Overview
Title
To provide for civil monetary penalties for violations of mental health parity requirements.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that people get the same care for their mental health as they do for their physical health by charging money if companies don't follow the rules. It also wants to make sure everyone involved, like health plans and service helpers, play fair and follow the rules.
Summary AI
The bill S. 5524, titled the "Parity Enforcement Act of 2024," aims to impose civil monetary penalties on entities that violate mental health parity requirements in the United States. It modifies existing laws such as the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and the Internal Revenue Code to hold not only health plans and insurers accountable but also plan sponsors and service providers like third-party administrators if they contribute to violations. The Secretary is granted the discretion to determine how the liability is divided among involved parties. This legislation is intended to ensure that mental health benefits are on par with physical health benefits and would take effect a year after enactment for applicable plan years.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Parity Enforcement Act of 2024," introduced in the U.S. Senate, aims to impose civil monetary penalties for violations of mental health parity requirements. This means it seeks to ensure that mental health and substance use disorder benefits are treated equally to medical and surgical benefits in health insurance plans.
General Summary of the Bill
The primary goal of this legislation is to hold not only the health plans and insurers but also service providers accountable for violations of mental health parity laws. The bill adds amendments to existing laws, such as the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and the Internal Revenue Code, to include new requirements for liability and enforcement against violations. These amendments specify that service providers like third-party administrators, managed behavioral health organizations, and pharmacy benefit managers can be held liable for contributing to such violations. Additionally, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is granted the discretion to determine the percentage of liability shared among different entities involved in the insurance coverage.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant issues identified in this bill is the complexity of the legal language used, which might be difficult for a layperson to interpret. This complexity could lead to ambiguity in understanding the rights and responsibilities of the involved parties. Another point of concern is the discretion given to the Secretary to determine liability percentages without providing clear guidelines. This might result in inconsistent enforcement and potentially arbitrary or biased decisions. Furthermore, the bill does not address how disputes over these determinations will be handled, potentially creating legal uncertainties.
An additional issue is the lack of a precise timeline for when these changes will take effect, outside of the application to plan years beginning one year post-enactment. Without a clearly specified enactment date, confusion may arise regarding compliance obligations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill attempts to strengthen the enforcement of mental health parity laws, promoting fair treatment and access to mental health care services. By expanding the range of entities held accountable for violations, it seeks to encourage more comprehensive adherence to mental health parity standards across the health insurance industry. This could lead to improved mental health care access and quality for the public.
Impact on Stakeholders
Positive Impact:
Consumers/Patients: Individuals with mental health and substance use disorders stand to benefit from strengthened parity enforcement, which may lead to more equitable treatment and coverage of their healthcare needs. This could result in reduced out-of-pocket costs and improved access to necessary services.
Advocacy Groups: Organizations advocating for mental health parity may view this bill as a positive step forward in holding more entities accountable and potentially decreasing systemic barriers to mental health care.
Negative Impact:
Service Providers: Entities such as third-party administrators and pharmacy benefit managers might face increased scrutiny and potential liability. This could lead to operational changes and increased costs associated with compliance efforts.
Employer Plan Sponsors: Employers who sponsor health plans may incur additional regulatory responsibilities and potential liabilities, impacting how they design and offer health benefit plans to employees.
In conclusion, while the bill appears to advance the cause of mental health equality in insurance coverage, careful consideration and clarification are needed regarding its enforcement mechanisms and the discretion elements, to ensure it achieves its intended goals without unintended adverse effects on specific stakeholders.
Issues
The section on liability and enforcement (Section 2) contains complex legal language that may be difficult for non-experts to understand, leading to ambiguity in interpretation. This can result in confusion about the enforcement and the rights of the parties involved.
The discretion given to the Secretary to determine liability percentages among the plan, issuer, sponsor, and service provider (Section 2) could create inconsistent enforcement, potentially favoring certain entities over others. Without clear criteria, this could lead to arbitrary decision-making.
The bill lacks clear guidelines or criteria for how the Secretary will determine the liability percentages (Section 2), which could lead to arbitrary or biased decisions.
The bill does not specify how disputes regarding liability determinations made by the Secretary will be resolved (Section 2). This omission could create legal uncertainties and challenges for involved parties, potentially leading to protracted litigation.
The effective date of the amendments made by this section is based on the enactment date of the Act, with a one-year delay (Section 2). This could lead to confusion without a specified timeline or a clear method for tracking the enactment date.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be officially referred to as the "Parity Enforcement Act of 2024."
2. Liability for, enforcement of, and civil monetary penalties for parity violations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill introduces service provider liability for violations of mental health and substance use disorder parity in group health plans, meaning that service providers like third-party administrators can be held accountable. It also outlines how penalties and enforcement responsibilities are divided among health plans, insurers, sponsors, and service providers, with the Secretary having discretion to determine liability, and specifies that these changes will take effect for plan years beginning one year after the bill's enactment.