Overview

Title

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide a phase-in for plasma-derived products under the manufacturer discount program.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to change how we buy special medicines made from blood, by slowly changing their prices over a few years so it's not too fast or sudden.

Summary AI

The bill S. 694 proposes an amendment to the Social Security Act, specifically targeting the manufacturer discount program for plasma-derived products. It introduces a phased approach for these products, adjusting the "discounted price" of such medicines over several years starting in 2026. The bill defines plasma-derived products as drugs derived from human blood or plasma, and it spells out a gradual reduction in payment percentages for these products up to 2032. Certain exceptions and limitations, like those for specific beneficiary types and small manufacturers, are also included in the bill.

Published

2025-02-24
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-24
Package ID: BILLS-119s694is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
279
Pages:
5
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 91
Verbs: 21
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 8
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.77
Average Sentence Length:
39.86
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
19.13

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, titled the "Preserving Life-saving Access to Specialty Medicines in America Act" or the "PLASMA Act", aims to amend the Social Security Act by implementing a phased approach for determining discounted pricing on plasma-derived products within the manufacturer discount program. Specifically, this bill modifies pricing rules starting in 2026, creating a graduated scale of discounts that continues through 2032.

General Summary of the Bill

The PLASMA Act seeks to provide a smooth transition for how plasma-derived products are priced under the discount program. The goal is to gradually reduce the percentage of the negotiated price that constitutes the "discounted price" for these types of drugs over several years. Starting in 2026, the percentage is set at 99% and is planned to taper down to 80% by 2032 for those who have reached their out-of-pocket costs thresholds, marking a strategy for adjustment over time. This provision specifies details such as defining what constitutes a plasma-derived product, and it outlines certain limitations on the applicability of these rules, specifically excluding some drugs and manufacturers from the program.

Significant Issues

One key issue is the potential for market favoritism. By creating a unique discount structure for plasma-derived products, the bill could favor manufacturers of these drugs over others. This preference may lead to imbalances in the pharmaceutical market if such pricing advantages are not appropriately justified or balanced for other medicinal products.

Additionally, the bill outlines a specific decreasing discount percentage over time, from 99% to 80%, but it does not provide transparency or rationale for the chosen figures. This lack of explanation raises questions about the fairness and equity in determining these percentages, potentially impacting stakeholders such as other drug manufacturers and consumers.

There are exclusions from this discount phase-in for certain drugs dispensed to low income subsidy (LIS) beneficiaries and those manufactured by specified small manufacturers. These exclusions could lead to disparities and perceptions of favoritism within the pharmaceutical landscape.

The legislation's complexity, particularly with the detailed legal references and conditions involving the "annual out-of-pocket threshold," may pose challenges for understanding and implementation. This could affect how well both beneficiaries and manufacturers can navigate and benefit from the changes.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the bill's adjustment in discounts for plasma-derived products could positively impact stakeholders in the plasma product industry by gradually shifting financial burdens, potentially fostering an environment for stability and growth within this sector. However, these same changes could also inadvertently lead to higher costs for consumers if the discounts are not sufficient to offset price increases over time, thereby impacting public access to these medicines.

From a regulatory perspective, excluding certain products and manufacturers could lead to frustrations or legal challenges if perceived as unfair by those outside the program's scope. For beneficiaries, particularly those not eligible for additional discounts, such legislation could escalate healthcare expenses, especially if their treatment involves non-qualifying drugs.

Overall, while the bill aims to create orderliness in the transition for drug pricing, successfully balancing stakeholder needs with public health interests will be critical to ensure equity, accessibility, and consistency in the pharmaceutical market.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 2 potentially favors manufacturers of plasma-derived products by creating a unique discount structure that could be more beneficial compared to other products, leading to potential market imbalances and favoritism (Section 2).

  • The rationale for the specific decreasing discount percentages over time for plasma-derived products is not explained, raising concerns about transparency and equity in how these figures were determined and how they may impact different stakeholders (Section 2).

  • The exclusion of certain drugs dispensed to LIS beneficiaries and those by specified small manufacturers from the discount phase-in could result in disparities, affecting fairness among different manufacturers and beneficiaries without clear justification (Section 2).

  • The complexity of the legislation, with detailed legal references and conditions based on 'annual out-of-pocket threshold,' may hinder understanding and effective implementation both for beneficiaries and for manufacturers (Section 2).

  • There is an absence of adjustments for potential future changes in the pharmaceutical market or industry, which could impact the long-term effectiveness and adaptability of the bill (Section 2).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states the short title, which is the name by which the Act can be referred to or cited. This Act is called the "Preserving Life-saving Access to Specialty Medicines in America Act" or simply the "PLASMA Act".

2. Phase-in for plasma-derived products under manufacturer discount program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the Social Security Act introduces a phase-in period for the discounted pricing of plasma-derived products starting in 2026. It defines terms and percentages related to discounts, specifies which drugs and manufacturers fall under these new rules, and lists exceptions where this phase-in does not apply.