Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve and enhance the work opportunity tax credit, to encourage longer-service employment, and to modernize the credit to make it more effective as a hiring incentive for targeted workers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a plan to help people get more jobs by giving businesses a bigger reward when they hire certain groups of people, like veterans or those getting food help. It also wants to help people stay in their jobs for longer to earn even more rewards, starting from the year 2025.
Summary AI
The bill, S. 5370, aims to update the Internal Revenue Code to improve the work opportunity tax credit, which businesses can use to lower their taxes if they hire targeted employees. It proposes increasing the percentage of first-year wages that can be claimed, especially for those employed for longer periods and eligible veterans. The bill also removes the upper age limit for qualifying recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance benefits to encourage more hiring. These changes would apply to individuals starting work after December 31, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This bill, titled the "Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with several key objectives. The primary focus is on enhancing the work opportunity tax credit (WOTC) to better incentivize hiring from targeted worker groups. Significant changes include increasing the credit percentage and adjusting wage limits, especially for veterans, alongside modifications for other categories such as summer youth employees and long-term family assistance recipients. Additionally, the bill proposes removing age restrictions for certain beneficiaries of supplemental nutrition assistance who qualify for the tax credit.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue pertains to the increase of the work opportunity tax credit from 40% to 50% of qualified first-year wages. This adjustment may result in substantial revenue loss for the government without a comprehensive analysis of the anticipated economic benefits. Additionally, the disparities in wage limits for veterans as opposed to non-veterans raise concerns regarding fairness and equitable treatment. The removal of the age restriction for supplemental nutrition assistance recipients could alter eligibility numbers and program costs, leading to unpredictability in fiscal planning.
Further issues arise from the complex language used in the bill, which might impede broad comprehension and public discourse. There is also a notable lack of justification for delaying the implementation of these changes until after December 31, 2024. For some, this delay might obscure the legislative intent or the practical reasoning behind the timing.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could encourage businesses to hire more individuals from targeted groups by making it financially beneficial through enhanced credits, potentially aiding in lower unemployment rates for disadvantaged populations. However, the effectiveness of these measures depends on the clarity of the bill and how well changes are communicated and implemented.
On the negative side, increasing the credits without detailed analysis and justification could lead to decreased government revenue, potentially affecting other public services if adjustments are not appropriately managed.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Businesses and Employers: Organizations might benefit significantly from the increase in tax credits, potentially allowing them to offset hiring costs for particular employees. This could lead to a more diverse workforce if targeted groups are actively hired.
Veterans: Veterans, especially those who qualify for higher wage limits, might see a positive impact as employers are incentivized to hire them, thus potentially reducing veteran unemployment rates. However, this could inadvertently create a disparity between veterans and non-veteran workers.
Recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance: By removing the age limit, the bill could expand opportunities for older recipients to gain employment, offering them increased financial stability.
Government and Taxpayers: The potential revenue shortfalls resulting from increased tax credits could pose a challenge for the government. If not balanced by economic growth or increased tax compliance, this might impact public budget allocations.
Overall, while the intent of the bill seeks to promote inclusive hiring practices, its implications necessitate careful consideration and transparent communication to ensure balanced and effective policy outcomes.
Financial Assessment
The bill S. 5370 proposes changes to the work opportunity tax credit under the Internal Revenue Code. It focuses on increasing financial incentives for employers to hire individuals from certain target groups by amending various sections related to the credit. Here is an analysis of the financial references and implications presented in the bill:
Increased Tax Credit Percentage
The bill outlines an increase in the work opportunity tax credit from 40% to 50% of an individual's qualified first-year wages up to $6,000. Additionally, for employees who work at least 400 hours in the first year, the credit extends to 50% on wages that fall between $6,000 and $12,000. This financial amendment aims to incentivize longer-term employment and boost hiring but could lead to a significant revenue loss for the government. There is a concern that without a thorough analysis of the economic benefits these changes might yield, the increase could strain government resources without guarantee of offsetting benefits through increased employment or GDP growth.
Enhanced Benefits for Veterans
The bill provides increased wage limits for calculating tax credits for qualified veterans. For example, eligible veterans have increased wage thresholds up to $24,000 and sometimes up to $48,000, allowing them to generate higher tax credits for their employers. While this aims to support veteran employment, it also raises concerns about unequal treatment between veterans and non-veterans, potentially leading to discussions on fairness and whether this aligns with overarching employment policies.
Special Considerations for Long-Term Family Assistance Recipients
For long-term family assistance recipients, the work opportunity tax credit is adjusted to 40% of qualified first-year wages up to $10,000, and 50% of second-year wages up to $10,000. This provision could be seen as offering preferential treatment as it introduces distinct criteria for different groups, and while it may have positive social outcomes, it requires clear justification to avoid perceptions of unfairness.
Changes to Youth and Age-Based Eligibility
There are also notable changes regarding summer youth employees and recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance. The bill limits the qualified wage base for youth employees to $3,000 and removes the upper age limit of 40 for supplemental nutrition assistance program recipients. These amendments aim to broaden eligibility and simplify credit calculation but introduce potential fiscal impacts. Changes in eligibility criteria might alter the program's cost structure, affecting federal budgets dedicated to these incentives.
Implementation Timing
The bill specifies that its provisions will only apply to individuals beginning employment after December 31, 2024. The rationale behind this delay is not explicitly provided, leading to concerns about the transparency of legislative intent. Such delays might obscure understanding of how and when these changes will impact employers and governmental budgets.
Conclusion
The financial references in this bill reflect significant adjustments intended to update the work opportunity tax credit. While these changes could stimulate employment within target groups, they also raise crucial issues related to potential revenue loss, unequal treatment, and fiscal unpredictability that need to be addressed or clarified in future discussions. These concerns suggest a need for a detailed analysis to ensure that the amendments achieve their intended economic and social benefits without undue financial strain.
Issues
The amendment to Section 51(a) which increases the work opportunity tax credit from 40% to 50% of qualified first-year wages, may lead to a significant revenue loss for the government without a thorough analysis of the potential economic benefits. (Section 2)
The amendments in Section 51(b)(3) that grant increased wage limitations for veterans could result in unequal treatment between veterans and non-veterans, which might raise ethical concerns regarding fairness and equity. (Section 2)
The removal of the age limit for qualified supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits recipients in Section 51(d)(8)(A)(i) may have a fiscal impact or alter eligibility numbers and program costs. Without a detailed explanation of expected changes, this could lead to financial unpredictability. (Section 3)
There is a lack of justification or discussion regarding the delay in the implementation of the amendments until after December 31, 2024, which might obscure the legislative intent or practical rationale for timing. (Section 2)
Complex language used in various subsections, such as 51(i)(3) and 51(d)(7)(B), could hinder broad comprehension and accessibility, potentially limiting informed public discourse and stakeholder understanding. (Section 2)
The changes that provide special rules for long-term family assistance recipients in Section 51(e), including different percentages and wage thresholds, may be perceived as preferential treatment unless clearly justified. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act establishes the official name as the "Improve and Enhance the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Act".
2. Improving and enhancing work opportunity tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to increase the work opportunity tax credit from 40% to 50% for certain wages, adjusts the wage limits for veterans, refines rules regarding minimum employment periods, modifies the treatment for summer youth employees and long-term family assistance recipients, and sets the changes to apply to employees starting work after December 31, 2024.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 51(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “shall be equal to 40 percent” and all that follows and inserting the following: “shall be equal to the sum of— “(1) 50 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to each individual for such year as does not exceed $6,000, plus “(2) in the case of individuals who have performed at least 400 hours of service for the employer, 50 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to each such individual for such year as exceeds $6,000, and does not exceed $12,000.”
- (b) Conforming amendments relating to limitation on wages taken into account for certain veterans.—Section 51(b)(3) of such Code is amended to read as follows: “(3) INCREASED LIMITATION ON WAGES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR VETERANS.—The $6,000 and $12,000 amounts under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) shall be increased to— “(A) $12,000 and $24,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii)(I), “(B) $14,000 and $28,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(iv), and “(C) $24,000 and $48,000, respectively, in the case of any individual who is a qualified veteran by reason of subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii)(II).”.
- (2) Section 51(i)(3)(A) of such Code is amended by striking “40 percent” and inserting “50 percent”. (d) Conforming amendments relating to treatment of summer youth employees.—Section 51(d)(7)(B) of such Code is amended— (1) by striking clause (ii), (2) by striking “, and” at the end of clause (i) and inserting a period, (3) by redesignating clause (i) (as so amended) as clause (v), and (4) by inserting before such clause (v) (as so redesignated) the following new clauses: “(i) in lieu of the amount determined under subsection (a), the amount of the work opportunity credit determined under this section for the taxable year shall be equal to 40 percent of the qualified first-year wages for such year, “(ii) in the case of an individual described in subsection (i)(3)(A), clause (i) shall be applied by substituting ‘25 percent’ for ‘40 percent’, “(iii) in the case of an individual described in subsection (i)(3)(B), no wages shall be taken into account under clause (i), and “(iv) the amount of qualified first-year wages which may be taken into account with respect to such individual shall not exceed $3,000 per year, and”. (e) Conforming amendments relating to long-Term family assistance recipients.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(e)(1) of such Code is amended by striking “family assistance recipient—” and all that follows and inserting the following: “family assistance recipient, in lieu of subsection (a), the amount of the work opportunity credit determined under this section for the taxable year shall be equal to— “(1) 40 percent of so much of the qualified first-year wages with respect to such individual for such year as does not exceed $10,000, and “(2) 50 percent of so much of the qualified second-year wages with respect to such individual for such year as does not exceed $10,000.”
3. Removal of age limit for qualified supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits recipient Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section removes the age limit of 40 for people receiving qualified supplemental nutrition assistance benefits who get a tax credit for employment, according to the Internal Revenue Code. The change will affect those who start working for an employer after December 31, 2024.