Overview
Title
To amend title 11, United States Code, to improve protections for employees and retirees in business bankruptcies.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a special rulebook that helps protect workers and retirees when a company runs out of money. It makes sure people get paid what they are owed, takes care of their benefits, and ensures bosses do not get too much extra pay when the business is broke.
Summary AI
The "Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024" aims to enhance the rights and protections of employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. The bill proposes increasing the priority of employees' unpaid wages and benefits, addressing unfair executive compensation practices, and strengthening the process for modifying or rejecting collective bargaining agreements. It also seeks to ensure that retiree benefits are maintained, improve recoveries for financial losses related to employee retirement plans, and preserve jobs and benefits when companies are reorganized or sold.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024," seeks to amend Title 11 of the United States Code in order to bolster protections for employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. Key aspects of this bill include improving financial recoveries for employees, securing benefits, limiting executive compensations during bankruptcy, and strengthening the position of labor organizations in bankruptcy proceedings. The bill features a comprehensive set of provisions aimed at addressing the financial impact and security of workers affected by the bankruptcy of their employer.
Significant Issues
One outstanding issue arises from the amendments focused on limiting executive compensation (Sections 301-306). The bill imposes strict limitations on executive payouts and bonuses when a company is navigating bankruptcy. This aspect is likely to stir debate as it challenges traditional corporate compensation models and raises ethical considerations about fair treatment in comparison to lower-ranked employees.
Another important issue involves the increased priority given to wage claims in Section 101. By doubling the cap from $10,000 to $20,000 for wage claims, the bill may extensively affect how bankruptcy costs are structured, potentially challenging businesses with added financial burdens in periods of financial distress.
Additional concerns emerge from Section 201’s requirements on rejecting collective bargaining agreements, which could have significant political and labor implications. These requirements involve stringent conditions before rejecting such agreements, potentially empowering unions and labor groups in bankruptcy settings.
Broader Public Impact
The bill could have wide-ranging effects on the labor market and worker protections. Overall, it endeavors to offer stronger financial security to employees and retirees by prioritizing their claims and benefits during bankruptcy proceedings. The enhanced protection measures could lead to greater feelings of job and financial security among workers.
However, the stricter regulations regarding executive compensation and the reinforcement of union positions might deter potential investors or purchasers interested in distressed businesses, possibly complicating court and sale proceedings and affecting company recovery.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For workers and retirees, the proposed legislation generally promises positive impacts by reinforcing protections around wages, benefits, and financial recoveries. By securing wage claims and benefits, employees stand to gain greater financial security in times of business distress.
Conversely, for business executives and employers, the regulations could be perceived as restrictive, particularly concerning compensatory practices during bankruptcy. The bill’s emphasis on limiting executive compensation might hinder management’s ability to retain top talent, as executives may seek better opportunities where such restrictions do not apply.
Furthermore, for labor organizations, the legislation augments their influence by ensuring that claims and negotiations remain a prominent part of bankruptcy proceedings. This could foster stronger collective bargaining conditions and improve labor relations outcomes.
In summary, the bill seeks to recalibrate the balance in bankruptcy proceedings in favor of protecting workers, but these changes come with potential challenges and debates over the impact on corporate governance and economic competitiveness.
Financial Assessment
The "Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024" addresses several financial aspects related to employee and retiree rights in bankruptcy cases. This commentary explores these financial references and their implications.
Increased Wage Priority
Section 101 proposes changes to enhance employees' financial protections by increasing the priority of their wage claims in bankruptcy. It raises the current wage claim priority cap from $10,000 to $20,000. This amendment means that employees' unpaid wages up to $20,000 are prioritized and could be recovered in bankruptcy proceedings before other debts. Removing the clause that limited claims to those earned "within 180 days" of the bankruptcy filing also broadens the timeframe for eligible claims, potentially increasing the financial burden on the bankrupt entity. These changes align with concerns about improving employee recoveries, but they may also raise concerns over increased costs for businesses in financial distress.
Protection of Severance and Benefits
The bill emphasizes the protection of severance pay and contributions to employee benefit plans, ensuring that these financial commitments are treated with higher priority. Severance pay is crucial for laid-off employees, especially during bankruptcy, and the act ensures severance is deemed earned in full upon termination. Additionally, prioritizing contributions to benefit plans means that any due benefits are safeguarded, potentially reducing financial uncertainties for employees during turbulent times.
Executive Compensation Restrictions
Several sections (301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306) focus on restricting executive compensation programs in bankruptcy scenarios. The bill emphasizes limiting disproportionate or excessive compensation to executives, mandating that bonuses or enhancements be comparable to what is offered to non-management employees. For example, executive compensation upon exiting bankruptcy is restricted unless it is part of a program applicable to all full-time employees and does not exceed certain limits. These measures aim at redistributing financial resources toward affected employees, addressing criticisms around fairness and ethical practices.
Impact on Labor and Retiree Benefits
Section 202 protects insurance benefits for retirees, ensuring maintenance of these benefits irrespective of the bankruptcy status. Similarly, Section 203 calls for considering the preservation of employee jobs and benefits during asset sales, potentially impacting how sales are structured to prioritize financial commitments to employee welfare.
Financial Claims for Pension and Withdrawal Liabilities
The bill ensures the court allows claims related to pension shortfalls as a result of plan terminations, as outlined in Section 204, and claims related to withdrawal liabilities under Section 208. These provisions aim to protect retirees’ financial interests when a pension plan is cut due to a company’s financial troubles. However, implementing these measures involves navigating intricate legal and financial frameworks, which can be challenging and may heighten debate over the adequacy of such protections.
Conclusion
Overall, the "Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024" introduces significant changes in financial allocations and priorities in the context of business bankruptcies. It balances employee protections with potential financial implications for businesses, reflecting ongoing debates about fairness and responsibility in corporate and labor relations.
Issues
The amendments to title 11, United States Code, concerning executive compensation (Sections 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306) reflect a significant shift toward limiting executive pay and compensation enhancements in bankruptcy situations. This change may be politically contentious due to its potential to disrupt traditional compensation models for executives, raising ethical debates over fairness and the corporates' responsibilities to their workforce versus their leadership.
The change in Section 101 concerning 'Increased wage priority' suggests amendments that double the wage claim priority cap from $10,000 to $20,000 and remove the 'within 180 days' clause. These changes could have a marked financial impact on how wage claims are processed in bankruptcies, potentially affecting business cost structures and employee expectations during financial distress.
Section 201, 'Rejection of collective bargaining agreements', introduces more stringent requirements and potential repercussions for rejecting collective bargaining agreements during bankruptcy. This change might have strong political ramifications, as it involves balancing bankruptcy efficiency against labor rights, possibly affecting union negotiations and labor conditions broadly.
Modifications in Section 401 and Section 402 regarding 'Union proof of claim' and 'Exception from automatic stay' may significantly influence labor relations during bankruptcies. These sections appear to strengthen union positions by ensuring claims can be filed and labor disputes can proceed, which could engender political debate between labor-friendly and business-friendly factions.
The language used in Sections 202 and 203 regarding 'Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees' and 'Protection of employee benefits in a sale of assets' shows a clear legislative intent to prioritize worker and retiree benefits. While these sections aim to protect employees, the financial implications on asset sales and insurance payouts might spark substantial debate over the practicality and burdens placed on businesses undergoing bankruptcy.
Section 104's changes to 'Financial returns for employees and retirees' ensure the continuation of retiree benefits but do not specify oversight mechanisms, potentially raising ethical questions about the enforcement and protection of employee entitlements during insolvency proceedings.
Section 105 discusses 'Priority for WARN Act damages' but lacks sufficient context, potentially complicating the implementation of back pay or damages in labor disputes which might financially strain the debtor and complicate the prioritization of claims.
The amendments to Sections 204 and 208, regarding 'Claim for pension losses' and 'Claim for withdrawal liability', respectively, involve complex legal and financial terms associated with pensions and liabilities. These raise issues concerning the adequacy and consistency of employee protections and the impact on financial planning for both retirees and businesses in distress.
Throughout various sections, including 102, 205, and 207, the reliance on legal jargon and references to other sophisticated laws such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 may render comprehension and accessibility of the law difficult for non-experts, including stakeholders most impacted by these changes, such as employees and smaller business owners.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The “Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024” outlines measures to improve financial recoveries and protections for employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. It includes enhancing wage priorities, protecting benefits, restricting executive compensation, and addressing collective bargaining and union claims to mitigate losses.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section identifies that business bankruptcies have risen significantly and are affecting job security and retirement, while existing laws to protect workers in such situations are inadequate. It emphasizes the need for legal changes to better support employees and retirees, as management compensation plans often escape sufficient examination amid these bankruptcies.
101. Increased wage priority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends section 507(a) of title 11 of the United States Code to increase the priority cap for wages from $10,000 to $20,000 and specifies that severance pay is earned in full when an employee is laid off or terminated. It also changes the calculation for employee benefit plans, setting it at $20,000 per employee involved in such plans.
Money References
- Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (B) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, by inserting “(A)” before “Fourth”; (C) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated— (i) by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$20,000”; (ii) by striking “within 180 days”; and (iii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first,”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(B) Severance pay described in subparagraph (A)(i) shall be deemed earned in full upon the layoff or termination of employment of the individual to whom the severance is owed.”; and (2) in paragraph (5)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking “within 180 days”; and (ii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first”; and (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: “(B) for each such plan, to the extent of the number of employees covered by each such plan, multiplied by $20,000.”.
102. Claim for stock value losses in defined contribution plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to Title 11 of the United States Code allows individuals in defined contribution plans, like 401(k)s, to claim stock value losses if the stock was part of their plan and the company they work for has committed fraud or violated duties, causing the stock's value to drop. This protection is for employees who are not top executives or well-compensated insiders.
103. Priority for severance pay and contributions to employee benefit plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text amends Section 503(b) of the United States Code to clarify that severance pay for employees of a bankrupt company, except for certain high-level executives and consultants, is considered fully earned when employees are laid off. It also ensures that contributions to employee benefit plans, due after a bankruptcy filing, are included as priorities in bankruptcy proceedings.
104. Financial returns for employees and retirees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill amends title 11 of the United States Code to ensure that a debtor's financial plan includes continuing the payment of retiree benefits and allows claims for changes to those benefits. Additionally, it requires plans to address financial returns or damages for the rejection of collective bargaining agreements, as negotiated between the debtor and authorized representatives.
105. Priority for WARN Act damages Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to ensure that any back pay, civil penalty, or damages due to violations of Federal or State labor laws, including the WARN Act, are prioritized in the same way as wages and benefits in bankruptcy proceedings.
201. Rejection of collective bargaining agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules for rejecting collective bargaining agreements in a bankruptcy case, stating that a debtor or trustee must negotiate in good faith with the labor organization and can only reject the agreement if certain conditions are met, such as proving it's necessary for financial reorganization. It also allows for temporary modifications during negotiations and provides some protections for workers, while ensuring the debtor can continue to operate and reorganize effectively.
202. Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the United States Code about how retiree benefits can be modified during a debtor's bankruptcy proceedings. It specifies the process for making modifications, the conditions under which a court can approve modifications, and emphasizes fair treatment of retirees while ensuring that changes help the debtor exit bankruptcy without unfair burdens on the retirees.
203. Protection of employee benefits in a sale of assets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to prioritize preserving employee jobs, maintaining employment terms, and matching pension and health benefits when selling or leasing a debtor's property. This means that if there are competing offers to buy or lease, the court must choose the one that best protects workers' interests.
204. Claim for pension losses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to allow a court to recognize claims by active or retired participants, or their labor organizations, in pension plans that have been terminated. It allows for claims related to shortfalls in defined benefit plans due to plan termination and sets guidelines for claims in defined contribution plans based on stock value changes.
205. Payments by secured lender Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law to require that if a debtor's employees have not been paid wages or other compensations like vacation or severance after filing for bankruptcy, these unpaid amounts are considered necessary costs for maintaining or selling assets. This means the trustee must collect these funds from the debtor to pay the employees or their benefit plans, even if any agreements suggest otherwise.
206. Preservation of jobs and benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to Chapter 11 of the United States Code emphasize the importance of reorganizing businesses to maximize their value and maintain jobs. It requires that reorganization plans prioritize preserving business value and employment, with preference given to plans that best achieve these goals, especially those involving agreements with employee labor organizations.
1100. Statement of purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A debtor filing a case under this chapter aims to reorganize its business to keep it running successfully by making the best use of its assets and protecting jobs that contribute to the economy.
207. Termination of exclusivity Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to state that there are certain situations where the standard 120-day or 180-day period for exclusive rights can be shortened. This includes cases where a motion is filed to reject a collective bargaining agreement if an alternative plan is likely to be accepted soon, or if a new plan from someone other than the debtor includes terms from a labor organization settlement and is also likely to be accepted soon.
208. Claim for withdrawal liability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law to specify that if a company withdraws from a multi-employer pension plan after starting a bankruptcy case, the company must pay an amount equal to the total pension benefits earned by their employees during the bankruptcy period up until the withdrawal.
301. Executive compensation upon exit from bankruptcy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies executive compensation rules for companies coming out of bankruptcy, ensuring that payments or benefits to top executives or highly paid employees are part of a program for all full-time employees and are not excessively higher than pay for non-management employees. Additionally, any compensation must be court-approved to be reasonable compared to similar roles in the industry and cannot be excessive given the company's financial situation.
302. Limitations on executive compensation enhancements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends U.S. bankruptcy law to add limitations on executive compensation enhancements for certain employees of a bankrupt company. It specifies that incentives, bonuses, and other compensation increases for top executives, managers, and consultants are subject to stringent conditions and court approval to ensure fair treatment for all employees.
303. Prohibition against special compensation payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it is stated that no financial plans or benefits for insiders, top executives, or certain other employees of a company will be approved if the company, within one year before filing for bankruptcy, has stopped or reduced severance pay for its non-management workers. Additionally, for specific transactions, the trustee must get court approval after notifying those involved and giving them a chance to be heard.
304. Assumption of executive benefit plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to prohibit the assumption of deferred compensation arrangements and retiree benefit plans for high-level executives and highly compensated employees if certain employee benefit plans have been terminated or reduced.
305. Recovery of executive compensation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would allow a court to require the return of part of executive compensation if a company reduces employee benefits or if a pension plan gets terminated before bankruptcy. If these conditions are met, the trustee or others may pursue reimbursement of any compensation given to key company executives shortly before bankruptcy to help pay the company's debts.
563. Recovery of executive compensation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a company's financial obligations are reduced due to changes in employee or retiree benefit plans, the court will determine how much these obligations have decreased. The company must then return a matching percentage of compensation paid to top executives or board members. If no one takes action to recover this money before a certain deadline, any interested party can seek court approval to do so. The company cannot give post-bankruptcy compensation to those executives or board members if it's meant to replace the money retrieved under this rule.
306. Preferential compensation transfer Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes a change to allow a trustee to reclaim any transfer made within a year before a company files for bankruptcy if it benefits insiders, high-paid employees, or consultants related to the debtor. If the trustee or a committee fails to act, other interested parties can ask the court for permission to claim these transfers for the benefit of the estate.
401. Union proof of claim Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 401 amends Section 501(a) of title 11 of the United States Code to explicitly include labor organizations in the definition of who can be considered a creditor.
402. Exception from automatic stay Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the United States bankruptcy law by adding an exception to the automatic stay rule. It allows grievance or arbitration proceedings related to a collective bargaining agreement to continue or start against someone who has filed for bankruptcy, and also permits the enforcement of an award or settlement from such proceedings.
403. Effect on collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that in bankruptcy cases involving debtors under the Railway Labor Act, courts and trustees can't modify wages, working conditions, or retirement benefits defined by a collective bargaining agreement unless it's done following the specific rules of the Railway Labor Act.