Overview
Title
To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require any cost estimate for a bill or joint resolution prepared by the Congressional Budget Office to include the cost to each United States citizen for carrying out such measure, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 5159 is a bill that wants to make sure everyone knows how much money a new law will cost each person by asking a special office to do the math and tell everybody. It helps people understand how changes in laws might affect the money the country spends and owes.
Summary AI
S. 5159 proposes an amendment to the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. This bill requires the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to include the cost to each United States citizen when estimating the financial impact of a bill or joint resolution. Specifically, it mandates that estimates should cover the change in total federal spending and federal debt if the proposed legislation is implemented. The bill aims to provide citizens with a clearer understanding of how new laws may impact them financially.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, introduced as Senate Bill 5159, seeks to amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The main goal of this amendment is to ensure that any cost estimate for a bill or joint resolution prepared by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) includes an estimate of how much the bill will cost each individual United States citizen. It aims to make federal spending and debt implications more transparent by providing a per-person breakdown of these costs whenever a new legislative measure is considered.
Summary of Significant Issues
A number of issues arise with this amendment. First, calculating the cost per citizen could be challenging due to the broad and sometimes complex nature of federal spending and debt management. Clarifying the 'period covered by the estimate' and defining who is responsible for these calculations are essential, but absent from the current amendment.
Furthermore, the intended purpose behind breaking down costs to a citizen level is not explicitly stated. This vagueness could lead to potential misunderstandings, impacting public trust. The use of the word "shall" in the amendment may also lead to interpretation disputes, necessitating clarity to ensure consistent application.
Impact on the Public
The requirement to include cost estimates per citizen has the potential to enhance transparency in government spending, helping individuals understand the financial impact of legislative measures on their personal finances. However, the effectiveness of this transparency relies heavily on accurate and understandable communication of these estimates.
The complexity of calculating such individual costs may affect how this information is perceived; hence, additional educational efforts may be necessary to ensure the public properly understands these numbers and the methodology behind them.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
This amendment may increase the workload of the CBO, requiring additional resources or processes to generate the new per-citizen estimates. The potential complexities involved could necessitate hiring more staff or investing in new technologies to ensure accuracy and efficiency.
Legislators and Policy Makers
For legislators, having a per-citizen cost estimate can serve as a valuable tool when advocating for or against certain bills. It provides a tangible figure that can enhance discussions around fiscal responsibility. However, it may also present challenges if these figures are used without proper context or are inaccurately portrayed in political debates.
General Public
For the general public, this information could boost engagement and interest in legislative processes by directly linking congressional decisions with individual financial impacts. However, misunderstandings of these estimates could also lead to misinformation if the estimates are taken out of context or inaccurately reported by media outlets.
In summary, while the intention behind Senate Bill 5159 is to foster transparency and accountability in government spending, its success will largely depend on how the estimates are calculated and communicated, and whether they are used constructively in policy discussions.
Issues
The amendment requires estimating the cost per citizen regarding the total change in federal spending and debt, which might be difficult to accurately calculate and communicate to the public, especially considering differences in interpretation of what constitutes the 'period covered by the estimate' (Section 1).
The amendment does not specify who is responsible for calculating or verifying the accuracy of these citizen-level estimates, introducing potential for inconsistencies and inaccuracies (Section 1).
The purpose of including these estimates is unclear, which could lead to ambiguity or misuse in applying this amendment, affecting public understanding and trust (Section 1).
The use of the word 'shall' may lead to interpretation disputes without further context or guidelines, impacting the legal clarity and enforcement of the new requirements (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Including costs to citizens of spending in CBO estimates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text details an amendment to the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. It requires that budget estimates include a calculation of how changes in total federal spending and debt would break down per citizen if certain bills or resolutions are enacted.