Overview
Title
To authorize the conveyance by the Secretary of the Army of certain property located at Fort Bliss, Texas, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets the Army give a piece of land in Texas to El Paso Water so they can use it to help with floods. In return, El Paso Water will pay for the land, either with money or by doing helpful things like providing water services.
Summary AI
S. 5529 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to transfer a parcel of land at Fort Bliss, Texas, to El Paso Water. This land includes the Kay Bailey Hutchison Desalination Plant and additional acreage, and it is intended for use in stormwater flood control. El Paso Water will compensate by paying fair market value, which can be in cash, in-kind services, or both. The transfer includes terms for continued use of existing easements and a reversion clause if the land is not used as intended.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed bill, introduced in the Senate, seeks to authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey a parcel of land at Fort Bliss, Texas, to El Paso Water. This land transfer involves approximately 65.3 acres, including the Kay Bailey Hutchison Desalination Plant and adjoining land, for the purpose of stormwater flood control. El Paso Water is required to pay the fair market value and cover most related costs, and the bill outlines various conditions under which this land conveyance would occur.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several noteworthy issues:
Valuation Concerns: The determination of the land's fair market value lies solely with the Secretary, which may lead to potential undervaluation or overvaluation unless properly audited.
In-Kind Consideration Ambiguities: While the bill allows for in-kind consideration, such as water services, there are no clear guidelines on how these non-cash payments are valued in comparison to monetary payments, leading to possible imbalances or disputes.
Property Reversion Criteria: The provision allows the property to revert to the United States if not used as intended, but lacks specific criteria for such a decision, potentially resulting in unjust reversions due to subjective interpretations.
Broad Authority for Additional Terms: The Secretary is granted extensive authority to add terms and conditions, which, without specific parameters, might be applied to benefit certain parties disproportionately.
Conflict Over Conveyance Costs: There is no outlined mechanism to resolve disputes over the costs incurred versus the amounts collected from El Paso Water, opening opportunities for financial mismatches.
Federal Funds Restriction Oversight: The bill prohibits the use of federal funds by El Paso Water for the transaction costs, yet lacks monitoring measures to ensure adherence, posing a risk of non-compliance.
Impact on the Public
The conveyance of land for stormwater control could lead to enhanced flood management, benefiting the general public in El Paso and surrounding areas by potentially reducing flood risk. However, without proper valuation and clear exchange terms, public trust might erode due to perceived or real financial discrepancies, particularly if the transaction is seen as inequitable.
Impact on Stakeholders
El Paso Water: This utility stands to benefit from acquiring land critical for water management. However, the financial implications of covering costs and possible undervaluation issues could pose challenges.
United States Army: The conveyance eliminates responsibility for maintaining this parcel, freeing resources while also leveraging assets for community benefits.
Local Community: Residents may experience improved flood mitigation, but could be concerned about the broader economic and environmental implications if the transaction is not transparent or equitable.
In summary, the proposed bill presents an opportunity to address significant public utility needs in El Paso but requires careful consideration of valuation, exchange terms, and oversight to ensure fairness and transparency for all parties involved.
Issues
The potential for undervaluation or overvaluation of the property due to its value being determined solely by the Secretary (Section b, Paragraph 1), which could lead to financial discrepancies and lack of transparency in the transaction.
The lack of clear definition for in-kind consideration (Section b, Paragraph 2) presents a risk of unequal exchanges where the value of non-cash payments in terms of water services is not clearly delineated.
The clause allowing reversion of property rights to the U.S. based on the Secretary's determination (Section c, Paragraph 1) lacks specific criteria, creating ambiguity and potential for unfair seizure of the property if misinterpreted.
The broad authority granted to the Secretary to add terms and conditions (Section g) could be utilized in an arbitrary manner, potentially favoring certain parties over others unless boundaries and criteria are established.
The absence of a mechanism to resolve disputes related to conveyance costs (Section d, Paragraph 2) leaves room for disagreements and potential financial mishandlings if the costs incurred do not match the amounts collected from El Paso Water.
While the restriction on using Federal funds for the costs paid by El Paso Water (Section e) is reasonable, the lack of oversight mechanisms may lead to compliance circumvention.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Land conveyance, Fort Bliss, El Paso, Texas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Army is authorized to transfer approximately 65.3 acres of land at Fort Bliss, Texas, to El Paso Water for stormwater flood control, with conditions that El Paso Water must pay the fair market value and cover most transfer costs. If the land isn't used as intended, it might be returned to the United States, and El Paso Water cannot use federal funds to pay for these costs.