Overview
Title
To limit eligibility for Federal benefits for certain immigrants, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The America First Act wants to change who can get help from the government, like money for school or health care, depending on if they're allowed to live in the country. It tries to save money by giving less to some people and asks people to show more proof before getting help.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "America First Act," aims to limit eligibility for various federal benefits for certain immigrants in the United States. It proposes changes to existing laws to restrict access to public benefits, healthcare, housing assistance, and educational financial aid based on immigration status. The bill also seeks to impose stricter identification requirements for tax credits, reduce funding for sanctuary jurisdictions, and restrict federal funding to organizations that support specific non-citizens. Additionally, it outlines guidelines for verifying immigration status before granting federal benefits.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "America First Act," aims to restrict the eligibility of certain immigrants for various federal benefits. The legislation brings forth multiple amendments to existing laws, targeting specific immigrant categories, including those with temporary or protected statuses. This bill also establishes new eligibility requirements based on citizenship or lawful immigration status across several public welfare programs, healthcare benefits, education funding, and even tax credits.
General Summary
The bill is a comprehensive effort to redefine eligibility for federal benefits and services, focusing on immigration status as a determining factor. It covers a wide array of federal assistance programs, including health care, education funding, housing support, child nutrition various tax credits, and emergency services. Additionally, it specifically redefines benefits for certain immigrant groups such as refugees and those granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS) or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue raised by the bill is the narrowing of eligibility for federal assistance based on immigration status, which could be seen as exclusionary and potentially discriminatory. The legislation defines specific immigrant categories that would be excluded from benefits, such as those seeking asylum or holding protected statuses, thereby affecting a broad spectrum of immigrants.
Another notable concern is the 50% reduction in ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act) funding for "sanctuary jurisdictions," which are identified as entities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. This could disproportionately affect educational funding in those areas, raising questions about equity and potential legal challenges.
The bill also introduces restrictions on healthcare funding by disqualifying federally qualified health centers that serve non-lawfully present individuals from receiving certain federal funding. This could impact access to healthcare services, potentially posing public health risks and humanitarian concerns.
Moreover, specific sections of the bill, such as the exclusion of Haitian immigrants from refugee services while allowing such services for Cuban entrants, have been flagged as potentially discriminatory.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, this bill, if enacted, could potentially lead to decreased access to public services and benefits by immigrant populations, with possible public health repercussions due to reduced access to healthcare. Additionally, the restrictions in educational funding could affect the quality of education in jurisdictions labeled as sanctuary areas.
The changes to tax credits may introduce complexities for families attempting to navigate identification requirements and understand new eligibility criteria. Overall, these shifts could lead to broader social implications, including increased financial strain on already vulnerable immigrant families.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Immigrant Communities: Immigrant populations, particularly those with temporary or protected immigration statuses, stand to face significant challenges due to restricted access to crucial services like healthcare, housing, and education. The potential exclusion of Haitian refugees from support services underscores concerns regarding equitable treatment among immigrant groups.
Educational Institutions: Schools and educational agencies in sanctuary jurisdictions may experience funding cuts, thus affecting their ability to provide quality education and maintain necessary programs for students, including those from immigrant families.
Healthcare Providers: Federally qualified health centers could face funding limitations if they assist non-lawfully present immigrants, leading to possible cutbacks in services which might diminish their capacity to serve all patients.
Tax-Exempt Organizations: These entities may find new compliance requirements challenging, particularly regarding the restrictions on serving certain immigrant populations, which could affect their operational scope and influence their contributions to community support.
In essence, while the bill seeks to prioritize federal benefits for citizens and lawful residents, it raises significant ethical, humanitarian, and practical concerns about the ramifications for disparate populations and public welfare broadly.
Financial Assessment
The America First Act includes various financial references primarily focused on reallocating federal spending in relation to immigration status and modifying tax credit policies. Below is a detailed exploration of these financial aspects, linking them to identified issues in the bill.
Federal Benefits and Public Services
Sections of the bill propose limiting access to federal benefits like healthcare and housing based on immigration status. This change might reduce federal expenditures on these programs by excluding certain immigrant groups, potentially resulting in savings. However, it may also lead to increased administrative costs associated with verifying legal status before granting benefits, as noted in Section 11. The focus on enforcement and verification could introduce complex legal processes prone to error or inconsistency, impacting the efficacy and fairness of the allocation process.
Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit
The bill revises the Child Tax Credit, raising the base credit from $1,000 to $2,000. It establishes income thresholds of $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for others before phase-out, indicating targeted relief for middle to higher-income families. The legislation also imposes more stringent identification requirements for earning these credits. These measures could challenge compliance and may reduce accessibility, especially for households with mixed immigration statuses, as highlighted in Section 6.
Reduction of ESEA Funding for Sanctuary Jurisdictions
A notable financial component is the reduction of 50% in educational funding for identified sanctuary jurisdictions (Section 9). This is portrayed as a financial deterrent against policies perceived as non-cooperative with federal immigration law. While intended as a punitive measure, such reallocation could exacerbate educational inequities, impacting public education in these areas. As funding would be redistributed to non-sanctuary areas, this could shift significant financial resources away from communities maintaining sanctuary policies.
Prohibition on Federal Funding for Certain Services
The bill restricts federal funding to agencies and organizations that provide services to non-lawfully present immigrants. This restriction includes federally qualified health centers and recipients of Community Development Block Grant funds (Sections 4 and 13). Eliminating these funds to particular service providers may reduce public expenditure but could increase social costs indirectly. The lack of support for immigrant communities might pressure local resources and programs, particularly in areas heavily reliant on federal funding to serve vulnerable populations.
Exclusion of Haitian Immigrants from Refugee Services
The text specifically excludes Haitian immigrants from services previously available to them, impacting federal spending designated for refugee resettlement (Section 10). This decision reflects a shift in how federal resources are allocated across immigrant communities. The lack of financial support could disadvantage certain immigrant groups disproportionately, potentially raising questions about equity and bias in federal spending decisions.
Through these financial modifications, the bill attempts to prioritize resource distribution aligning with its broader immigration reform goals. However, these changes may lead to essential services being underfunded or misallocated and potentially raise legal and ethical issues surrounding equitable access to public resources. The reallocation of funds and adjustments to financial policies require careful consideration to avoid exacerbating disparities within immigrant and low-income communities.
Issues
The bill significantly narrows the eligibility for federal benefits and public services based on immigration status, which could be seen as discriminatory or raise ethical concerns, particularly affecting vulnerable immigrant populations (Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 12).
The reduction of ESEA funding for 'sanctuary jurisdictions' by 50% could disproportionately affect educational agencies in those areas, potentially leading to significant educational inequities and legal challenges (Section 9).
The prohibition on federal funding for Federally qualified health centers providing services to non-lawfully present individuals could restrict access to necessary healthcare services for immigrants, raising concerns about public health implications and humanitarian obligations (Section 4).
The restriction on Community Development Block Grant funds and other federal funding based on immigration status may lead to disputes and is seen as potentially discriminatory, impacting organizations that serve needy communities, including legal immigrants (Section 13).
The exclusion of Haitian immigrants from receiving refugee resettlement services, while continuing to allow such services for Cuban immigrants, could be interpreted as discriminatory or lacking justification, potentially harming Haiti's immigrant community (Section 10).
Verification of citizenship requirements for programs like WIC and school meals could increase administrative burdens and create barriers to access for children in need, which raises concerns about equity and implementation feasibility (Section 12).
The change in terminology and processes regarding immigration status verification involves complex legal shifts that may confuse agencies and the public, potentially leading to inconsistent implementation (Section 11).
The complex adjustments to child tax credit and earned income tax credit identification requirements may introduce compliance challenges for taxpayers and the IRS, affecting low-income families (Section 6).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the Act introduces the "America First Act" and outlines the topics covered, including eligibility for federal benefits, citizenship verification for various programs, limitations on refugee resettlement, and restrictions on funding for certain jurisdictions and organizations.
2. Adjusting eligibility of certain non-citizens for Federal public benefits under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, reducing the types of federal benefits that certain non-citizens can receive and narrowing the definition of a "qualified alien." It also removes specific categories of individuals, such as those paroled into the U.S. for less than a year, from being eligible for certain benefits.
3. Verification of citizenship by Head Start agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Head Start Act states that a child is not eligible for a Head Start program if they are not a U.S. citizen or a refugee and if their parent is unlawfully present in the U.S. or falls under certain immigration categories such as being granted asylum or temporary protected status. A related amendment removes the term "immigrant" from another section of the Act.
4. Eligibility for certain Federal health care benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of a U.S. bill places restrictions on access to federal health care benefits like Medicaid, Medicare, and subsidies under the Affordable Care Act for certain groups including parolees, those with deferred action, asylum recipients, temporary protected status holders, and individuals granted withholding of removal. It also prohibits federal funding to health centers that serve people not lawfully present in the United States, except for emergency care.
1899C. Limiting Medicare coverage of parolees and TPS and DACA recipients Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Medicare coverage is limited for individuals who are parolees, recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) or Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and others with similar immigration statuses. This means these individuals are not eligible to enroll in or receive Medicare benefits.
5. Housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends various housing-related laws to restrict financial assistance for certain non-citizens, specify eligibility for single-family housing loans, prohibit the issuance of eligibility guidelines for these programs, and exclude housing assistance from other programs. It also updates the criteria for who qualifies as a "disqualified individual" for low-income housing credit eligibility, focusing on the immigration status of occupants.
6. Identification requirements for child tax credit and earned income tax credit; permanent extension of certain temporary rules for child tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends the tax code to increase the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and sets identification requirements, like requiring a social security number, for claiming child tax or earned income tax credits. It also establishes qualifications about citizenship or lawful presence to claim these credits, and specifies that these changes apply to tax years starting after December 31, 2024.
Money References
- (a) Child tax credit.—Section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking “$1,000” and inserting “$2,000”, (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraphs (A) through (C) and inserting the following: “(A) $400,000 in the case of a joint return, and “(B) $200,000 in any other case.”, (3) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking “$3,000” and inserting “$2,500”, and (B) by adding at the end the following: “(4) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF REFUNDABLE CREDIT.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount determined under paragraph (1)(A) with respect to any qualifying child shall not exceed $1,700, and such paragraph shall be applied without regard to subsection (h).
- “(B) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.— “(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a taxable year beginning after 2024, the $1,700 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(I) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(II) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting ‘2023’ for ‘2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- “(ii) ROUNDING.—If any increase under this subparagraph is not a multiple of $100, such increase shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $100.”, (4) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: “(e) Additional requirements.— “(1) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—No credit shall be allowed under this section to a taxpayer who does not include on the return of tax for the taxable year— “(A) the social security number of the taxpayer (and, in the case of a joint return, the social security number of the taxpayer's spouse), “(B) with respect to any qualifying child, the name and the social security number of such qualifying child, and “(C) for purposes of subsection (h), with respect to any dependent of the taxpayer, the name and the social security number of such dependent.
- “(B) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements described in this subparagraph are that the individual— “(i) shall be a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States, and “(ii) may not be— “(I) an alien granted asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), “(II) an alien granted parole under section 212(d)(5) or 236(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5), 1126(a)(2)(B)), “(III) an alien granted temporary protected status under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1254a), “(IV) an alien granted withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)), “(V) any nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)), “(VI) any alien granted deferred action or deferred enforced departure, including pursuant to the memorandum of the Department of Homeland Security entitled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children’ issued on June 15, 2012, or “(VII) an alien who has been issued an employment-based immigrant visa described in section 203(b) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)).”, and (5) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following: “(h) Partial credit allowed for certain other dependents.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The credit determined under subsection (a) shall be increased by $500 for each dependent of the taxpayer (as defined in section 152) other than a qualifying child described in subsection (c).
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency prohibitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from spending its funds on certain activities, such as sheltering by non-federal entities for overcrowded migrant facilities, supporting the emergency food and shelter program for people encountered by Homeland Security, and providing assistance to individuals in the U.S. without legal status or various forms of temporary immigration relief.
8. Eligibility for postsecondary financial assistance based on immigration status Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In an amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965, eligibility for postsecondary financial aid now requires applicants to be U.S. citizens, nationals, or permanent residents.
9. Reducing ESEA funding for sanctuary jurisdictions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary of Education to cut education funding by 50% to states or political subdivisions identified as "sanctuary jurisdictions," which are areas that prevent law enforcement from enforcing federal immigration laws. The withheld funds will be redistributed to areas that do not have sanctuary status.
8549D. Funding reductions for Sanctuary jurisdictions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how federal funding will be reduced by 50% for states or local areas deemed "sanctuary jurisdictions," which are places that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The withheld funds will be given to other states or local entities that comply with federal immigration laws.
10. Limitation on refugee resettlement and other services for certain Haitian immigrants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing laws to exclude Haitian immigrants from the benefits given to "Cuban and Haitian entrants," limiting these benefits to only Cuban entrants in various provisions, including the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980 and the Social Security Act.
11. Prohibiting participation in Federal benefit programs until a satisfactory immigration status is verified Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes changes to the Social Security Act to ensure that federal benefits are only provided to individuals after verifying their satisfactory immigration status through the Department of Homeland Security, instead of the old Immigration and Naturalization Service. It specifies that benefits cannot be given until evidence of legal immigration status is confirmed, allowing a limited time for individuals to prove their status.
12. Verification of citizenship for WIC and school meals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines new rules for the WIC program and school meal eligibility, stating that a child must be a U.S. citizen or a refugee to qualify. Additionally, the child's parent must not be unlawfully present in the U.S., although exceptions are made for certain types of legal immigration status like asylum or temporary protected status.
13. Restrictions on use of Community Development Block Grant funds and Federal funding by tax-exempt organizations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and other federal funding by tax-exempt organizations to provide monetary support or services to certain non-citizen individuals, including those unlawfully present, granted parole, temporary protected status, deferred action, or withholding of removal in the United States. The restriction for tax-exempt organizations will apply to tax years starting after December 31, 2024.
14. Implementing regulations and guidance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The head of each relevant government agency is required to create rules and provide guidance to ensure the implementation of this Act and its amendments.