Overview
Title
To take certain land into trust for the benefit of the Tonto Apache Tribe, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
In a fun story, imagine a government like a big superhero who gives a special land to their friends, the Tonto Apache Tribe, so they can take care of it without worrying about anyone digging for shiny rocks or interfering.
Summary AI
S. 5265 is a bill introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at transferring certain national forest lands to be held in trust for the benefit of the Tonto Apache Tribe. The Secretary of Agriculture is instructed to transfer administrative control of the specified lands in Arizona to the Secretary of the Interior, who will manage the land as part of the Tonto Apache Tribe's reservation. The lands, once transferred, will be protected from public land laws, mining, and mineral leasing.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Tonto Apache Land Transfer Act," aims to facilitate the transfer of specific lands in Gila County, Arizona, to be held in trust for the Tonto Apache Tribe. Introduced in the Senate, this act directs the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain National Forest System lands to the Secretary of the Interior. This land, once transferred, will be formally integrated into the Tonto Apache Reservation and will be administered under the regulations and laws applicable to lands held in trust for Indian tribes. Moreover, the bill outlines that these lands will be withdrawn from forms of land entry, mining, and leasing, while ensuring that existing rights, such as easements and contracts, are honored.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several critical issues arise from the bill's provisions. Firstly, the bill utilizes vague terms such as "as soon as practicable" with respect to the timing of the land transfer, which could lead to delays or lackluster enforcement, thus hindering the Tonto Apache Tribe's ability to utilize the land effectively. Secondly, the bill does not provide detailed procedures for the surveying or verification of the land boundaries, possibly leading to disputes or errors. Additionally, while aiming to protect the transferred land from mining and other appropriations, the bill might not sufficiently address existing rights and the interests of stakeholders, increasing the risk of legal challenges. Finally, the depth of the land transfer to one tribe raises questions about fairness and adherence to broader land transfer policies.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill represents a positive step towards fulfilling commitments to native tribes by granting them autonomy over lands that have cultural, economic, and environmental significance. For the public, the legislation may further policies that reinforce the honoring of agreements and respectful acknowledgment of historical territories for native tribes. However, a potential impact on the surrounding communities might include changes in public land use, restricted access for non-tribal members, and alteration in available natural resources management.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The most apparent beneficiaries of the bill are the Tonto Apache Tribe, who stand to gain significant control over culturally and economically valuable lands, potentially enhancing their self-governance and economic development. Conversely, existing stakeholders, including businesses and non-tribal entities with interests in the transferred lands, may face disruptions or legal complexities, particularly if their current rights or agreements are not explicitly protected or recognized. Federal and state bodies involved in land management may also experience administrative challenges due to ambiguities in the bill's provisions regarding timing and procedural clarity.
In conclusion, while the bill is a step towards reinforcing tribal sovereignty and rights, it necessitates careful consideration of its implementation specifics to ensure fair treatment of all parties involved and to prevent potential disputes. This approach will ultimately ensure the successful and equitable management of the lands in question.
Issues
The ambiguity of the term 'as soon as practicable' in Section 2(a) could lead to delays in the land transfer process, impacting the Tonto Apache Tribe's ability to manage the land effectively.
Section 2(b) does not specify the process for surveying or verifying the boundaries of the land to be transferred, which could result in disputes or errors during the land transfer.
The withdrawal of land from entry and appropriation as stated in Section 2(d) might not adequately address the rights of existing stakeholders or interested parties, potentially leading to legal challenges.
The bill appears to implicitly favor the Tonto Apache Tribe by transferring a significant amount of land without apparent measures to ensure fairness or compliance with broader land transfer policies, which may require further review.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the Act is the "Tonto Apache Land Transfer Act".
2. Tonto Apache Tribe land transfer Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section instructs the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer control of certain lands in Gila County, Arizona, to the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Tonto Apache Tribe. The land will become part of the Tonto Apache Reservation and will be exempt from most forms of land entry, mining, and leasing, subject to existing rights.