Overview

Title

To require the Federal Trade Commission to study the role of intermediaries in the pharmaceutical supply chain and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 asks a group called the FTC to look at people in between who help get medicine from the makers to the stores, to see if they are being fair with prices. This group then has to tell the government what they find and suggest ways to make it better by making sure everyone is playing fair.

Summary AI

S. 527, known as the "Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025," requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to conduct a study on intermediaries in the pharmaceutical supply chain. The FTC must report to Congress on various issues such as pharmacy benefit manager practices, competition in the healthcare supply chain, and any legal barriers affecting drug prices. The final report, due a year after the bill's enactment, will include policy and legislative recommendations to improve transparency, enhance competition, and prevent anticompetitive behavior. Additionally, an interim report with preliminary findings must be submitted six months after enactment.

Published

2025-04-10
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2025-04-10
Package ID: BILLS-119s527rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,034
Pages:
8
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 365
Verbs: 65
Adjectives: 62
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 26
Entities: 72

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.61
Average Sentence Length:
57.44
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
32.43

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025," seeks to mandate the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate the roles of intermediaries within the pharmaceutical supply chain. It requires the commission to examine the practices of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and their impact on drug prices and competition. The bill instructs the FTC to submit reports to Congress detailing their findings, including whether these intermediaries engage in anticompetitive practices or actions that lead to higher drug prices. Additionally, the bill looks at whether existing legal frameworks hinder consumer protection and antitrust enforcement.

Summary of Significant Issues

A few significant issues arise from the bill's provisions.

First, the definition of terms like "higher cost" and "lower cost" prescription drugs is ambiguous. This ambiguity might lead to various interpretations, potentially affecting formulary designs and costs for consumers.

Second, the bill sets deadlines for interim and final reports from the FTC but does not outline consequences for delays. This lack of enforcement could delay necessary reforms in the pharmaceutical supply chain.

Third, the bill does not provide detailed metrics or standards for evaluating competition, transparency, and consumer benefits. This omission creates challenges in assessing whether the legislation's goals are effectively met.

Fourth, while the bill considers observations from a past roundtable, it does not require current data or analysis, potentially leading to outdated or irrelevant findings.

Finally, in the section addressing anticompetitive behavior by drug manufacturers, the lack of a specified timeline for submitting reports could result in delays in legal actions and protection measures.

Potential Impact on the Public

The bill has significant implications for the general public, particularly consumers of prescription drugs. By investigating the practices of intermediaries like PBMs, the bill aims to uncover potential anticompetitive behavior that could drive up drug prices. Ideally, this scrutiny could lead to increased transparency and competition, benefiting consumers through lower costs and better access to medications.

Additionally, if the bill successfully identifies and mitigates barriers within the supply chain, it could enhance market efficiency and consumer protection, fostering a fairer pharmaceutical landscape.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and Pharmaceutical Companies: The bill places these intermediaries under increased scrutiny, potentially leading to regulatory changes that could alter their business practices and profitability. The examination of their pricing practices and market influence could result in the need for heightened transparency and potentially restrictive regulations.

Consumers and Patients: Should the bill achieve its goal of improving transparency and reducing drug prices, consumers stand to benefit significantly. Lower drug costs and increased access to affordable medications could enhance public health and alleviate financial burdens on patients requiring long-term treatments.

Lawmakers and Regulators: For legislators and agencies like the FTC, the bill provides a framework to strengthen oversight and enforcement in the pharmaceutical sector. The results of this investigation could guide future legislative actions targeting market inefficiencies and anticompetitive practices.

In summary, while the "Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025" aims to confront pressing issues in the pharmaceutical supply chain, the bill's effectiveness will largely depend on precise execution, comprehensive analysis, and timely enforcement. By addressing the identified issues, the bill could play a pivotal role in reshaping the pharmaceutical market for the betterment of public interests and fair competition.

Issues

  • The bill's definition of 'higher cost' and 'lower cost' prescription drugs in Section 3 is ambiguous. This lack of clarity could lead to varied interpretations, potentially affecting formulary designs and consumer costs, which is significant for legal and financial reasons.

  • Section 3's requirement for an interim report 'not later than 180 days' and a final report 'not later than 1 year' after enactment does not include consequences for delays. This could delay addressing key issues in the pharmaceutical supply chain, affecting regulatory compliance and public interest.

  • The bill lacks detailed metrics or standards for measuring competition, transparency, and consumer benefit in Section 3. This omission could hinder the assessment of effectiveness and compliance, impacting public trust and financial outcomes.

  • In Section 3, the bill requires observations from a specific past roundtable (November 2017) without considering current market conditions. This could bias analysis and outcomes, undermining the relevance and applicability of the findings in the current context.

  • Section 4 does not specify a timeline for the submission of the report on anticompetitive behavior, which might delay necessary actions and affect the legal process and consumer protection.

  • Section 4 lacks clear definitions for 'anticompetitive conduct' and 'sole-source drug,' leading to potential legal discrepancies and challenges in enforcement.

  • The bill's language regarding 'policy or legislative recommendations' in Section 4 is vague, as it does not clarify if these are merely suggestions or obligations, affecting the legal and procedural outcomes.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill gives it a short title, stating that it can be called the "Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025."

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines two definitions for terms used in the Act. It defines "appropriate committees of Congress" as the Judiciary Committees of both the Senate and the House of Representatives, and "Commission" as referring to the Federal Trade Commission.

3. Study of pharmaceutical supply chain intermediaries and merger activity Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Commission to submit a report to Congress within one year, examining whether pharmacy benefit managers engage in practices that affect competition and prescription drug prices, and includes recommendations for improving transparency and competition in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Additionally, an interim report with preliminary findings must be submitted within 180 days.

4. Report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Commission must report to Congress on three points: the number and types of complaints about unfair practices by drug manufacturers with sole-source drugs, how well the Commission can take legal action against these manufacturers, and suggestions for improving laws against such unfair behavior.