Overview

Title

To amend chapter 423 of title 49, United States Code, to prohibit air carriers from paying ancillary fee incentives and discriminating on the basis of a covered characteristic in charging or setting fares or ancillary fees, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "End Airline Extortion Act" is a rule that wants to stop airlines from paying workers extra money for charging passengers extra fees for things like picking seats or bringing bags, and make sure they don't charge different prices based on things like if someone is disabled or has a family. It also says that airlines can let kids fly for free or with a discount without getting in trouble.

Summary AI

The bill, titled the “End Airline Extortion Act”, seeks to amend chapter 423 of title 49 of the United States Code. It aims to prevent air carriers from incentivizing employees for charging additional fees related to services like baggage and seating. Additionally, it prohibits discrimination based on characteristics such as disability status and familial status when setting fares and fees. The bill also clarifies that air carriers are not liable for allowing minor children to fly for free or at a reduced rate.

Published

2024-12-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2024-12-10
Package ID: BILLS-118s5470is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
670
Pages:
4
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 208
Verbs: 64
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 21
Entities: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.33
Average Sentence Length:
41.88
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
23.45

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, officially titled the "End Airline Extortion Act," aims to modify existing laws by amending chapter 423 of title 49, United States Code. This bill seeks to eliminate certain unfair practices by air carriers, specifically prohibiting them from compensating employees, contractors, or others linked to the issuer of "ancillary fees"—additional charges for services like luggage and seating. Furthermore, it seeks to prohibit discriminatory pricing based on specific personal characteristics like disability or family status. This bill's introduction reflects growing concerns over transparency and fairness in airline pricing.

Summary of Significant Issues

This legislation raises several important issues and questions regarding its implementability and interpretation: - Ambiguity in Definitions: The term "covered characteristic" is not explicitly detailed in the bill, instead referring readers to another section of U.S. law. This lack of clarity might result in difficulties understanding which types of discrimination are prohibited, potentially weakening the law's effectiveness. - Enforcement Challenges: The bill does not clearly articulate how its provisions will be enforced or what penalties apply for non-compliance. This gap may render the bill less effective as airlines could exploit loopholes or find indirect methods to continue problematic practices. - Broad Definitions: The term "add-on service," as potentially modifiable through the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation, might lead to inconsistent application or interpretation of what constitutes an ancillary fee. - Limited Exceptions: The Rule of Construction mentions exceptions for minor children’s fare policies but does not specify beyond that, which could result in unforeseen or broader interpretations affecting more passenger categories.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, this legislation aims to protect passengers from unfair airline charges and discriminatory pricing practices, a move that could resonate positively with the general public tired of escalating and opaque airline fees. By targeting the incentive structure behind these fees, the bill proposes a shift toward more transparent pricing models and equitable treatment of passengers. However, its success depends significantly on the bill’s clarity and the enforceability of its provisions. Should airlines find ways to circumvent these prohibitions, the legislation's intended benefits could be diminished.

Potential Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Passengers: If effectively enforced, passengers could experience fairer pricing and less confusion when booking flights, improving their overall travel experience. However, ambiguity in the definition of discrimination and lack of detailed mechanisms for enforcement might limit actual changes in passenger experiences.
  • Airlines: Airlines may face operational challenges adapting to these new requirements, especially if loopholes in enforcement are not addressed. This could bring regulatory compliance costs, yet could ultimately lead to stronger customer trust and satisfaction.
  • Airline Employees and Contractors: The restrictions against incentivizing fee collection may impact how airlines evaluate employee performance, potentially affecting compensation structures. This change could be viewed positively, emphasizing customer service over revenue generation.
  • Regulatory Bodies: The implementation and consistent enforcement of the bill's provisions will require significant oversight and clarifications from relevant authorities, such as the Department of Transportation, potentially increasing their workload and responsibilities.

In summary, while the "End Airline Extortion Act" presents an ambitious effort to enhance fairness in airline pricing, the ultimate impact on the public and specific stakeholders relies heavily on effective legislations that address current ambiguities and enforcement gaps. Such refinements are essential to ensure that the bill's intentions translate into tangible improvements within the airline industry.

Issues

  • The definition of 'covered characteristic' in Section 2 and Section 42309 references section 40127(a) of title 49, United States Code, without listing the characteristics, potentially leading to ambiguity and requiring readers to consult additional documents to fully understand prohibited discriminations. This lack of clarity could undermine the effectiveness and enforceability of the legislation.

  • Both Section 2 and Section 42309 introduce a prohibition against providing incentives for fees tied to ancillary services, yet the bill lacks specificity regarding enforcement mechanisms or penalties for violations. This absence may lead to challenges in enforcing the bill's provisions and leave room for potential loopholes or circumvention by airline carriers.

  • The term 'add-on service' in Section 42309 is defined broadly to include 'any other service determined appropriate by the Secretary,' granting the Secretary of Transportation significant discretion. This could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent application of the law.

  • There is a potential loophole in the enforcement of the ancillary fee incentives prohibition, as highlighted in Section 2 and Section 42309, where airlines might find indirect ways to incentivize employees or contractors unless further clarified. This could weaken the bill's goal of preventing unfair fee practices.

  • The Rule of Construction in Section 2 seems to provide a limited exception regarding fare policies for minor children but does not specify broader scenarios, which might lead to unintended interpretations or applications beyond the intended exceptions for minors.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states the official short title of the act as the "End Airline Extortion Act".

2. Prohibitions relating to payment of ancillary fee incentives and discriminating on the basis of a covered characteristic Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill adds a new rule that prevents airlines from offering extra payments or benefits to employees for charging passengers additional fees for things like baggage or seating as a condition for boarding a flight. It also prohibits discrimination in setting fares or fees based on characteristics like disability or family status and clarifies that free or reduced fares for children are not considered a violation of this rule.

42309. Prohibitions relating to payment of ancillary fee incentives and discriminating on the basis of a covered characteristic Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Airlines are not allowed to give bonuses to their workers for making passengers pay extra fees for things like baggage or seats. They also can't charge people different prices based on personal traits like having a disability or family status.