Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
ELI5 AI
S. 700 is a plan where the government gives some land in Arizona to a county for free if they promise to use it to help veterans, but if they use it for something else, the land can go back to the government.
Summary AI
S. 700 is a bill that proposes the transfer of the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site from the federal government to Gila County, Arizona. If Gila County requests it within 180 days of the bill's enactment, the Secretary of Agriculture is required to convey approximately 232.9 acres of national forest land at no cost, provided that Gila County covers all associated costs of the transfer. The land must be used to support veterans, and if it is used for any other purpose, it could revert back to the U.S. government. The transfer includes conditions like the county paying for surveys and environmental and historic preservation compliance.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, identified as S. 700 in the 119th Congress, proposes the transfer of a specific piece of federal land, known as the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site, to Gila County, Arizona. The stipulated land consists of approximately 232.9 acres and is located within the Tonto National Forest. The bill specifies that the land is to be conveyed to the county at no charge, provided the county submits a request within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The land must be used strictly for the purpose of serving and supporting veterans. If the land is used otherwise, it can be reclaimed by the United States at the discretion of the Secretary of Agriculture. The county is required to cover costs associated with the conveyance, including surveys and environmental analyses.
Significant Issues
Several notable issues have been identified within this legislative proposal. Firstly, there is a potential for perceived wasteful spending since the land is to be transferred without financial consideration, potentially resulting in a loss of federal revenue. This aspect might invite scrutiny about why public assets are being allotted without compensation.
Additionally, the bill raises favoritism concerns. Awarding valuable land exclusively to Gila County without a competitive process could be perceived as giving preferential treatment, potentially bypassing more equitable means of allocation.
A reversion clause stipulates that the land must revert to federal control if it is used for purposes other than supporting veterans. However, the enforcement of this clause is left at the Secretary of Agriculture's discretion, creating uncertainty over how strictly or uniformly such decisions might be implemented.
The bill includes language where the Secretary of Agriculture retains broad discretion to impose "such other terms and conditions" to protect U.S. interests, which some may find unclear or vague. This provision allows considerable leeway without specific guidance.
Concerns about environmental liabilities are also prominent. The bill exempts the Secretary from providing covenants or warranties related to environmental conditions on the land, which could result in Gila County inheriting unforeseen liabilities.
Public and Stakeholder Impacts
The public stands to gain from the bill if Gila County effectively uses the land to support veterans, enhancing services for a valued community. However, the broader public might see this as a loss of potential federal revenue if the land was otherwise monetized.
Positive Impacts: Veterans and the residents of Gila County would benefit if the land is used effectively to enhance veteran support services. For the county, acquiring additional land assets could bolster local initiatives and community projects aimed at aiding veterans.
Negative Impacts: Taxpayers across the nation might view the free conveyance of valuable property without compensation as unfair, potentially encouraging similar requests from other localities. Furthermore, the lack of environmental assurances may pose unforeseen risks for Gila County, including possibly substantial remedial costs if environmental issues are discovered post-transfer.
In summary, while the bill holds substantial potential benefits for veterans within Gila County, it also raises issues of fairness, fiscal responsibility, and environmental liability that merit thoughtful consideration and, possibly, additional safeguards.
Issues
Potential wasteful spending: The bill mandates the conveyance of federal land to Gila County without consideration, resulting in a potential loss of revenue for the federal government. This is specified in Section 1, subsection (d)(2).
Favoritism concerns: The bill appears to favor Gila County by providing them with land at no cost, without requiring competitive bidding or compensation. This may raise questions about preferential treatment. This concern is related to Section 1, subsection (d)(2).
Reversion clause creates uncertainty: The reversion clause allows the U.S. to reclaim the land if not used for supporting veterans, but the decision is at the Secretary's discretion, creating uncertainty about the enforcement. This is specified in Section 1, subsection (g)(2).
Unclear language: The phrase 'such other terms and conditions as the Secretary considers to be appropriate to protect the interests of the United States' is vague and gives sole discretion to the Secretary of Agriculture without clear guidelines. This is found in Section 1, subsection (d)(4).
Ambiguity in environmental conditions: The bill specifies that the Secretary is not required to provide any covenant or warranty for the land, which may lead to ambiguity regarding liabilities associated with environmental issues on the land. This is outlined in Section 1, subsection (f).
Complex language: Legal references within the bill, such as 'division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code' and various sections regarding environmental and historical analyses, may be difficult for laypersons to understand without additional context, as seen in Section 1, subsections (e)(2) and (e)(3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Conveyance of Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Gila County, Arizona is set to receive the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site from the United States, without any payment, if they request it within 180 days and use it to support veterans. The transfer involves approximately 232.9 acres and comes with terms ensuring U.S. interests are protected and that the land reverts to the U.S. if misused.