Overview
Title
To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to permit certain grants to be used for accessory dwelling units, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Farmhouse-to-Workforce Housing Act of 2025 wants to let people use certain money to build small homes next to their big homes, but it has rules about who can get the money and how it must be used.
Summary AI
S. 686, also known as "The Farmhouse-to-Workforce Housing Act of 2025," seeks to change the Housing Act of 1949. It proposes allowing housing preservation grants to be used for accessory dwelling units, which are smaller living spaces on the same property as a single-family home. The bill outlines specific conditions under which assistance can be provided, including limits on the amount of assistance, requirements for the age of housing, and rules for owners of accessory units. Furthermore, the bill specifies administrative cost limitations and authorizes funding to support these initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Farmhouse-to-Workforce Housing Act of 2025" proposes amendments to the Housing Act of 1949. This bill primarily enables grants to be used for constructing accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and outlines how these funds should be used. ADUs are smaller residential units that can be either within, attached to, or separate from a single-family home. The bill includes stipulations on how the funds should be allocated, restrictions on how the housing can be used, and sets limits on the beneficiaries’ income.
Significant Issues
One of the major issues with the bill is the allocation of up to 20 percent of the grant funds for administrative costs. This could potentially reduce the resources available for the actual construction or rehabilitation of housing units, leading to inefficient use of taxpayer money. Moreover, the bill imposes a requirement that beneficiaries must earn no more than 150 percent of the area median income. This could exclude individuals who still need financial support due to high cost-of-living areas or other personal financial burdens.
Furthermore, the bill requires that owners reside in either the primary or the accessory dwelling unit. This could limit the flexibility for property owners who might want to rent out both units. Another complexity arises from the inflation adjustment clause, making it cumbersome to administer annually. Also, the requirement for grant recipients to repay funds if they breach residency or ownership conditions could deter participation due to fears of unforeseen financial repercussions.
Impact on the Public
The general public might benefit from such a bill as it aims to address housing shortages by incentivizing the creation of additional living spaces. ADUs could provide flexible living arrangements for families, accommodate aging relatives, or serve as rental spaces to generate income.
However, potential homeowners might find themselves restricted by the imposed conditions, which could hinder participation and thus limit the desired impact on increasing housing availability. The strict income cap and residency requirements could particularly disadvantage those who might inadvertently fall outside these criteria but still face housing insecurities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Property owners and prospective beneficiaries are directly affected. On the positive side, the bill offers financial assistance for creating additional housing, potentially increasing property value and providing new income opportunities. Yet, the stringent conditions and possible financial penalties pose risks to these stakeholders.
Local communities could benefit from increased housing availability. However, if the administrative costs absorb too much of the allocated funds, the economic and social benefits may be minimal. For state and local governments tasked with implementing these programs, the complexity of adjusting financial caps for inflation and ensuring compliance with the application of funds could present additional administrative challenges.
Overall, while the intent of the bill is commendable in its attempt to expand housing options, the conditions and restrictions may need reconsideration to achieve a broader, more effective impact.
Financial Assessment
The bill, S. 686, also referred to as "The Farmhouse-to-Workforce Housing Act of 2025," contains several financial provisions focused on the use of housing preservation grants for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). These provisions outline the funding limits, conditions for assistance, and allocation of resources for administrative purposes which have raised several issues as identified in the analysis.
Financial Summary and Allocations
The bill authorizes the appropriation of $200,000,000 to support its initiatives, with the funds remaining available until fully expended. Assistance under this section for single-family housing caps individual assistance at $200,000, while assistance for accessory dwelling units may not exceed 50% of their total cost or $100,000 per unit. The latter amount is subject to adjustments for inflation after December 2026, based on the Consumer Price Index.
Administrative Cost Concerns
The provision allowing up to 20% of the funds to be used for administrative costs may raise concerns regarding efficiency. There is a risk that allocating such a significant portion to administrative expenses could detract from the resources available for the actual housing assistance projects, leading to a possible inefficiency in how taxpayer money is utilized.
Income Restrictions
The requirement that beneficiaries earn no more than 150% of the area median income could be overly restrictive, thereby limiting the pool of eligible applicants who may still require financial assistance. This could reduce the program's effectiveness in reaching certain individuals or communities who are marginally above the income threshold but still in need.
Residency and Ownership Penalties
The bill sets forth a penalty requiring the return of the full amount of assistance if residency or ownership conditions are not met. This may discourage potential applicants who fear financial liability due to unforeseen circumstances, potentially limiting the program's popularity and success.
Inflation Adjustment Complexity
Adjusting the $100,000 cap for inflation involves a complex formula based on the Consumer Price Index, which could complicate annual fund management. This complexity might create further administrative burdens, making consistent implementation challenging.
Conclusion
Overall, while S. 686 sets out a comprehensive financial framework to support the development of accessory dwelling units, there are notable concerns regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of its financial allocations and restrictions. Addressing these issues may be essential to maximize the intended benefits of this legislative proposal.
Issues
The bill allows a grantee to use not more than 20 percent of the funds for administrative costs (Section 2, subsection j). This percentage may be seen as high relative to the funds allocated for direct project costs, possibly resulting in an inefficient use of resources and taxpayer money.
The requirement that beneficiaries must earn not more than 150 percent of the area median income (Section 2, subsection e, 4(A)(iv)) could be too restrictive and might exclude applicants who still need assistance, limiting the bill's reach and effectiveness.
The provision requiring the owner to reside in either the single-family dwelling unit or one of the accessory dwelling units (Section 2, subsection e, 4(A)(i)) could hinder potential applicants by reducing flexibility in how the housing can be used.
The complexity of adjusting the $100,000 cap for inflation (Section 2, subsection b, 5) could pose a problem for consistent annual implementation, making management of funds confusing and potentially burdensome.
The penalty requiring recipients to repay grants if residency or ownership conditions are not met (Section 2, subsection e, 4(C)) might discourage applicants due to fear of future financial burdens from unintended non-compliance.
The extensive language detailing allowable and not allowable expenses for administrative costs (Section 2, subsection j) might be simplified to enhance clarity and understanding, thus reducing potential administrative burdens.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that the official title of the law is “The Farmhouse-to-Workforce Housing Act of 2025.”
2. Housing preservation grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Section 533 of the Housing Act of 1949 introduce limits on the use of housing preservation grants, such as funds for accessory dwelling units and conditions that owners must meet. The bill also outlines permissible and prohibited administrative costs, adjusts funding amounts for inflation, and authorizes funds to support these housing efforts.
Money References
- Section 533 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490m) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) though (7) as subparagraphs (A) through (G), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; (B) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by inserting “(1)” before “Preservation”; (C) in paragraph (1), as so designated— (i) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking “, except” and all that follows through “that structure”; (ii) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated, by striking “and” at the end; (iii) in subparagraph (G), as so redesignated, by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and (iv) by adding at the end the following: “(H) be used to provide loans or grants for accessory dwelling units.”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(2) Assistance under this section for single family housing— “(A) may only be provided with respect to housing that is not less than 25 years old, as of the date on which the occupancy permit for the housing is issued; and “(B) to an individual may not exceed $200,000.
- “(4) Assistance under this section for an accessory dwelling unit— “(A) may not cover more than 50 percent of the total cost of the accessory dwelling unit; and “(B) may not exceed $100,000 (as adjusted for inflation as described in paragraph (5)).
- In the case of any calendar year beginning after December 31, 2026, the $100,000 dollar amount described in paragraph (4)(B) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(ii) the percentage change in the price index amount determined by the Secretary of Labor to represent the percent change in the price index published for September of the preceding year over the price index published for the September of the year prior to the preceding year, adjusted to the nearest one-tenth of 1 percent.”; (2) in subsection (c)(1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “not more than $16,000,000 (as adjusted for inflation) of the” after “allocate”; and (B) in the flush text following subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following: “Any amounts appropriated for this section in a fiscal year over $16,000,000 shall be transferred to States that have committed to grantees all funds allocated to the State under this subsection.”; (3) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following: “(4)(A)
- If the owner of a single-family dwelling unit does not meet the requirements under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A), the owner shall return to the Secretary the full amount of assistance received under this section.”; and (4) by adding at the end the following: “(j) A recipient of assistance under this section may use not more than 20 percent of the funds for direct and indirect administrative costs related to projects carried out under this section, which— “(1) may include— “(A) payment of reasonable salaries or contracts for professional, technical, and clerical staff actively assisting in the delivery of the project; “(B) payment of necessary and reasonable office expenses such as office rental, supplies, utilities, telephone services, and equipment., with any item of nonexpendable personal property having a unit value of $1,000 or more, acquired with funds provided under this section specifically identified to the Secretary in writing; “(C) payment of necessary and reasonable administrative costs such as workers' compensation, liability insurance, and the employer's share of Social Security and health benefits, with payments to private retirement funds only permitted if the grantee already has such a fund established and ongoing; “(D) payment of reasonable fees for necessary training of grantee personnel; “(E) payment of necessary and reasonable costs for an audit upon expiration of the grant agreement; “(F) other reasonable travel and miscellaneous expenses necessary to accomplish the objectives of the specific grant which were anticipated in the individual grant proposal and have been approved as eligible expenses at the time of grant approval; and “(G) costs related to landlord education; and “(2) may not include— “(A) preparing housing development plans and strategies except as necessary to accomplish the specific objectives of the project; “(B) substitution of any financial support previously provided or currently available from any other source; “(C) reimbursing personnel to perform construction related to housing preservation assistance; “(D) buying property of any kind from persons receiving assistance from the grantee under the terms of the grant agreement; “(E) paying for or reimbursing the grantee for any expense or debts incurred before the Secretary executes the grant agreement; “(F) paying any debts, expenses, or costs which should be the responsibility of the individual homeowner, owner, tenant or household member of a rental property, or owner (member) or non-member of a co-op receiving assistance under this section outside the costs of repair and rehabilitation as well as for replacement housing (individual homeowners only); “(G) any type of political activities prohibited by the Office of Management and Budget Circular A–122, or any successor guidance; “(H) other costs including contributions and donations, entertainment, fines and penalties, interest and other financial costs unrelated to the assistance to be provided, legislative expenses, and any excess of cost from other grant agreements; or “(I) paying added salaries for employees paid by other sources.
- “(k) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $200,000,000 to carry out this section, to remain available until expended.