Overview
Title
To establish a national plan to coordinate research on epilepsy, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a big plan to help people with epilepsy, a condition that makes people have seizures. It suggests getting help from experts and sharing ideas with other countries, but it doesn't say how much money is needed to do all this.
Summary AI
S. 5353 proposes the establishment of a "National Plan for Epilepsy" to improve efforts in preventing, diagnosing, treating, and curing epilepsy in the United States. The bill outlines various activities for the Secretary of Health, including coordinating national research, enhancing early diagnosis and treatment, and engaging with the global community on epilepsy initiatives. It requires an advisory council composed of experts and patients to guide these efforts and mandates annual reports to Congress on progress and recommendations for future actions. The initiatives aim to enhance the quality of life for those living with epilepsy while reducing the financial burdens associated with the condition.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled S. 5353 - National Plan for Epilepsy Act was introduced to the United States Senate with the objective of establishing a coordinated national strategy to address epilepsy. This legislation is aimed at improving the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and potential cure for epilepsy by facilitating cooperation among federal agencies and other stakeholders. The bill outlines the need for a comprehensive approach to address the challenges faced by the epilepsy community, involving the establishment of an Advisory Council and regular assessments and reports to Congress.
General Summary
The National Plan for Epilepsy Act seeks to organize and enhance the efforts surrounding epilepsy research and care within the United States. It mandates the creation of a "National Plan for Epilepsy," led by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This plan would encompass various activities, including creating an integrated national strategy, promoting the development of treatments, and improving care coordination. The act also proposes the formation of an Advisory Council consisting of diverse representatives to guide these efforts. Annual assessments and reports to Congress are required to evaluate progress. The initiative is set to expire on December 31, 2035.
Significant Issues
A prominent issue with the bill is the absence of specified budget or funding allocations, which may lead to uncertainties in implementation and resource management. The lack of detailed criteria for selecting members of the Advisory Council poses a potential risk of favoritism or bias, affecting the diversity and integrity of the council. Furthermore, the bill's language includes broad terms, giving the Secretary discretionary power to undertake additional unspecified activities, raising concerns about potential misuse. Data sharing mandates are present, but lack clarity on privacy and security measures, posing risks to data confidentiality. The complexity of language could pose comprehension challenges for the general public. Lastly, although the bill contains a sunset clause, it does not specify plans for reviewing or continuing effective programs beyond its expiration.
Public Impact
Broadly, the National Plan for Epilepsy Act aims to improve the quality of life for individuals affected by epilepsy by enhancing healthcare practices and fostering research into treatment and cures. Improved coordination between federal agencies could lead to more efficient use of resources and the development of consistent policies across sectors. However, the unspecified funding and resource allocations might hinder effective implementation and create potential for resource misappropriation.
Impact on Stakeholders
For individuals living with epilepsy, their families, and caregivers, the proposed legislation holds potential for improving access to specialized care and developing more effective treatment options. It could amplify focus on epilepsy, potentially reducing stigma and enhancing public awareness through coordinated efforts. Medical and healthcare professionals could benefit from more structured guidelines and enhanced research opportunities. However, without concrete funding and data privacy measures, stakeholders might encounter challenges related to resource adequacy and data security. Nonprofit organizations and advocacy groups might find value in contributing to legislative feedback, although ambiguity in Council member selection may affect their participation.
Overall, while the National Plan for Epilepsy Act introduces a promising framework for enhancing epilepsy care and research, addressing the identified issues will be critical to maximizing its potential benefits for all stakeholders involved.
Financial Assessment
The bill, S. 5353, titled the “National Plan for Epilepsy Act,” does not include specific monetary allocations or appropriations which would typically indicate how much funding should be allocated to implement its proposed national plan. Instead, it references financial concerns indirectly through statements found in the bill, highlighting the economic impact of epilepsy on individuals and the healthcare system.
Household Income and Economic Burden
The bill mentions that 53% of individuals with uncontrolled seizures live in households earning less than $25,000 per year. This highlights the economic struggles faced by many individuals with epilepsy, which could indicate a potential area where financial aid or targeted resources might alleviate financial stress.
Moreover, the bill indicates that the healthcare costs associated with epilepsy and seizures exceed $54 billion per year in the United States. This immense financial burden on the healthcare system underscores the pressing need for efficient allocation of resources toward research, treatment, and preventative measures. However, without specific funding provisions or strategies to address these costs, the bill may struggle to achieve meaningful financial impact.
Issues Related to Financing
One significant issue identified is the lack of specific budget allocations or funding sources assigned to the National Plan for Epilepsy. This absence can lead to ambiguities in how funds will be raised, distributed, and managed. It raises questions about the bill's effectiveness in addressing the economic issues it outlines, given the substantial costs already highlighted.
Another point of concern involves the open-ended nature of the activities the Secretary is empowered to undertake. While the bill suggests comprehensive involvement in various areas such as research coordination and international collaboration, the lack of clear financial guidelines or restrictions for these activities could risk resource misallocation.
Data Sharing Without Financial Framework
The data sharing requirement mentioned in the bill does not address the costs related to establishing secure data infrastructure. Effective data sharing is crucial for comprehensive research and care coordination, yet without financial guidelines or considerations for data protection measures, funding could be diverted to address unforeseen challenges in data security and management.
In summary, S. 5353 highlights important financial burdens associated with epilepsy but does not provide direct solutions through specified funding or appropriations. By not addressing how funds will be generated or distributed, the bill may lack the necessary support to make substantive financial impacts or to meet its ambitious goals.
Issues
The bill does not specify a budget or funding source for the National Plan for Epilepsy, which could result in ambiguities in spending and resource allocation. This is relevant to sections 3 and 320C.
The language in section 3 and subsection (a)(2)(J) of section 320C allows the Secretary to determine additional activities, which is broad and open-ended, potentially leading to misuse or misallocation of resources.
Section 3 and subsection (c)(2) of section 320C lack detailed criteria for selecting the members of the Advisory Council, which might result in bias or favoritism.
The bill mentions data sharing requirements in section 320C subsection (e), but does not clarify privacy or data protection measures, raising concerns about data security and confidentiality.
The complexity of language throughout section 3 and 320C might make it difficult for the general public to understand without legal or specialized knowledge.
The bill's sunset clause in section 320C subsection (f) specifies its expiry date but does not mention plans for post-sunset review or continuation, potentially leading to abrupt discontinuation of effective programs.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that this legislation is officially named the "National Plan for Epilepsy Act."
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress makes the following findings: Epilepsy is a brain condition causing seizures, affecting millions of adults and children in the U.S., with various causes and often resulting in uncontrolled seizures for some. The condition increases the risk of early death and impacts the ability to work, with significant healthcare costs; many affected people live in low-income households.
Money References
- (8) Fifty-three percent of individuals with uncontrolled seizures live in households earning less than $25,000 per year.
- (9) Health care costs associated with epilepsy and seizures exceed $54,000,000,000 per year in the United States.
3. Establishing a National Plan for Epilepsy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes a National Plan for Epilepsy to improve the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of epilepsy by coordinating federal agency efforts, encouraging development of effective treatments, and reviewing the impact of epilepsy on individuals and caregivers. An Advisory Council will be formed to provide recommendations, and annual assessments and reports will be submitted to Congress to evaluate and enhance epilepsy-related initiatives, with the plan expiring on December 31, 2035.
320C. Programs relating to epilepsy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the "National Plan for Epilepsy," which tasks the Secretary of Health and Human Services with developing a comprehensive national program aimed at preventing, diagnosing, treating, and curing epilepsy. It includes forming an Advisory Council, assessing annual progress, reporting to Congress, and ensuring data sharing between relevant agencies, with the initiative set to expire at the end of 2035.