Overview
Title
An Act To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a correctional facility, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure people can't sneak phones into prisons by putting stricter rules in place. It plans to send people to jail for up to two years if they do, and also wants the people in charge of prisons to make better rules to stop other bad stuff from being snuck in.
Summary AI
S. 5284 aims to increase the penalties for providing prohibited items, like phones, in correctional facilities. It amends section 1791 of title 18 of the United States Code to impose up to two years of imprisonment for such violations. Additionally, it requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to review and update policies to better protect both inmates and staff from contraband issues within a year of the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act," seeks to enhance penalties for the unlawful provision of phones within correctional facilities. It amends specific sections of the United States Code, adding stricter punishment—up to two years in prison—for violations. Additionally, it mandates the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to conduct a review and update policies concerning prohibited objects, aiming to bolster the safety of staff and incarcerated individuals within one year of the bill's enactment.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the ambiguity concerning the type of "phone" being prohibited. Without clear definitions, enforcement could be uneven, with potential for misuse of the arresting powers. Furthermore, the bill references subsection (d)(1)(F) without providing sufficient context, which could make it difficult to understand the amendment's full implications.
Another concern involves the absence of detailed enforcement mechanisms. The bill does not elaborate on how the new penalties will be monitored or enforced, potentially undermining its deterrence objectives. In Section 3, the provision for policy reviews and updates is vague regarding the scope and depth expected, which could lead to unsatisfactory revisions that fail to address the core issues effectively. Additionally, the timeline of "not later than 1 year" for these actions lacks a specific start date, which might result in delays.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could improve security within correctional facilities by deterring the introduction of contraband phones, which can be used for illicit communications. By imposing stricter penalties, the bill may decrease unauthorized phone use, thereby increasing institutional safety. However, without clear definitions and enforcement strategies, the bill's effectiveness remains uncertain, possibly diminishing public confidence in legislative actions addressing prison safety.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For prison staff and management, the bill aims to provide a safer environment by curtailing inmates' access to contraband phones, potentially reducing external criminal activity and internal disorder. Clarification and enforcement of these measures are crucial to ensure their effectiveness.
Incarcerated individuals may view the bill as necessary for maintaining fairness and order inside facilities, though it could also pose challenges, particularly if enforcement practices are perceived as excessive or inconsistent due to vague language.
Legal professionals and advocates might express concerns regarding the vague references and lack of specificity, which could lead to challenges in interpretation and application. They may argue for clearer guidelines and definitions within the bill to ensure fair application and avoid potential legal disputes.
Overall, while the bill intends to enhance prison security, its efficacy depends heavily on the clarity of definitions, the specificity of context, and the implementation of supporting procedures. Addressing these issues would be essential for the bill to achieve its intended purpose effectively.
Issues
The lack of clarity in Section 2 regarding the specific type of 'phone' being prohibited could lead to ambiguity in enforcement and interpretation. Ensuring clear definitions is crucial to avoid misuse or misapplication of the law.
Section 2's reference to subsection (d)(1)(F) without sufficient context or detail might confuse readers or lawmakers, making it difficult to understand the amendment's purpose and implications. Such vagueness could lead to legal challenges or interpretations that do not align with legislative intent.
The absence of detailed enforcement mechanisms and compliance monitoring procedures in Section 2 may result in inconsistencies in the application of penalties, potentially undermining the bill's effectiveness in deterring contraband provision.
In Section 3, the unspecified extent of the 'review' and 'update' could lead to inadequacies in policy reform within the Bureau of Prisons, affecting the bill's ability to enhance safety for incarcerated individuals and staff.
The vague timeline in Section 3, 'Not later than 1 year', without a clear starting point could lead to delays in the implementation of necessary policy reviews and updates, potentially affecting prison security and operations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act described in this section is called the “Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act.”
2. Prohibited provision of a phone Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies a part of the United States Code related to prohibited actions involving phones. It adds a new rule that specifies a punishment of up to 2 years in prison for certain violations and adjusts the numbering of existing rules within the same section.
3. Review of policies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons is required to review and update policies related to inmates involved with prohibited objects within one year of the enactment of this Act, in order to enhance safety for both incarcerated individuals and staff.