Overview

Title

To require Amtrak to install baby changing tables in bathrooms on passenger rail cars.

ELI5 AI

Amtrak is like a train company, and this bill wants all their new train bathrooms to have a place for parents to change their baby's diapers, just like they have in some public bathrooms. It also says the bathrooms should have signs so people know there's a baby changing spot inside.

Summary AI

S. 71, titled the "Baby Changing on Board Act," requires Amtrak to install baby changing tables in the bathrooms on passenger rail cars that are operated and owned by Amtrak and purchased after the enactment of this act. The bill mandates that every rail car have at least one restroom with a baby changing table, including those that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Additionally, restrooms with baby changing tables must have clear signage to indicate the presence of these facilities.

Published

2025-01-13
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-01-13
Package ID: BILLS-119s71is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
525
Pages:
3
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 156
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 22
Entities: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.02
Average Sentence Length:
37.50
Token Entropy:
4.87
Readability (ARI):
19.47

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The legislation titled "Baby Changing on Board Act" aims to mandate the inclusion of baby changing tables in at least one restroom per rail car on all passenger trains operated by Amtrak, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. The bill stipulates that these requirements apply to trains solicited for purchase after the enactment date, ensuring that new trains are equipped to better accommodate passengers traveling with infants. Additionally, the restrooms featuring these baby changing tables must be clearly marked with signage, facilitating easy identification for passengers in need.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the proposed legislation. Primarily, the requirement to retrofit all newly acquired or future Amtrak trains with baby changing tables could lead to substantial financial burdens. The bill does not detail how these costs will be covered, potentially straining Amtrak’s resources unless further funding provisions are introduced. The focus on trains solicited for purchase after the enactment date may inadvertently incentivize purchasing new trains over retrofitting existing ones, possibly leading to excessive and unnecessary spending.

A lack of clarity persists regarding the specifics of compliance and enforcement mechanisms, which may result in inconsistent application of the requirements. Additionally, the requirement excludes other rail operators and does not account for practical constraints such as limited space in older train models, potentially rendering the mandate challenging to implement across all scenarios.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this bill's impact on the public would likely be positive, particularly for families traveling with babies on Amtrak trains. The availability of baby changing tables would enhance travel convenience and accommodate the needs of families, potentially making rail travel a more attractive option for young parents. However, should the costs of this mandate be passed down to consumers through fare increases, the financial burden could offset the conveniences offered, impacting regular passengers negatively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Amtrak stands as the primary stakeholder in this legislative measure. While the introduction of baby changing tables can enhance passenger satisfaction and attract more diverse ridership, the associated costs could impose significant financial challenges. Without specified funding, Amtrak may face financial strain or pressure to increase ticket prices, affecting profitability and customer accessibility.

Families and guardians traveling with infants would find the bill's requirements favorable, as the availability of changing tables responds directly to their needs. Meanwhile, rail car manufacturers may experience an increase in demand for compliant designs leading to potential business growth opportunities.

Competing rail operators, however, might view this legislation as indirectly exclusionary or inequitable, as it prioritizes Amtrak within regulatory compliance without extending similar requirements across the rail network.

In conclusion, while the "Baby Changing on Board Act" proposes a progressive step towards passenger accommodation, it necessitates careful consideration regarding cost, compliance, and broad market implications to ensure its effectiveness and equity.

Issues

  • The mandate in Section 2 to install baby changing tables in all covered passenger rail trains, specifically targeting new trains acquired after the bill's enactment date, may incur significant costs for Amtrak without clear specification on how these costs will be funded or assessed. This could lead to financial strain on Amtrak unless further provisions are made to address funding.

  • Section 2 outlines that the new requirement applies only to trains solicited for purchase after enactment, potentially incentivizing Amtrak to acquire new trains over retrofitting existing ones, which might lead to higher costs and unnecessary expenditures.

  • The definition of 'covered passenger rail train' in Section 24314 may implicitly favor Amtrak by excluding other passenger rail operators, which could raise concerns of inequity and limit broader implementation strategies across different rail networks.

  • The lack of clarity regarding the enforcement and compliance mechanisms in Section 24314 for ensuring that all covered passenger rail trains are equipped with baby changing tables could lead to inconsistencies in application and difficulty in holding responsible parties accountable.

  • The omission of exceptions or considerations for train models where space or design might prevent feasible installation of baby changing tables in Section 2 could create compliance challenges and potential legal disputes if certain models cannot comply without significant alterations.

  • The requirement for signage indicating the presence of baby changing tables, as outlined in Section 2, lacks specificity regarding the standards and requirements (e.g., size, visibility), which might lead to inconsistent practices across different rail cars.

  • The specification in Section 24314 that baby changing tables must support a child with a body weight of up to 30 pounds might become outdated or require regular review, as average child weights vary across different demographics, potentially necessitating future amendments to the law.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states that the Act shall be known as the "Baby Changing on Board Act."

2. Installation of baby changing tables on Amtrak trains Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires that all Amtrak passenger trains purchased after a certain date must have baby changing tables in at least one restroom per rail car, including restrooms that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. These restrooms must also have clear signage indicating the presence of the baby changing tables.

24314. Baby changing tables Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The passage of the Baby Changing on Board Act mandates that all Amtrak trains procured after the law's enactment must have at least one baby changing table in a restroom of each rail car, including those that are ADA-compliant. Additionally, the restrooms with these tables must have clear signage indicating their presence.