Overview

Title

An Act To improve performance and accountability in the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The law is about making sure that parts of the government do a good job by checking up on them every year to see how well they're doing, sharing their progress online, and fixing any problems. It’s like when your teacher checks your homework regularly to make sure you're learning and doing your best.

Summary AI

S. 709, known as the "Federal Agency Performance Act of 2024," aims to improve the performance and accountability of federal agencies. It requires annual reviews of agencies' progress toward strategic goals, better coordination among personnel, and the identification of risks and improvement strategies. The bill also updates the federal performance website to ensure transparency and regular updates aligned with government performance goals and removes outdated pilot project requirements. Additionally, it mandates a report from the Comptroller General on the Act's effectiveness within 18 months of enactment.

Published

2024-12-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Enrolled Bill
Date: 2024-12-20
Package ID: BILLS-118s709enr

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
8
Words:
1,984
Pages:
5
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 517
Verbs: 161
Adjectives: 66
Adverbs: 21
Numbers: 94
Entities: 103

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.95
Average Sentence Length:
116.71
Token Entropy:
4.89
Readability (ARI):
58.73

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The legislation, titled the "Federal Agency Performance Act of 2024," is designed to enhance the performance and accountability of federal agencies. The Act mandates regular reviews of strategic goals, updates the Federal Performance Website to improve digital transparency, revises the process for setting government priority goals, and repeals outdated pilot projects. A key component of the bill involves establishing co-leaders from both the Executive Office of the President and relevant agencies to coordinate efforts toward achieving performance goals. Additionally, the Act requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to report on its effectiveness after 18 months.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the principal issues highlighted in the bill is the potential administrative burden that might arise from annual strategic reviews required in Section 2. Without clear evidence of the benefits, these routine checks could impose inefficiencies within agencies. Also, the lack of specific criteria for assessing progress towards strategic goals may result in inconsistent evaluations across different federal bodies.

Another matter pertains to the revisions to the Federal Performance Website outlined in Section 3. The bill lacks specific guidelines for the archiving of information, which could lead to inconsistencies and transparency issues. Moreover, different interpretations of compliance standards for digital experience could complicate the implementation across agencies.

The selection of co-leaders for performance goals as required in Section 5 lacks clarity in its criteria, potentially affecting fair representation from varying branches and agencies. Finally, in Section 6, the repeal of outdated pilot projects does not specify which projects are affected, leading to potential confusion about the legislative impacts.

Impacts on the Public

Broadly, the bill's aim to improve government performance and accountability is of potential benefit to the public by striving for more efficient and transparent federal operations. If effectively executed, it could usher in better management of federal goals and priorities, ultimately leading to improved public services.

However, the potential administrative burden and inefficiencies resulting from frequent reviews might adversely impact the effectiveness and delivery of these services. Furthermore, the complexities associated with interpreting compliance standards and assessing performance goals might hinder streamlined execution of governmental functions, affecting the overall efficiency with which services are rendered to citizens.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Agencies: The bill places significant demands on federal agencies, requiring them to conduct regular reviews and coordinate across different department levels. While aiming to bolster accountability, it might impose additional workloads, requiring agencies to potentially reallocate or increase staff resources.

Executive Office of the President: With its involvement in co-leading performance goals, the Executive Office may assume a more prominent role in directing agency priorities, which could streamline decision-making but also centralize governmental power.

General Public: An enhanced Federal Performance Website aims to make government operations more transparent and informative for the public. A robust digital platform might allow citizens greater insights into government progress and priorities, fostering higher levels of trust and accountability.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): The GAO is tasked with evaluating the law's effectiveness, yet the lack of defined resources for this task might lead to budgetary constraints, potentially impacting the comprehensiveness of the evaluation.

In conclusion, the "Federal Agency Performance Act of 2024" strives for increased accountability and performance in government operations yet embeds complexities and potential burdens that could affect its implementation and the stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The requirement for annual strategic reviews in Section 2 might lead to significant administrative burden on agencies without clear evidence of benefit, raising concerns about efficiency and resource allocation.

  • Lack of specific criteria or thresholds in Section 2 for assessing sufficient progress toward strategic goals may result in inconsistent evaluations and accountability across federal agencies.

  • The amendments to the Federal Performance Website in Section 3 do not specify mechanisms for archiving, posing a risk of inconsistencies, which might affect transparency and information preservation.

  • The vague definition of 'other types of evidence' in Section 2 could lead to subjective interpretations by agencies, causing variability in assessment standards.

  • Section 5's requirement for 'not fewer than 2 lead Government officials' does not clarify selection criteria, potentially impacting fair representation among branches and agencies.

  • The amendment in Section 3 poses challenges as agencies might interpret compliance requirements differently, potentially complicating digital experience standards.

  • Section 7 is complex, with intricate legal references that might be inaccessible to those without legal expertise, hindering public understanding.

  • The repeal of outdated pilot projects in Section 6 lacks specificity on which projects are repealed, leading to potential confusion regarding legislative impacts.

  • Section 8 does not specify any costs or budget allocations for the GAO report, leading to concerns about resource allocation and potential financial implications.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act states that it will be officially known as the "Federal Agency Performance Act of 2024."

2. Establishment of Strategic Reviews and Reporting Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 1121 of title 31, United States Code, requires federal agencies to annually review their progress towards strategic goals, using performance data and coordinating with relevant personnel. It mandates agencies to identify risks, assess contributions to goals, and suggest strategies for improvement in achieving these objectives, supported by various key officers. Additionally, Section 1116 is amended to include a summary of these reviews in agency reports.

3. Revisions to the Federal Performance Website Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the Federal Performance Website requirements by specifying what information must be included, how it should be organized and archived, and ensures compliance with digital experience standards. It also outlines expectations for reporting the achievements towards agency and government priority goals, comparing current results with planned performance over specific time periods.

4. Federal Government Priority Goals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law to specify that Federal Government Priority Goals must be updated at least once every Presidential term, made publicly available with the U.S. Government budget each new term, include plans for achieving each goal within a term, and reference budget contents that help achieve these goals.

5. Federal Government Priority Goal Co-Leaders Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law to require that each federal government performance goal be supported by at least two lead officials, one from the Executive Office of the President and another from an agency contributing to the goal, to jointly coordinate efforts to achieve it.

6. Repeal of Outdated Pilot Projects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section repeals outdated pilot projects by removing sections 1118 and 1119 from Chapter 11 of title 31 in the United States Code. It also updates related references by adjusting subsections and the table of sections accordingly.

7. Clarifying Amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes two clarifications: it updates the language about citing evidence-building activities in strategic plans to specify when it's applicable, and it changes the timing for agency performance reports to ensure they happen within 150 days.

8. GAO report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The GAO report section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to present a report to specific Senate and House committees 18 months after the law is enacted. This report will assess how effective the law and its changes are.