Overview
Title
To allow Federal funds appropriated for kindergarten through grade 12 education to follow the student.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to let money given by the government for school follow kids wherever they go to learn, like at regular schools, private schools, or even at home, so that all kids can have the same help. It makes sure that kids can use this money for different school things, but it won't change their school lunches or how private schools do things.
Summary AI
The bill, S. 5458, seeks to ensure that federal funding for education can follow students irrespective of whether they attend public, private, or home schools. It amends existing education laws to allow state educational agencies to allocate grants that follow students and can be used for expenses like tuition, curriculum materials, and educational activities. The bill applies to all students from kindergarten to grade 12, as well as students with disabilities, and aims to ensure equitable funding across different forms of schooling by creating education savings accounts for eligible students. It also explicitly states that it will not affect federally funded school lunch programs or impose control over private education providers.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, known as the "Support Children Having Open Opportunities for Learning Act of 2024" or the "SCHOOL Act of 2024," proposes to allow federal funds for kindergarten through grade 12 education to follow students rather than being allocated solely to public schools. This means that the funds could be used for students attending public, private, or home schools. By amending the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the bill aims to provide educational financial support directly to students, giving their families the flexibility to choose the type of education that best suits their needs.
The funds, which are meant to follow each student, can cover a range of educational expenses, including curriculum materials, technological tools, private tuition, and educational therapies, among others. An important aspect of the bill is the creation of education savings accounts to facilitate these allocations, ensuring they supplement existing educational funding without supplanting it.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue with this bill is the potential diversion of public funds from public schools to private and home schools. This could weaken the resources available to public education, particularly in underfunded areas. Another concern is the clear definition and oversight of "education savings accounts," as the bill lacks detailed guidelines on managing and monitoring these accounts, raising potential for misuse.
The bill's definition of "eligible child" as those aged 5 to 17 could inadvertently exclude older students who may still be in need of support for K-12 education. Furthermore, the wide array of allowable uses for funds, such as extracurricular activities, could lead to non-essential spending, which necessitates more robust accountability measures.
The variability in state definitions of home schooling could result in inconsistent implementation of the bill across the country. Additionally, the rule against federal or state control over non-public education providers could limit necessary oversight to maintain educational standards.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could significantly impact how education funding is distributed in the United States. For families, it provides the flexibility to choose from a wider array of educational options without financial constraints, empowering parents to make decisions based on their children's specific needs. This financial support directly following the student can create more personalized educational experiences, potentially increasing satisfaction and outcomes.
However, the redirection of funds away from public schools might undermine the ability of these institutions to provide quality education due to reduced funding. Public schools, often the default option for students from low-income families, might face challenges maintaining the same level of services, potentially exacerbating inequities in education.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For students and parents, particularly those interested in private or home schooling, the bill offers increased access and financial flexibility. It supports the growing demand for choice in education, allowing families to tailor education according to personal values, academic goals, or specialized needs.
On the other hand, public school systems might experience financial limitations, affecting staff salaries, curricular upgrades, and overall school maintenance. This outcome could lead to a divide where students who remain in public schools receive fewer resources compared to those attending private or home schools.
Private schools and educational service providers could see an influx of students and funds, which might support innovating and expanding their offerings. However, this shift could drive prices up, potentially making such options less accessible to lower-income families without sufficient funding adjustments.
Lastly, educational administrators and policymakers might face challenges in implementing and monitoring this new funding model, balancing fairness, transparency, and accountability amidst disparate state laws and definitions. This complexity necessitates careful consideration and, potentially, further legislative refinement to ensure the successful implementation of these changes in the educational landscape.
Issues
The provision allowing funds to follow students to private and home schools in Section 2 may lead to the diversion of public funds from public schools, potentially undermining public education resources.
The definition of 'eligible child' in Sections 2 and 8701 as only those aged 5 to 17 may exclude older students who still require K-12 educational resources, creating potential inequity.
The lack of specific guidelines and definitions for 'education savings accounts' across Sections 2, 8701, 3, and 610A introduces the risk of misuse or lack of oversight in managing these accounts.
The wide range of allowable uses for funds, such as extracurricular activities outlined in Sections 2 and 8701, might result in funds being spent on non-essential educational purposes, leading to concerns about accountability and wasteful spending.
Section 2 and 8701's mechanisms for calculating and distributing funds based on eligible children in private and home schools are not clearly defined, which could result in ambiguity and inequitable fund allocation.
The reliance on state definitions of 'home school' in Sections 2 and 8701 could lead to inconsistencies in fund allocation across different states, impacting educational equity.
The rule of construction detailed in Sections 2 and 3, restricting federal or state control over non-public education providers, is vague and might limit necessary oversight to ensure educational standards.
There is no accountability mechanism mentioned across Sections 2, 3, 8701, and 610A for monitoring the use of funds by private or home schools, raising concerns about potential misuse.
The plan requiring annual notification for school attendance in Sections 2 and 3 may place an unnecessary administrative burden on parents and educational agencies, potentially complicating the process without clear benefits.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 1, the Act is given its short title: the “Support Children Having Open Opportunities for Learning Act of 2024” or the “SCHOOL Act of 2024.”
2. Federal funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to follow the student Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill states that federal education funds under certain titles will follow each student to their chosen school, whether it's a public, private, or home school. It outlines processes for funding allocation, eligible uses of funds including educational materials and services, and ensures that these funds are supplementary and do not replace State funding.
8701. Funds to follow the student Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes that educational funds should follow students to the school they attend, whether it's public, private, or at home. It ensures that eligible children ages 5 to 17 can receive financial support for various educational expenses through direct allocations or education savings accounts, without allowing federal or state control over non-public education providers.
3. Federal funding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to follow the student Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes that federal funding for students with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act should follow eligible students to whichever public, private, or home school they attend. It specifies how funds can be used, requires states to develop plans to allocate funds, and ensures that these funds supplement rather than replace existing funding. It also clarifies that these provisions do not interfere with non-public education providers or federally funded school lunch programs.
610A. Funds to follow the student Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a policy where educational funding will follow students, including those with disabilities, ensuring they receive financial support regardless of whether they attend public, private, or home schools. It establishes a system for allocation and use of funds, requiring states to create a plan for fund distribution, while prohibiting federal or state control over private education providers and ensuring participation in federally funded school lunch programs.