Overview
Title
To modify a provision supporting the execution of bilateral agreements concerning illicit transnational maritime activity and to authorize the President to impose sanctions with respect to illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing and the sale, supply, purchase, or transfer of endangered species, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
In the bill S. 5552, the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2024," the United States wants to stop bad fishing and protect sea animals by making rules that can punish people or countries, especially focusing on China, if they do wrong things in the ocean or harm sea creatures. It also asks for countries to work together and for the President to tell Congress what's happening.
Summary AI
The bill S. 5552, titled the “Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2024,” aims to support the enforcement of bilateral agreements related to stopping illegal maritime activities and allows the President to impose sanctions on those involved in illegal fishing and the trade of endangered species. It encourages international cooperation, particularly targeting harmful fishing practices by entities, with a significant focus on actions by the People's Republic of China. The bill outlines sanctions, such as blocking property transactions and banning entry to the United States, and requires regular updates to Congress on these activities. Additionally, it involves efforts to evaluate and improve global responses to illegal fishing and the threat it poses to marine life.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2024," outlines measures to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing and the illegal trade in endangered species. The bill authorizes the U.S. government to impose sanctions on foreign individuals and vessels involved in these activities. Furthermore, it emphasizes international cooperation to tackle IUU fishing, particularly highlighting the actions of the People's Republic of China. The bill seeks to modify existing agreements related to illicit maritime activities and mandates regular reporting on efforts to address global IUU fishing.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues identified in the bill is the emphasis on the People's Republic of China regarding IUU fishing activities. This focus could imply a specific geopolitical stance that may affect international relations, especially with China. Additionally, the President is granted broad authority to impose sanctions, raising potential concerns about the lack of checks and balances or oversight on such executive powers.
The definitions section incorporates terms from other acts, which could create interpretation challenges if these definitions change over time. The sanctions process in the bill is wide-ranging and could inadvertently affect entities not directly involved in illegal activities, leading to possible unintended economic consequences.
There is also a lack of clarity and measurable objectives in the section directing reports and briefings on efforts against illegal fishing. The humanitarian exception section is complicated by exclusions that are difficult to enforce, particularly in differentiating legally sourced commodities from illegal ones.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill's impact on the broader public revolves around its aim to protect global marine biodiversity by addressing IUU fishing and related illegal activities. The legislation might bolster maritime law enforcement and encourage international collaboration, which could improve the sustainability of fish stocks and marine ecosystems.
However, economic repercussions could emerge if sanctions impact trade or international relations. Supply chain disruptions might occur if entities with tenuous links to illegal activities face unintended sanctions, affecting industries reliant on marine resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
International Relations: The bill's emphasis on China's fishing practices might lead to diplomatic tensions. It reflects a broader strategy of holding individual countries accountable, which could reshape international maritime policies and cooperation.
Economic Entities: Companies involved in the international fish trade and maritime activities might face increased scrutiny and potential sanctions. Clear guidelines and effective communication will be essential to prevent businesses from being unfairly penalized.
Environmental Organizations: The bill aligns with the goals of environmental activists and organizations promoting sustainable fishing practices. It could increase resources and political support for initiatives combating illegal fishing and protecting endangered species.
Government Agencies: The Department of State and Department of Defense are tasked with implementing the bill's provisions. They are required to provide regular updates and reports to Congress, which could demand additional resources and coordination efforts.
Overall, while the Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2024 aims to address critical environmental and biodiversity issues, it presents several challenges and opportunities, reflecting the complexities of governing international maritime activities and balancing economic, diplomatic, and environmental priorities.
Issues
There is a potential for significant geopolitical implications due to the emphasis on illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing by the People's Republic of China, as mentioned in Section 3. The bill may be seen as targeting a specific country, which could impact international relations.
The broad authority granted to the President to impose sanctions in Section 5 lacks specificity in checks and balances or oversight. This could lead to potential misuse or overreach of executive power, raising legal and ethical concerns.
Section 2 contains definitions that incorporate terms from other Acts (e.g., the Immigration and Nationality Act) and could lead to interpretative challenges if those Acts are updated without corresponding changes in this bill.
The sanctions process described in Section 5 is quite wide-ranging and can affect entities only tangentially related to illegal activities, potentially leading to unintended consequences for businesses and economic entities.
There is a lack of clarity and specificity in Section 6 concerning the measurable objectives and performance indicators for the briefing and reporting efforts on global illegal fishing, raising concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of these initiatives.
The humanitarian exception in Section 5 for sanctioned entities is complicated by exclusions that are difficult to enforce, particularly in distinguishing legally from illegally sourced commodities.
The section concerning international collaboration (Section 3) lacks detailed guidelines on the roles and responsibilities of the United States Permanent Representative to the UN, which may lead to implementation challenges.
The modification of support for bilateral agreements as mentioned in Section 4 lacks context on the impact of removing specificity regarding 'in Africa' and 'African', creating ambiguity on the scope and impact of the agreements.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill specifies that it can be referred to as the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2024."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including what is meant by "admission", "alien", and "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" as per the Immigration and Nationality Act, as well as the congressional committees involved in Armed Services and Foreign Affairs. It also defines a "foreign person" as someone or an entity that isn't a U.S. person, "illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing" based on regulations under fishing laws, and explains that a "United States person" includes U.S. citizens, certain legal entities, and anyone located in the U.S.
3. International collaboration related to countering illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the United States' policy to work with other countries and international organizations to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing. It mandates the Secretary of State to utilize the country's influence in international settings to promote technology use for maritime law enforcement and to hold those responsible for such harmful fishing practices accountable, with an emphasis on addressing the actions of the People's Republic of China. Additionally, the President can direct the UN representative to encourage the UN to take more significant steps in supporting global efforts against these fishing activities.
4. Modification of support for execution of bilateral agreements concerning illicit transnational maritime activity Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 by removing specific references to "Africa" and "African" in its provisions concerning illicit transnational maritime activities.
5. Authorization of imposition of sanctions with respect to illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing and trade in endangered species Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines a U.S. law that allows the President to place sanctions on foreign individuals or vessels involved in illegal fishing or endangered species trade. These sanctions can include blocking property, denying entry into the U.S., and restricting financial transactions unless it's against U.S. interests or conflicts with international agreements.
6. Briefing and report on global illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State, with help from the Secretary of Defense, to give a detailed update to Congress about efforts to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing with partners and through international means. Moreover, it mandates a yearly report for five years, providing recommendations and assessments related to fishing activities by China and the effectiveness of global cooperation forums.