacturing pursuant to joint ventures or other collaborative manufacturing agreements) during the preceding taxable year, not less than 75 percent of such finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells which were incorporated into new automobiles, light-duty trucks, or heavy-duty trucks for sale by the entity were produced in the United States, â(4) during the preceding taxable year, did not transfer production outside of the United States of any automobile or automobile component manufactured in the United States, â(5) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all applicable individuals, offeredâ â(A) coverage for the applicable individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, and â(B) participation in a defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan that meets the applicable requirement of subsection (e), â(6) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all retired individuals who, prior to retirement, were applicable individuals, offered coverage for the retired individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, â(7) with respect to every $1,000,000,000 distributed as non-recurring dividends, or in stock which was redeemed (within the meaning of section 317(b)), by such entity during such taxable year, provided not less than $2,000 to each applicable individual through a profit-sharing plan, with such amount to be in addition to any prior commitment made by the entity pursuant to an existing profit-sharing plan, as determined as of the date of such distribution or redemption, and â(8) maintained a neutral position during the preceding taxable yearâ â(A) in any labor organization organizing effort, and â(B) with respect to the exercise of employees and labor organizations of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).
- â(2) LIMITATION.âThe amount of wages which may be taken into account under subsection (a)(1) with respect to any applicable individual shall not exceed $150,000 per taxable year.
199B. Wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For qualifying U.S. automobile manufacturers, this bill section allows a tax deduction of 200% on wages paid to workers if certain conditions are met, like ensuring health and retirement benefits, maintaining U.S.-based production, and supporting fair labor practices. The deduction is subject to wage limits and certification requirements to confirm eligibility.
Money References
- (b) Qualifying taxpayer.âFor purposes of this section, the term âqualifying taxpayerâ means an entity which, with respect to any taxable yearâ (1) is engaged in the production of automobiles or automotive components in the United States, (2) with respect to any automobiles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty trucks sold by the entity for use in the United States during the preceding taxable year, the final assembly (as defined in section 30D(d)(5)) of not less than 75 percent of such vehicles occurred in the United States, (3) with respect to the manufacturing of finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells (including manufacturing pursuant to joint ventures or other collaborative manufacturing agreements) during the preceding taxable year, not less than 75 percent of such finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells which were incorporated into new automobiles, light-duty trucks, or heavy-duty trucks for sale by the entity were produced in the United States, (4) during the preceding taxable year, did not transfer production outside of the United States of any automobile or automobile component manufactured in the United States, (5) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all applicable individuals, offeredâ (A) coverage for the applicable individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, and (B) participation in a defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan that meets the applicable requirement of subsection (e), (6) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all retired individuals who, prior to retirement, were applicable individuals, offered coverage for the retired individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, (7) with respect to every $1,000,000,000 distributed as non-recurring dividends, or in stock which was redeemed (within the meaning of section 317(b)), by such entity during such taxable year, provided not less than $2,000 to each applicable individual through a profit-sharing plan, with such amount to be in addition to any prior commitment made by the entity pursuant to an existing profit-sharing plan, as determined as of the date of such distribution or redemption, and (8) maintained a neutral position during the preceding taxable yearâ (A) in any labor organization organizing effort, and (B) with respect to the exercise of employees and labor organizations of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (c) Eligible wages.â (1) IN GENERAL.âFor purposes of this section, the term âeligible wagesâ means any wages paid or incurred by a qualifying taxpayer during the taxable year to any applicable individual, provided that the wages paid to such individual during such taxable year are not less than the 75th percentile of wages paid for the occupation of the individual (as designated in accordance with the Standard Occupational Classification System) with respect to the applicable 4-digit industry group code of the North American Industry Classification System.
- (2) LIMITATION.âThe amount of wages which may be taken into account under subsection (a)(1) with respect to any applicable individual shall not exceed $150,000 per taxable year.
201. Repeal of multipollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals a regulation set by the Environmental Protection Agency that established emissions standards for cars and trucks starting from the 2027 model year, meaning these standards will no longer be enforced.
202. Repeal of phase 3 heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency's "Phase 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles" rule, which means the rule will no longer be legally effective.
203. Repeal of CAFE standards rules Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that two sets of rules about fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, will be cancelled and will not be enforced.
301. Elimination of vehicle emissions waivers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that no more waivers will be granted for vehicle emission standards that differ from federal standards, revokes past waivers including those given to California for zero-emission vehicles, and repeals a section of the Clean Air Act.
401. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section defines key terms such as "Administrator" for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, "CAFE standards" for fuel economy requirements, "greenhouse gas emissions" for certain climate-changing gases, and "Secretary" for the head of Transportation.
402. Establishment of CAFE standards and greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the establishment of new fuel-efficiency (CAFE) and greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and light trucks for the years 2027 to 2035. The standards must be feasible and economically practical, with input from industry experts, and are subject to revision based on progress reports, while existing 2025 standards will remain in place if deadlines are not met.
403. Compliance with fleet average carbon dioxide emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that if a car manufacturer meets the federal fuel economy standards or compensates through penalties or credits, they are also considered to have met the greenhouse gas emissions standards. Similarly, if a manufacturer meets the greenhouse gas standards, they are considered to comply with fuel economy standards, ensuring a balance between both regulations.
404. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 404, the bill authorizes the allocation of necessary funds to implement the provisions outlined in this part of the legislation and any changes it introduces.
411. Establishment of heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes new greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles by the Environmental Protection Agency, set to begin no earlier than the 2027 model year. These standards must consider technological feasibility, economic impacts, and involve consultation with various stakeholders, while interim standards for earlier models align with existing regulations from 2016.