Overview

Title

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain Federal land or water under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is about letting people use lead bullets and fishing hooks on certain public lands, unless they are proven to hurt local animals, and it makes sure rules fit with state laws.

Summary AI

The bill, titled the "Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025," aims to prevent the U.S. government from banning lead ammunition or tackle used for hunting and fishing on federal lands and waters. However, the bill allows for exceptions if it's proven that lead usage is causing a decline in wildlife at a specific location, and any regulations must align with state laws and policies. This legislation restricts the power of the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to enforce such prohibitions unless specific conditions are met.

Published

2025-02-12
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-02-12
Package ID: BILLS-119s537is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
747
Pages:
4
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 250
Verbs: 40
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 15
Entities: 59

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.99
Average Sentence Length:
83.00
Token Entropy:
4.55
Readability (ARI):
42.32

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill, titled the "Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025," seeks to prevent the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition and tackle on specific federal lands and waters. This legislation is aimed at lands managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management, as well as forest lands overseen by the Forest Service. The bill contains a provision that allows for exceptions where a decline in wildlife populations, attributed specifically to lead use, can be scientifically demonstrated, and the prohibition aligns with state law or policies.

Summary of Significant Issues

One major issue with the bill is the lack of clear criteria for identifying a "decline in wildlife population" that would trigger an exception to the general rule against prohibiting lead use. This vagueness might lead to inconsistent application and enforcement, potentially hampering wildlife conservation efforts. Furthermore, the methodology for collecting and verifying "field data" to assess the impact of lead is not defined, which could result in conflicts about the reliability of the scientific basis for any restrictions.

The bill also permits exceptions to federal regulations based on state laws or policies. This flexibility could lead to potential conflict between federal and state authorities, complicating the management of federal lands and waters. Another concern is the absence of a specified timeline for publishing notices about new prohibitions or regulations in the Federal Register, which may inadvertently delay public understanding and compliance.

Lastly, the bill does not provide a formal mechanism for public input or stakeholder engagement, raising questions about transparency and accountability in the decision-making process.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this legislation could impact the general public by preserving the use of lead ammunition and tackle on federal properties, which hunters and anglers might find beneficial due to the continued availability of traditional hunting and fishing materials. However, it could also raise environmental and public health concerns, given the known risks associated with lead exposure in ecosystems.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For hunters and anglers, the bill could be viewed positively as it maintains access to familiar equipment without the added burden of potentially more expensive alternatives like non-lead ammunition and tackle. State wildlife agencies might initially perceive an advantage in having power over decisions regarding lead use, ensuring alignment with local conservation policies.

Conversely, environmental groups and public health advocates might express concern over the continued use of lead, given its toxic nature and adverse effects on wildlife and human health. This could lead to increased advocacy for stricter federal regulations and more uniform policies across states.

Overall, the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025 presents a mix of benefits and challenges, reflecting a balance between traditional recreational activities and evolving environmental and health imperatives.

Issues

  • The lack of specified criteria for determining a 'decline in wildlife population' in Section 2 could lead to inconsistent application and uncertainty in enforcement decisions, potentially impacting wildlife conservation efforts negatively.

  • Section 2 does not provide a clear method for collecting and verifying 'field data' used to assess the impact of lead in ammunition or tackle on wildlife populations. This lack of clarity could lead to disputes over the validity of any prohibitions or regulations imposed.

  • Allowing exceptions based on state law or state fish and wildlife department policies (Section 2) could lead to conflicts between state and federal regulations, creating legal and administrative challenges in the management of Federal land and water.

  • There is a requirement for a Federal Register notice explaining prohibitions or regulations (Section 2), but no timeline for its publication is provided, which could delay transparency and public awareness of new regulations.

  • Section 2 does not mention any process for public input or stakeholder engagement, leaving key decisions in the hands of government officials without public consultation, which could raise ethical concerns about transparency and accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section establishes the short title of the Act, which is called the “Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025.”

2. Protecting access for hunters and anglers on Federal land and water Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that, generally, the use of lead ammunition or tackle cannot be banned on Federal lands open to hunting or fishing, nor can regulations be made about the lead levels in such ammunition or tackle. However, an exception allows bans or regulations if it's shown that lead is causing wildlife population declines in a specific area, and if these actions align with state laws or policies.