Overview
Title
To amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act to clarify and supplement the funding sources for United States victims of state-sponsored terrorism to ensure consistent and meaningful distributions from the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill aims to make sure that people in the U.S. who are hurt by state-sponsored terrorism get money more consistently from a special fund, and it mentions big money amounts tied to a company called Binance.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "American Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act," proposes amendments to the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act. It aims to clarify and enhance the funding sources available for U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism, ensuring consistent and meaningful payments from the existing fund designated for victims. The bill includes provisions for the transfer of certain funds from forfeitures, penalties, and fines to this fund and outlines the timing of these deposits, as well as annual payment guidelines. Additionally, the bill requires detailed reports on fund activity and balances to be submitted to Congress and made publicly available.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "American Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act," aims to amend the existing Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act. Primarily, it seeks to enhance and clarify the financial sources for the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund. The key objectives are to ensure consistent and substantial financial distributions to U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism by reallocating funds obtained from various legal settlements, forfeitures, and penalties. The bill outlines specific financial transfers, including those from the Binance Holdings Limited case, and mandates detailed reporting on the fund’s activity to enhance transparency and accountability.
Summary of Significant Issues
One prominent issue in the bill is the specific mention of the Binance Holdings Limited case, which involves significant financial sums. This specific mention raises concerns about potential favoritism, as other cases are not as thoroughly detailed. Furthermore, the bill is written in complex legal language, which may hinder public understanding and accessibility. There is also concern over the vague criteria for determining what makes a claim "eligible," potentially leading to ambiguity in who receives compensation. Additionally, the amendment allows for administrative costs to be covered by the fund but lacks specific oversight measures, creating a risk of unchecked spending. Lastly, the requirement for internal rather than independent verification in financial reporting processes raises issues about the transparency and oversight of the fund.
Impact on the Public
The bill has the potential to significantly impact both general public perceptions and specific stakeholders. From a public perspective, the bill’s focus on ensuring consistent financial support for victims of state-sponsored terrorism could be seen positively, demonstrating a commitment to aiding those affected by such acts. However, public trust may be compromised if concerns about transparency, favoritism, and complex legal wording are not adequately addressed. The emphasis on reallocating funds from forfeitures and penalties may also raise questions about prioritization within legal proceedings and resource distribution.
Impact on Stakeholders
For victims of state-sponsored terrorism, the bill could provide vital financial relief and compensation, potentially improving their quality of life and providing necessary resources for recovery. However, stakeholders could face challenges due to the ambiguity surrounding eligibility criteria and the potential for delays in payments, which could create uncertainty for those relying on timely financial support.
For legal institutions and government agencies, the bill might increase administrative responsibilities, particularly in ensuring compliance with amended reporting requirements and fund management. The vague language surrounding administrative costs and eligible claims could lead to disputes or inefficiencies, unless clarified through subsequent regulations or guidelines.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance support for victims of terrorism, addressing the highlighted issues will be crucial in ensuring that it effectively achieves its objectives and maintains public confidence in the legislative process.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, known as the "American Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act," intends to amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act by updating and enhancing the procedures and sources of funding for compensation to U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism. Here, we examine the financial references and allocations articulated in the bill and how they relate to the issues identified.
Financial Transfers and Allocations
Significant Financial Transfers and Funds Mentioned:
- Binance Holdings Limited: The bill specifically mentions significant financial sums tied to Binance Holdings Limited:
- $898,619,225: Already deposited into the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund as part of a forfeiture.
- $1,912,031,763: Additional funds and proceeds expected to be deposited, derived from legal proceedings involving Binance.
These amounts suggest a prominent focus on this particular case. The detailed mention raises potential concerns about favoritism and transparency, as noted in the issues, especially when other similar cases might not be addressed with equal specificity.
Crime Victims Fund (CVF): The bill also directs that $1,505,475,575 be deposited into the CVF, emphasizing the redistribution of large financial penalties between various government funds. Yet, the clarity and fairness in distributing these funds remain subjects of concern, particularly when addressing how other potential funds or entities are mentioned.
DOJ Assets Forfeiture Fund and Treasury Forfeiture Fund: The bill authorizes transferring 50% of their "excess unobligated balance". This involves complex financial calculations and criteria that are not explicitly laid out in the bill, contributing to ambiguity about how these figures are determined and potentially being obscured from public scrutiny.
Timing and Operational Challenges
The bill puts forth specific timing requirements for depositing and transferring funds: - Funds and proceeds must be deposited within 60 days after receipt. - These frameworks aim to structure fund management; however, these stringent timelines may strain operational capacities and offer opportunities for manipulation without transparent oversight, as identified in the issues section.
Reporting and Accountability
The bill mandates annual reports on fund activity, which include detailed listings of substantial forfeitures or penalties above $10,000,000. Nonetheless, the issues raise concerns regarding the reliance on internal verification of such reports, potentially leading to reduced transparency and accountability.
Use of Funds for Administrative Costs
There is an allocation for administrative costs drawn from the fund, yet the bill does not specify a concrete cap on these expenditures. This aspect could lead to unchecked spending without detailed accountability, posing a risk of resource exploitation, an issue highlighted in the commentary.
Forfeitures and Legal Fairness
Subsection dealing with forfeitures states all related funds, without regard to the nature of the offense, must be deposited into the fund, raising due process concerns. The broad phrasing may inadvertently sidestep detailed case evaluations necessary for equitable fund allocation.
The bill portrays a meticulous approach to funding U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism while simultaneously introducing complexities and ambiguities that could impact fairness, transparency, and accountability within the funds' management. The emphasis on certain financial proceedings over others may call for further scrutiny to ensure balanced and equitable application of justice and compensation.
Issues
The amendment involves significant financial transfers specifically mentioning Binance Holdings Limited with detailed financial sums ($898,619,225 and $1,912,031,763), suggesting potential favoritism towards this particular case over others without equally detailed mention of other entities, which could raise concerns about fairness and transparency. [Section 2]
The use of complex legal language throughout the amendment, including terms such as 'subclause', 'excess unobligated balance', and others, may make it difficult for the general public to understand, impacting transparency and accessibility. [Sections 2, 3, 5]
The criteria and methodology for determining the 'excess unobligated balance' for both the DOJ Assets Forfeiture Fund and the Treasury Forfeiture Fund lack clarity, which could lead to ambiguity and lack of transparency in fund allocations. [Section 2]
The timing requirements under sections dealing with fund transfers and payments ('30 days after receipt', '60 days after the receipt', etc.) may introduce operational challenges and create potential for delays or manipulation without clear oversight mechanisms. [Sections 2, 3]
The legislation refers heavily to cross-references to other acts, subsections, and code sections. This reliance on external documents can reduce accessibility and clarity for those without legal expertise. [Sections 4, 5, 7]
There is a lack of specificity and criteria in defining what makes a claim 'eligible', which could lead to ambiguity regarding which claimants receive compensation, potentially causing legal and ethical concerns. [Section 4]
The amendment allows for administrative costs to be drawn from the Fund without specifying a cap or detailed accountability measures, risking unchecked spending and resource exploitation. [Section 6]
The published reports on fund activity rely on internal verification rather than independent verification, which may reduce oversight and transparency in the handling of public funds. [Section 5]
The broad phrase 'without regard to the nature of the offense' in section '(iii) FORFEITURES' may raise concerns about due process and fairness in legal proceedings related to fund allocations. [Section 3]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill specifies the short title, stating that the Act is named the “American Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act.”
2. Transfer of certain funds into united states victims of state sponsored terrorism fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes amendments to the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act, which involve distributing funds from legal settlements, specifically from the Binance Holdings Limited case and various forfeiture funds, to support crime victims. It also ensures these amendments will not interfere with previously designated funds for law enforcement or court-ordered victim restitution.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 404 of the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 U.S.C. 20144) is amended— (1) in subsection (d)(4), by adding at the end the following: “(E) FIFTH-ROUND PAYMENTS.—All fifth-round payments required to be authorized by the Special Master on or before January 1, 2025, shall be distributed to eligible claimants not later than March 14, 2025, or, if an eligible claimant has not provided the Special Master with the payment information required for distribution, as soon as practicable after the date of receipt by the Special Master of such information.”; and (2) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end the following: “(C) CERTAIN ASSIGNED AND FORFEITED ASSETS.— “(i) BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED.— “(I) IN GENERAL.— “(aa) ALREADY DEPOSITED.—The sum of $898,619,225, corresponding to the funds, and the net proceeds from the sale of property, forfeited to the United States from or in connection with the plea agreement in the proceedings captioned as United States v. Binance Holdings Limited, No. 2:23–cr–00178 (RAJ) (W.D. Wash. filed Nov. 14, 2023), already deposited into the Fund.
- “(bb) ADDITIONAL FUNDS.—The sum of $1,912,031,763, corresponding to a portion of the funds, and the net proceeds from the sale of property, forfeited or paid to the United States arising from or in connection with the proceedings described in item (aa) or any related civil or administrative proceedings.
- “(II) DEPOSIT IN CVF.—The sum of $1,505,475,575, from the funds, and the net proceeds from the sale of property, paid to the United States arising from or in connection with proceedings described in subclause (I)(aa) shall be deposited into the Crime Victims Fund established under section 1402 of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (34 U.S.C. 20101).
3. Timing of deposit of penalties and fines into the united states victims of state sponsored terrorism fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act, specifying that all money and property taken by the government after breaking certain laws related to international trade with enemy nations must be deposited into a special fund. This fund supports victims of state-sponsored terrorism, and the deposits must be made either within 60 days of receiving the funds or 30 days after this rule comes into effect, whichever is later.
4. Annual payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act to specify that, starting January 1, 2026, and every January 1 thereafter, additional payments will be made to eligible claimants based on funds received and interest earned, unless they are needed for administrative costs. These payments should be distributed as soon as possible within the calendar year of authorization.
5. Report of fund activity Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines new reporting requirements for the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act, including an annual report by the Special Master on the Fund's balance and activity, a public release of this report by the Attorney General, a GAO report on large forfeitures and fines since 2020, and a triennial GAO report evaluating the Fund's administration and sufficiency.
Money References
- “(v) GAO REPORT REGARDING PROCEEDS AVAILABLE FOR DEPOSIT TO THE FUND.—Not later than April 1, 2025, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report, which shall include— “(I) a listing of all funds, and the net proceeds from the sale of property, forfeited or paid to the United States since January 1, 2020, in an amount greater than $10,000,000 as a criminal penalty or fine in any matter, sufficient to identify the source, including, if applicable, the case name and the amount of each forfeiture or payment, except to the extent that any sealing order requires any portion of such information to remain confidential; “(II) a listing of all funds, and the net proceeds from the sale of property, forfeited or paid to the United States since January 1, 2020, in an amount greater than $10,000,000 as a civil penalty or fine in any matter, sufficient to identify the source, including, if applicable, the case name and the amount of each forfeiture or payment, except to the extent that any sealing order requires any portion of such information to remain confidential; “(III) an explanation of where each amount described in subclause (I) or (II) was deposited, including deposits into the Fund or the Crime Victims Fund, which shall include the nature of each such deposit, and the statutory basis for each such deposit; and “(IV) any interest amount earned on each amount described in subclause (I) or (II).
6. Administrative costs and use of department of justice personnel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 404(b)(1) of the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act allows the Special Master to use up to 10 Department of Justice personnel to help with their tasks. The costs for these personnel and any other administrative expenses will be covered by the Fund specified in the Act.
7. Additional reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends part of a law related to compensating victims of terrorism, specifying that any leftover money in a special fund should be moved to another fund and then distributed to eligible victims by certain dates in 2025.