Overview
Title
To establish the National Institutes of Clean Energy.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to set up a big group to work on making clean energy, which means using power that doesn’t hurt the planet, and it plans to spend a lot of money over ten years to do this. They also want to make sure the power helps areas that need it most and gives people good jobs.
Summary AI
S. 5373 aims to establish the National Institutes of Clean Energy as an agency under the Department of Energy by January 1, 2028. The agency will focus on investing in clean energy and climate science research, promoting technologies that reduce emissions, and fostering innovation to build climate resilience. It will prioritize projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, improve public health, and support workforce development, particularly emphasizing research in areas with significant job losses. The bill authorizes $400 billion for the period from 2025 to 2034 to fund the establishment and operation of these institutes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2024" is a legislative proposal introduced in the United States Senate. Its primary objective is to establish the National Institutes of Clean Energy by 2028 as part of the Department of Energy. The Institutes aim to focus on research and development of clean energy technologies. The Act prioritizes investments in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, supporting communities disproportionately affected by climate change and pollution, and fostering job creation in clean energy sectors. Significant funding of $400 billion is authorized for the fiscal years 2025 through 2034 to achieve these goals.
Significant Issues
The bill raises several notable concerns:
Funding Allocation: The substantial allocation of $400 billion over ten years demands detailed justification to ensure the funds are used efficiently and not wasted. Without a clear breakdown of how these funds will be distributed, there is potential for misuse or favoritism.
Subjective Terminology: Terms such as "high-quality jobs with strong labor standards" are subjective and require clearer definitions to ensure consistent application and transparency in job creation initiatives.
Complex Criteria: The definitions provided for key terms, like "advanced energy technology" and "frontline, vulnerable, and disadvantaged communities," are broad and complex. This can lead to ambiguity in implementation and may benefit from simplification for better clarity.
Outdated Scope: The bill specifies certain renewable energy technologies, which might restrict future advancements unless the list is periodically updated to include emerging technologies.
Impact on the Public
Broad Impact
If passed, the bill could significantly influence the development and adoption of clean energy technologies across the United States. By prioritizing clean energy innovation and investment in research, the bill aims to reduce emissions and combat climate change, potentially benefiting public health and the environment. This focus also suggests a transition towards more sustainable energy sources, which is crucial for long-term ecological stability.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
Public Universities and Minority-Serving Institutions: These educational institutions may benefit from increased research funding, fostering innovation and providing students with opportunities in emerging industries.
Disadvantaged Communities: Communities disproportionately affected by environmental issues could see improvements in public health and increased job opportunities.
Workers in Traditional Energy Sectors: The bill emphasizes workforce development, aiding workers transitioning from traditional energy sectors to roles in clean energy industries.
Potential Negative Impacts
Traditional Energy Companies: These companies might face challenges as the focus shifts towards renewable and clean energy technologies, potentially impacting profitability and jobs in non-renewable sectors.
Regulatory and Administrative Challenges: Implementing the bill's provisions could strain resources due to its broad scope and the complexity of administering substantial funding allocations.
In conclusion, the "National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2024" presents a robust plan for advancing clean energy technology and addressing climate change. However, its success depends on addressing the highlighted issues such as ensuring efficient use of funds, clarifying subjective language, and accommodating future technological advancements. These considerations are crucial for maximizing the bill's positive impact on both the general public and specific stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
The bill titled S. 5373, known as the "National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2024," authorizes a significant financial allocation of $400 billion to establish and operate the National Institutes of Clean Energy. This funding spans a period from fiscal years 2025 to 2034. The primary objective is to support research and innovation in clean energy technologies through an agency under the Department of Energy.
Financial Appropriation Overview
The authorization of $400 billion for this initiative is a significant investment directed toward promoting clean energy research and addressing climate-related challenges. The funding is intended to bolster new technologies, improve public health in disadvantaged communities, and provide support for workforce development, particularly in regions that have experienced significant job losses.
Issues Related to Financial Allocation
Lack of Detailed Justification: The sheer scale of the $400 billion allocation is substantial. However, the bill does not provide a detailed breakdown of how these funds will be allocated across various projects and initiatives. This absence of clarity raises concerns about potential inefficiencies or wastefulness. Specifying the distribution of funds could enhance transparency and ensure that the financial resources are utilized effectively.
Unspecified Distribution Methodology: While the bill authorizes a considerable amount of funding, it does not outline the criteria or mechanisms for distributing these resources. This lack of specification could lead to issues of equitable allocation or potential favoritism. A clear framework for fund distribution is crucial to avoid subjective or biased allocation practices, ensuring that all priority areas receive appropriate support.
Vague Terminology for Job Creation: The bill mentions prioritizing the creation of "high-quality jobs with strong labor standards." However, this terminology is subjective and could benefit from clearer definitions. Without specific criteria for what constitutes a high-quality job, the intended financial impact on job creation and workforce development might be inconsistent or unclear.
Complexity in Definitions: The bill introduces various complex terms, such as defining "advanced energy technology" and identifying "frontline, vulnerable, and disadvantaged communities." These definitions, while comprehensive, might complicate the implementation of financial allocations, potentially leading to ambiguities in determining eligibility for funding.
Need for Periodic Updates: The definition of "renewable energy source" in the bill includes specific technologies. While this provides direction for current funding allocations, it may limit the bill's flexibility to accommodate future technological advancements. Regular updates to these definitions could ensure that the financial resources remain relevant and adaptable to emerging and innovative clean energy solutions.
In conclusion, while the financial commitment outlined in the bill demonstrates a substantial investment in clean energy initiatives, careful consideration and clarification of fund allocation, distribution, and terminology are necessary. Addressing these areas can ensure that the financial resources effectively support the bill's objectives and achieve the intended benefits across various communities and sectors.
Issues
The allocation of $400,000,000,000 over ten years is substantial and may require more detailed justification or breakdown to ensure it is not wasteful. (Section 2)
There is no specification of how the authorized funds will be distributed, raising concerns about equitable allocation or potential favoritism. (Section 2)
The term 'high-quality jobs with strong labor standards' is subjective and may need clearer definition to ensure transparency and consistency in job creation. (Section 2)
The definition of 'advanced energy technology' includes several broad criteria, which could lead to ambiguity in implementation. (Section 2)
The criteria for 'frontline, vulnerable, and disadvantaged communities' are comprehensive but complex and could benefit from simplification for clarity. (Section 2)
The capitalization of the term 'Institutes' without specific naming or differentiation might cause confusion without clear naming conventions or titles. (Section 2)
The priority for research and development in geographic areas with significant job losses lacks clarity on how these areas will be identified or ranked, which could lead to subjective interpretation. (Section 2)
The definition of 'renewable energy source' includes specific technologies that may limit the scope for future technologies unless periodically updated. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, officially naming it the “National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2024.”
2. National Institutes of Clean Energy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes the National Institutes of Clean Energy by 2028 under the Department of Energy, aiming to invest in research and development of clean energy technologies, with a focus on reducing emissions, supporting affected communities, and creating jobs. It defines key terms such as "advanced energy technology" and prioritizes projects at public and minority-serving institutions, with a significant budget authorized for fiscal years 2025 through 2034.
Money References
- (d) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated $400,000,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2034 to establish and operate the Institutes.